 |
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
Our other motivation for seizing control of Afghanistan was this: inside Russia there exists an immense oil field in the remote Capsian landscape that could produce enough fuel to fulfill the United States needs for over 27 years (If it all went to our Country). There's only one problem though, because to get this supply to our existing oil lines, we had to do away with a tiny roadblock -- it's a country called Afghanistan.
The biggest problem with this scenario is that we're still relying on a form of "old-thought". Fossil fuels are choking our Planet. If General Motors and Mobil have things their way, we'll soon have a billion cars in China. Sure, it's great for the profit margin, but it's extremely terrible for the Planet! It's literally choking us to death.
The other natural resources that Afghanistan has in addition to natural gas and petroleum are coal, copper, and zinc. The Controllers know that if they can tap into those resources, they'll be less reliant upon foreign countries such as Saudi Arabia, which now produces half of the World's oil supply. And when you think about it, from the time of the Crusades up until the 1920's, the Middle East was nothing more than a sandbox to the Controllers. They didn't care at all about it. But now, this area wields an amazing array of power. The horrifying aspect of their influence is that, by and large, many of these people are so diametrically opposed to our way of life, that they truly despise us! And yet, the Controllers and the American Government keep catering to them so that the oil doesn't stop flowing!
Whenever you hear media talk about the Controllers setting up a "puppet government" in Afghanistan, just remember what's really going on. We're only there for two reasons -- opium and oil. To reinforce this point, why, on October 21, 2001, did the military say that they were actually running out of targets to bomb in Afghanistan? If that's the case, why didn't they go in and torch all the opium fields so that they'll guarantee that no more heroin comes out of there for the next couple of years? It's something to think about.
On September 27, 2001 in the Pakistani newspaper, Unmat, Osama bin Laden said:
"Drug smugglers from all over the World are in contact with the U.S. Secret Agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the United States drug enforcement department are encouraging drug trade so they can show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Manuel Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, eventually, he was made a scapegoat....Is it not that there exists a government within a government in the United States? That secret governments must be asked who made the attacks"?
I love America myself, and I think bin Laden is a rat, but he hit pretty darn close to the mark with his comment. And now that bin Laden is on the run, we should turn our attention back towards the Controllers.
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:03 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
The Carlyle Group has an inordinate amount of access to the current administration which is used for their own personal gain, and some people may not have realized the general importance of this situation.
In the early 1990's, the Carlyle Group put George W. Bush on the board of one of their subsidiaries -- CaterAir. To keep him occupied until he could be "selected" to his future job as Governor of Texas, the Carlyle Group lent a helping hand.
But lo and behold, one hand quickly washed the other, for after George W. Bush became Governor, he appointed several people to a Board that controlled the money invested by a Texas Teacher's Pension Fund -- a total of $100 million! So, this board decides to invest this PUBLIC MONEY with a certain group. Guess who it was. Yup, the Carlyle Group! In addition, another entity - the University of Texas Board of Regents -- invested millions of dollars, too. And guess which way it went. To the Carlyle Group. So lets see -- Texas, Bush, money, and the Carlyle Group. A mere coincidence? Yeah right. Follow the money.
A case in point is Wayne Berman, a Washington consultant and George W. Bush fundraiser who got kickbacks of $900,000+ after Connecticut State Treasurer Paul Silvester pushed tens of millions of dollars of state pension funds to the investment portfolio of a certain group. And which group would that be? Yup, the Carlyle Group!
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:04 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
Are things starting to smell a little fishy? Maybe it doesn't matter that oil companies gave thirteen times more money to the Bush campaign in 2000 than they did to Gore, and that electric companies gave seven-times more. Not that I would have ever voted for either one of them, because they were both controlled by the Controllers, but come on now, thats a little one sided. There are tons of dirty dealings and shenanigans going on behind the scenes that aren't getting reported in the mainstream media.
