Vader wins. he is completely underrated because the OT movies were made when trchnology sucked, and GL had little ambition for the characters and didn't put too much effort into the choreography.
If you would make threads that actually have two characters that can contest well then people would like it, also make it interesting. Vader easily takes this, quite simply read any of the comics/novels in between ROTS and ANH, it shows Vader's abilities and powers.
Done before. Anyway, depends on which GG. He would be owned against Vader if he was the ROTS version. But if he the ROTS novelization/Clone Wars version, he would put up one hell of a fight before going down to Vader.
__________________
"Today was good. Today was fun. Tomorrow is another one." -Dr. Seuss
Personally, I don't see Vader winning in a lightsabre duel, perhaps with the force, but's he ****ed if it's only a lightsabre fight. Vader simply doesn't have the mobility or speed to deal with Grievous, especially considering it took Obi-Wan Kenobi, the Soresu Master to take him down. So no, in a lightsabre fight, Grievous will win the day.
If it's not? Then I don't see Grievous being able to recover from Vader's force attacks...
Grievous from the Clone Wars might be able to beat OT Vader becuase Vader might not be fast enough to block Grievous's lightsabers. So in Purge Vader killed what? How many Jedi? Cause Grievous beat five Jedi, three which were masters, two of the masters were on the council, at once.
Tsui Choi was in the party that Vader killed and he was more powerful then any of the people that Grievous faced. This was also Vader still getting used to his suit.
Yeah, and it's also total bullshit, there's no way Vader could do all that when in RODV he had trouble killing one Knight (Bol Chatak). Are we to assume that Bol Chatak, just some random Knight who managed to survive Order 66, could beat these five Jedi at once or even compete with them? And Tsui Choi was kileld by Stormtroopers, not Vader. And whether he's stronger than Mundi or Shaak Ti would be debatable. What has he ever done to be more powerful than they are?
I believe it would be close. Grievous might be able to take Vader out before Vader can utilize his force powers. Vader CAN'T COMPETE AT ALL in a lightsaber duel, he would be slaughtered FAST.
__________________ "At an end your rule is, and not short enough it was "-Yoda
For once, I agree. You have Vader depicted very well in RoDV, struggling with his new identity and handicap, and in Purge - taking place at the same time, give or take a couple of weeks - he's wrecking Jedi Masters. With a few months or years, yeah, but Purge was queer. . .
Purge DID take place AFTER RODV, so it's not that bad. He was just getting used to the suit in RODV. By Purge, I guess he was warmed up. I mean, he was confident enough to take on a whole bunch of Jedi Masters alone.
I love how people say that the ancient sith must be quick to produce the power that they do, yet the same people claim that Vader (who is the most powerful force user (power as in strength) is as slow as ****.
But Vader lost to Luke. No matter how emotionally upset he might have been, that's still pathetic. A half trained Jedi who hasn't even dueled another force user before. I can't see Grievous losing to Luke under ANY circumstances.
__________________ "At an end your rule is, and not short enough it was "-Yoda
Apr 6th, 2006 08:04 AM
