Actually he was comparing Brosnan to Moore not Dalton to Moore. But yeah thats a great point.All the true Bond fans like you said,agree that Connery and Moore are the two best to have played the role and like you said,the proof is in the pudding on that because all you got to do to see thats correct is go to any Bond message board forum anywhere and when the discussion comes down to who was the best Bond it always comes down to being between Moore and Connery with Connery usually winning out.I like Moore the best but Conney usually always beats him which is okay with me because Connery was good as well.
oh by the RZA.my comment wasnt directed at you,it was at Darth just so you know.I mean that is such an ignorant comment that Moore is a horrible actor.He would never have lasted so long as Bond if that was true,he also made more Bond films than Brosnan.He also at least acted like Bond in his Bond movies where Brosnan acted the same EXACT same way in the Bond movies as he did on Remington Steele.Brosnan has been okay in other movies before,but he was a HORRIBLE Bond.what I also find funny about Darth's argument is that Moore at least got to go out on his own terms and leave as Bond when he decided to by retiring from acting where Brosnan was forced to leave and TOLD he was no longer wanted as Bond.
I actually thought that Goldeneye was a good movie. I always liked those Cold War politics and the way some of the Bond movies were centered around them. And I disagree; I liked Brosnan's bond, even though he wasn't tough enough (he got held in a regular, normal, plain old Chinese prison camp for months and not only couldn't escape but didn't even try to).
while I still wished they had simply just stopped making any more james bond movies after roger moore retired because I dont like craig as Bond because he doesnt look the part,he at least was a much better Bond than Brosan because unlike Brosnan,he can at least act.had to make this comment since I finally saw the latest james bond film.
one thing that cant be changed and is the proof in the pudding for the people living in denial that Brosnan was a good Bond is that Connery and Moore got to go out on THEIR terms and quit playing Bond when THEY wanted to quit.Brosnan was given his walking papers and told not to come back and he was pissed about it. Connery and Moore got to do 7 Bond films where Brosnan only got to do 4.Also the OFFICIAL reason that Brosnan was told they didnt want him back was because they wanted a younger Bond.Where the truth is obvious they just didnt want to hurt his feelings that they realised he was a bad actor for the role and just made up that excuse.I mean Brosnan too old to play Bond? yeah right,he's only like 49 and Roger Moore was in his late 50's before he retired.Naw Brosnan was forced out because they finally saw how bad his acting was.
Last edited by Mr Parker on Dec 9th, 2006 at 09:30 PM
He's not as rich as they are by any means but he's finanicially stable though so.Like I said,that reason given to him that he was too old doesnt fly because Moore was a lot older than Brosnan and look how long they allowed him to play Bond.
Yeah true.Stallone is a perfect example.Instead of just quitting with Rocky 3 and leaving it as a trilogy like he SHOULD have.He stopped caring about writing good quality scripts for the rocky films and the last two sucked so we suffered through the crappy rocky 4 and rocky 5 and whats worse is he's got rocky 6 coming out soon.
Last edited by Mr Parker on Dec 9th, 2006 at 09:42 PM