In December, 2001, Frank Carlucci and James Baker (both Carlyle representatives) met at the Ritz-Carlton in Washington, D.C. for their annual investor conference. Also in attendance were the representatives of another important family that had invested huge amounts of money in the Carlyle Group. And what family were these individuals from? Hold your breath, but it was the BIN LADEN family. Worse, another famous politician was rumored to be at this same meeting after he SPENT THE NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE with George W. Bush. And who was it that supposedly met with the bin Laden family after spending the night at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue? Answer: George Bush Sr.!
Things are getting even stickier, huh? Well, Larry Klayman, spokesman for Judicial Watch, comments on this subject. "The idea of the President's father, an ex-President himself, doing business with a company under investigation by the FBI in the terror attacks of September 11 is horrible. President Bush should not ask, but demand that his father pull out of the Carlyle Group."
Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch, echoes this sentiment. "For the father of our current President to be doing business with foreign governments, there is a clear conflict of interest."
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:05 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
Now some of you might be wondering, "Hey, did I read that correctly? That the Bush family was doing business with the bin Laden family?" Regrettably, yes, you did.
Here's the story. Back in the early 1970s when George Bush started his first company, Arbusto Energy, Inc, his first business partner was Salem bin Laden. Yes, Osama bin Laden's brother! This fact is confirmed by the United Kingdom's "Daily Mail" which wrote that Salem bin Laden, "Invested heavily in Bush's first business venture." Salem is also a close friend of Saudi Arabia's King Fahd.
Now some may say, hey, that was a long time ago. Let bygones be bygones. But how does that account, then, for George Bush Sr.'s meeting TWICE with the bin Laden family prior to the 9-11 attacks, the second time being in January, 2000? Or how the bin Laden's have been frequented by Bush, James Baker, and Frank Carlucci over the past few years in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia?
Charles Freeman, President of the Middle East Policy Council, has said of the clandestine relationship, "If there were ever any company closely connected to the U.S. and it's presence in Saudi Arabia, it's the bin Laden Group. They're the establishment Osama's trying to overthrow."
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:06 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
This information changes the entire complexion of the "War on Terrorism" doesn't it? I mean, the bin Laden family invested $2 million into the Carlyle Group, but that's only what's been "seen". A foreign investor with ties to the bin Laden's told the European Wall Street Journal on September 28, 2001 that, "The family's overall interest with Carlyle is considerably larger." And according to the Wall Street Journal on September 27, 2001, guess who brokered these deals between the bin Laden's and Carlyle? Good 'ol George Bush, Sr!!
So, due to the touchy nature of this relationship, the bin Laden's pulled their investment money out of Carlyle in October 2001. But let's stop for a moment and examine this situation. George Bush had invested money into the Carlyle Group, and was also employed by them. Likewise, the bin Laden's were substantial investors in the Carlyle Group, and have had business ties with George Bush for 30 years since the early 1970's. Now you have to ask yourself, how does the Carlyle Group derive a large percentage of their revenue? Answer: From foreign military contracts and America's War Machine!
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:07 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
Zeroing in on this sinister configuration of forces, the Wall Street Journal, on September 27, 2001 in their "Special Report": Aftermath of Terror" section stated: "If the United States boosts defense spending in the quest to stop Osama bin Laden's alleged terrorist activities, there may be one unexpected beneficiary: Mr. bin Laden's family."
Is it starting to sink in yet? George Bush, Sr. is tied to the Carlyle Group and America's War Machine like the spots on a leopard. And guess what his son - the current President of the United States -- wants to do very soon -- wage another war in the Middle East. And the bin Laden family, former investors in the Carlyle Group, also have a direct family member acting as key player in this scenario -- their brother, Osama bin Laden.
Sons, brothers, business ties, investments, the Carlyle Group, huge amounts of profits to be made, oil pipelines running across Afghanistan, and America's War Machine. Do these connections and inter-related "coincidences" stink to high Heaven? You better believe they do.
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:08 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
Just to let you guys know, Mr. Bush himself announced on TV awhile back that he is planning to introduce a National ID Card for the Illegal immigrants in this country.
On the surface, this may appear to be a good idea. But have you guys been reading anything I have been posting?
This IS THE FIRST STEP TO TAKING AWAY OUR FREEDOMS. THIS IS THE FIRST STEP BEFORE THEY INTRODUCE THE CHIPS INTO THE PLAMS OF PEOPLES HANDS SO THAT THEY CAN BE MONITORED AT ALL TIMES.
And you are probably saying, what are you talking about? The cards will be for illegal aliens and not for U.S. citizens. Are you crazy? At first the cards will be for illegals yes, but they are purposely designed to fail! Yes, you heard that right, they are designed to not work out! And the next step will be the implants into the illegals palms so that they can all be tracked "without problems".
And so again, perhaps you are saying, yes but the chips will be for the illegals and not for us. Yes at first the chips will be for the illegals, but it's all part of the Controllers plans people! Wake up! Eventually, they will introduce the chips to everybody! The illegal situation is just a tool for that to happen! They are using the illegals as a means to Start their programs!
And when you think about it, they were pritty clever with this idea. What illegal in the United States right now is going to complain about receiving ID cards as long as they and their families can remain here and work here for as long as they want? Do you think any illegal will complain about that? Of course not! And the Controllers know it!
And again, there is only massive group of people here in the United States who would not feel bad about getting their hands chipped after the ID cards turn out to be a bad idea. And who do you think they are? The Illegals! Of course! These people lose limbs and arms and what not just to get here and risk their lives in the desert! Who thinks they will actually complain about getting a fricken chip into the palm of their hands if it means they can be here forever!? They won't give a damn! And at first the American people won't either, until the Controllers announce that it is time for ALL AMERICANS TO GET CHIPPED! FOR "SAFETY REASONS".
People, we need to wake up now. If we allow for the Controllers and their puppet Bush to introduce these ID cards into the United States, then they will have been successful in introducing their first steps for New World Order in this country! And the loss of our rights and the equivalent of slavery will be the end result!
If we don't stop them for doing this, we're screwed.
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:08 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
Another thing you guys should know, is that after World War 1, the Treaty of Versailles was formulated to force Germany into making reparations for their destruction. The Treaty of Versailles was implemented by a host of international bankers for their OWN benefit, and was ultimately approved and sponsored by the United States government. Out of this treat, J. P. Morgan orchestrated the Dawes Plan, which was a series of loans made from American banks that ultimately resulted in the formation of I. G. Farben. This super-powerful company came about because Germany diverted some of the money that was intended to pay off their loans into the merger of two chemical and steel companies, thus creating the notorious I. G. Farben Company.
After the Dawes Plan failed, the Young Plan (1928) was implemented. But all this program did was create hyperinflation, send unemployment through the roof, and fill the German people with such abject disgust that it paved the way for Hitler's rise to power. Thus, these treaties and plans were supposed to return peace to the World and instead they accomplished the opposite. The international bankers turned into manipulative statesmen and reaped huge profits through interest payments, while Germany's war machine and I. G. Farben were created in the process.
As money was diverted from loan payments into Germany's re-armament, I. G. Farben, an immense chemical empire, stood at center stage and acted hand-in-hand with the Nazi's. Created in 1925 (three years before the Young Plan was enacted), I. G. Farben became THE powerhouse industrial force in Germany. Now here's where it gets interesting. A man named Max Warburg was on the Board of Supervisors at I. G. Farben; and his brother Paul, founder of the Federal Reserve, was also a member of Farben's American subsidary.
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:09 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
So, do you see what's going on? American bankers in the guise of statesmen created treaties and plans to loan money to the Germans, who siphoned off the money and formed I. G. Farben. Then - and here's the kicker - Farben set up a slush fund and funneled money to finance Hitler's rise to power. It's all starting to make sense now, huh?
After establishing himself as the Fuhrer, Hitler told I. G. Farben that Germany needed to be self-sufficient in regard to rubber production, gasoline, oils, minerals, and explosives. Within a short time, Farben owned coal mines, electric power plants, iron & steel factories, banks, research units, and chemical refineries.
Farben's monopolistic control of Germany was so vast that the company produced the following statistics:
I. G. Farben Production (For the year 1942)
Synthetic Rubber - 100% of Germany's supply
Plastics - 90% of Germany's supply
Explosives - 84% of Germany's supply
Jet Fuel - 46% of Germany's supply
Oil - 100% of Germany's supply
Gunpowder - 70% of Germany's supply
Gasoline - 33% of Germany's supply
Zyklon B - 95% of Germany's supply
Yes, you saw that last item correctly. Zyklon B. It was the poison used to gas the Jews in the concentration camps during World War 2! Did you ever wonder where it came from? Now you know. I. G. Farben, the company that extorted reparation money and financed Hitler, was the one who produced it!!
And to give you a little view of the American arm of I. G. Farben at that time, here is a list of which American companies had representatives on I. G. Farben's Board of Directors:
1. Federal Reserve Bank of New York
2. Bank of Manhattan
3. Standard Oil of New Jersey
4. Ford Motor Company
Pritty sick and twisted!
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:11 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
Do you know who owned Standard Oil of New Jersey? The Rockefeller family! And, would you like to know a little tidbit of information? In 1939, when World War 2 was kicking in full-bore, Standard Oil of New Jersey sold 20 million dollars worth of aviation gasoline to a German company. Who do you think this company was? I. G. Farben! When news reports chronicled Germany's blitzkrieg across Europe and their fighter pilots were decimating cities, a Rockefeller-owned American company was selling them fuel! It makes you wonder, huh?
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:12 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
By the way guys, it looks like things are alot worse than I already thought. It turns out that not only are the Illegals going to be issued a "temporary legal status" ID card, but that ALL AMERICANS are going to receive a National ID card in the year 2008. And that This card goes into effect in 2008.This will be coupled with the standardized national drivers' license in the same year. State govts. are complaining about the cost of the nationalized and standardized drivers license because of the technology involved.
So it's alot worse than I was thinking then. I actually thought for a second like we might have a chance to curb the ID before they made it official. Well, too late for that I guess.
But I have been trying to figure out what the Controllers and the Government have been up to with this whole Illegal Immigration thing. Yesterday I truly thought I had it nailed, that is until I found out that the card is already official! I couldn't believe that when I read it. Now it's just a matter of time before we get "chipped" then? Shit......what's next?
I truly do believe that they are going to use these people as pawns for their game. The illegals will do anything for the right to be here...and the U.S. Government knows it. Their ID is the one I would worry about most. Because people coming here illegally from all over the World will find ways to conterfeit it. This will cause the American people to get extremely angry with the ID card for temporary legal status. And they will ask the Government to do something about it because the problem of illegals pouring in won't get any better. And so...my theory is that this is when the Government will try and push ahead with their Microchip program. Which will pritty much be purposely designed to be flawless in the Government's eyes, and they will try to make a case for them to the people. And the U.S. Government, in my opinion, is going to solve the whole conterfeiting problem by "chipping" the ones who they permit to come in and out of the United States for temporary status. And don't think they can't do it. If they can issue an ID for people who live in other countries, and who don't officially live here, and one that will be recognized whenever they enter this country, then they can sure as hell go ahead and issue them microchip implants as well. Vicente Fox or any other foreign President is not going to be complaining considering that the foreign Governments of these other countries are part of the reason that these people are flocking here by the masses.
But anyways, this is what I think is going to go down. I don't think our National ID cards in 2008 are going to be the mechanism for the Government introducing it's MicroChip program, because it just doesn't make sense. Why would Americans counterfeit their own national ID's? Why would we need to? We would still have our birth cirtificates ect. to show that we were born here. But the illegals from other countries on the other hand? They are going to have a field day with their newly issued temporary status ID's. They are going to be conterfeiting them and passing them around like they were Gold! And this is how I truly believe the Government is going to make it's case for the Microchipping program that it soon plans to implement. Problem (Illegal Immigrants conterfeiting their ID's) - Reaction (The American people demanding for something to be done) - Solution (The American Government announcing it's Microchip program).
Problem
Reaction
Solution
It's how they get us every time.
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:12 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
Tell you what,
For those who don't know who the Rockefellers are, or anything about their family, now would be a perfect time for you to learn.
Walter Cronkite - CBS Reported:
"The Rockefellers are the epitome of the nation's permanent Establishments: governments change, economies fluctuate, foreign alliances shift -- the Rockefellers prevail.
On September 29, 1916, the New York Times called John. D. Rockefeller America's first billionaire.
The Rockefellers protect their money via Trusts and Foundations. Ever since 1913 when the Federal Income Tax was implemented, Congress allowed the wealthy elite to protect their money so that it wouldn't be subjected to the same enslaving taxation that hinders the rest of us. By placing their money in Trusts and Foundations, these wealthy individuals give up "ownership" of their properties, but they ultimately retain control of it via positions on each foundation's Board of Directors. Thus, they don't have pink slips or titles because their assets are in trusts, yet they ultimately keep control while not having to pay income, probate, estate, or inheritance taxes. Pretty sneaky, huh?
The Rockefellers have controlled at least 200 trusts/funds at once, but the number could well be in the thousands if one uncovered all the complex layers of their financial empire. Because of all these complexities, they virtually pay no taxes. In fact, in 1970 Nelson Rockefeller testified before a Judiciary Committee and stated that although his income tax was 33 million dollars the year before, he paid NO INCOME TAXES.
He then admitted that his actual income was 198 million -- not 33 million. But the particulars were the same -- no income taxes paid by one of the richest men in America.
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:13 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
The Rockefeller Estate in Pocantico Hills consists of over 7,500 acres and has 70 miles of private roads, 75 buildings, and underground entranceways so the "help" can enter without being seen by the followers. Gee, I wonder who else enters this way.....
The Rockefeller Estate employs 500 persons full-time to maintain the grounds.
The Rockefellers own a significant portion of America's top 50 companies: IBM, Chase Manhattan, Mobil, Kodiak, GE, Texas Instruments, and Exxon.
Their money is used to control the government, big business, energy, banking, the media, religion, and education.
John. D. Rockefeller once said, "competition is a sin." He deduced that the only efficient way to run anything was via a monopoly.
When John. D. started his oil business in 1859 as a small fry, he used bribery, coercion, violence, spies in his competitor's workplace, and a variety of financial schemes to one-up the next guy. Within 30 years, by 1890, 90% of all American crude oil was refined by John D Rockefeller's Standard Oil Company.
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:14 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
John D. Rockefeller eventually controlled two of the most valuable commodities on Earth, money and fuel -- thus giving him the ability to create financial or energy crisis whenever it best suited his (or the Controllers) interests.
Here are some of the companies that are under the Rockefeller umbrella:
1. Chase Manhattan - not the largest bank in the World, but one of the most influential.
2. The largest controlling block of stock in at least 21 major corporations, including United Air Lines, Northwest, Long Island Lighting, and Atlantic Richfield.
3. Majority control in IBM, Mobil, Texaco, IT&T, Westinghouse, Boeing, International Paper, Sperry Rand, Xerox, and National Steel.
4. Transportation companies under the Rockefeller corporate thumb: Penn Central, TWA, Eastern Airlines, United, Delta and Northwest.
5. Other corporations where they have financial interest: AT&T, Motorola, Honeywell, General Foods, and Burlington Industries.
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:15 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
When someone owns a powerful financial institution, they can make loans to specific companies and governments, then call the shots for these entities and make them jump through hoops. If they don't toe the line, they don't get the money. This is the gist of high-finance in a nutshell, and one of the primary reasons why we still don't have gasoline-free cars in America. No one's lending money (or enough of it) to the companies that are trying to find alternative-source automobiles.
The Rockefeller web envelopes 37 of the top 100 industries, 9 of the top 20 transportation firms, 1 utility company, and 3 of the 4 largest insurance companies.
The Washington Post once described the Rockefellers in these terms: "The power of the family fortune is beyond measure."
Quote from the Author: "Philanthropy is the essential element in the making of Rockefeller power. Philanthropy generates more power then wealth alone can provide."
In the early 1900's, John D. Rockefeller was one of the most hated men in America, his reputation horrible. So, what did he do? He hired a public relations firm to re-make his image.
How so? Well, whenever John D. Rockefeller would walk around in public, he carried dimes and threw them to all the little street urchins (of course, only when camera's were there to catch the moment).
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:16 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
FAQ: How Real ID will affect you
What's all the fuss with the Real ID Act about?
President Bush is expected to sign an $82 billion military spending bill soon that will, in part, create electronically readable, federally approved ID cards for Americans. The House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved the package--which includes the Real ID Act--on Thursday.
What does that mean for me?
Starting three years from now, if you live or work in the United States, you'll need a federally approved ID card to travel on an airplane, open a bank account, collect Social Security payments, or take advantage of nearly any government service. Practically speaking, your driver's license likely will have to be reissued to meet federal standards.
The Real ID Act hands the Department of Homeland Security the power to set these standards and determine whether state drivers' licenses and other ID cards pass muster. Only ID cards approved by Homeland Security can be accepted "for any official purpose" by the feds.
How will I get one of these new ID cards?
You'll still get one through your state motor vehicle agency, and it will likely take the place of your drivers' license. But the identification process will be more rigorous.
For instance, you'll need to bring a "photo identity document," document your birth date and address, and show that your Social Security number is what you had claimed it to be. U.S. citizens will have to prove that status, and foreigners will have to show a valid visa.
State DMVs will have to verify that these identity documents are legitimate, digitize them and store them permanently. In addition, Social Security numbers must be verified with the Social Security Administration.
What's going to be stored on this ID card?
At a minimum: name, birth date, sex, ID number, a digital photograph, address, and a "common machine-readable technology" that Homeland Security will decide on. The card must also sport "physical security features designed to prevent tampering, counterfeiting, or duplication of the document for fraudulent purposes."
Homeland Security is permitted to add additional requirements--such as a fingerprint or retinal scan--on top of those. We won't know for a while what these additional requirements will be.
Why did these ID requirements get attached to an "emergency" military spending bill?
Because it's difficult for politicians to vote against money that will go to the troops in Iraq and tsunami relief. The funds cover ammunition, weapons, tracked combat vehicles, aircraft, troop housing, death benefits, and so on.
The House already approved a standalone version of the Real ID Act in February, but by a relatively close margin of 261-161. It was expected to run into some trouble in the Senate. Now that it's part of an Iraq spending bill, senators won't want to vote against it.
What's the justification for this legislation anyway?
Its supporters say that the Real ID Act is necessary to hinder terrorists, and to follow the ID card recommendations that the 9/11 Commission made last year.
It will "hamper the ability of terrorist and criminal aliens to move freely throughout our society by requiring that all states require proof of lawful presence in the U.S. for their drivers' licenses to be accepted as identification for federal purposes such as boarding a commercial airplane, entering a federal building, or a nuclear power plant," Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner, a Wisconsin Republican, said during the debate Thursday.
You said the ID card will be electronically readable. What does that mean?
The Real ID Act says federally accepted ID cards must be "machine readable," and lets Homeland Security determine the details. That could end up being a magnetic strip, enhanced bar code, or radio frequency identification (RFID) chips.
In the past, Homeland Security has indicated it likes the concept of RFID chips. The State Department is already going to be embedding RFID devices in passports, and Homeland Security wants to issue RFID-outfitted IDs to foreign visitors who enter the country at the Mexican and Canadian borders. The agency plans to start a yearlong test of the technology in July at checkpoints in Arizona, New York and Washington state.
Will state DMVs share this information?
Yes. In exchange for federal cash, states must agree to link up their databases. Specifically, the Real ID Act says it hopes to "provide electronic access by a state to information contained in the motor vehicle databases of all other states."
Is this legislation a done deal?
Pretty much. The House of Representatives approved the package on Thursday by a vote of 368-58. Only three of the "nay" votes were Republicans; the rest were Democrats. The Senate is scheduled to vote on it next week and is expected to approve it as well.
White House spokesman Scott McClellan has told reporters "the president supports" the standalone Real ID Act, and the Bush administration has come out with an official endorsement. As far back as July 2002, the Bush administration has been talking about assisting "the states in crafting solutions to curtail the future abuse of drivers' licenses by terrorist organizations."
Who were the three Republicans who voted against it?
Reps. Howard Coble of North Carolina, John Duncan of Tennessee, and Ron Paul of Texas.
Paul has warned that the Real ID Act "establishes a national ID card" and "gives authority to the Secretary of Homeland Security to unilaterally add requirements as he sees fit."
Is this a national ID card?
It depends on whom you ask. Barry Steinhardt, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's technology and liberty program, says: "It's going to result in everyone, from the 7-Eleven store to the bank and airlines, demanding to see the ID card. They're going to scan it in. They're going to have all the data on it from the front of the card...It's going to be not just a national ID card but a national database."
At the moment, state driver's licenses aren't easy for bars, banks, airlines and so on to swipe through card readers because they're not uniform; some may have barcodes but no magnetic stripes, for instance, and some may lack both. Steinhardt predicts the federalized IDs will be a gold mine for government agencies and marketers. Also, he notes that the Supreme Court ruled last year that police can demand to see ID from law-abiding U.S. citizens.
Will it be challenged in court?
Maybe. "We're exploring whether there are any litigation possibilities here," says the ACLU's Steinhardt.
One possible legal argument would challenge any requirement for a photograph on the ID card as a violation of religious freedom. A second would argue that the legislation imposes costs on states without properly reimbursing them.
When does it take effect?
The Real ID Act takes effect "three years after the date of the enactment" of the legislation. So if the Senate and Bush give it the thumbs-up this month, its effective date would be sometime in May 2008.
http://news.com.com/FAQ+How+Real+ID..._3-5697111.html
Here's a quick story on the bill from Puerto Rico which will have to comply with the legislation.
http://www.puertorico-herald.org/is...edGovEnac.shtml
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:18 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
Federal government enacts law requiring national IDs
States and U.S. territories, including Puerto Rico, will be required to issue federally approved national ID cards by 2008
By MARIELLA PEREZ SERRANO
National identification (ID) cards are on the way. Starting in 2008, if you live or work in the U.S., or any U.S. territory, including Puerto Rico, you will be required to carry a federally approved national ID card. That is, U.S. citizens will need the national ID to travel on an airplane, open a bank account, collect Social Security payments, or take advantage of nearly any government service.
In February, Congress approved a Republican-backed measure compelling states and U.S. territories to issue ID cards and passports with radio frequency identification (RFID) chips embedded in them by no later than 2008. The U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved an $82 billion military spending bill that will, in part, create federally approved ID cards for all U.S. citizens and permanent residents.
"All states and U.S. possessions, including Puerto Rico, will have to comply with the national ID card requirement. If you want to get into a federal building, on a train or airplane, or even receive your Social Security check, you will need this identification," explained Eduardo Bhatia, executive director of the Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration.
The authorizing language requires all states and U.S. possessions to enhance their driver’s license program. It will require the Commonwealth digitalize all drivers’ licenses with readable media and a digital photo. "Additionally, and this is the part of greatest contention among the states, all applicants’ immigration status must be verified," Bhatia said.
The authorizing legislation requires several changes to the existing system for the issuance of drivers’ licenses, including the digitalization of the actual license with readable media and a digital photo. The legislation also requires additional clearances for issuing agents and extra security requirements for issuing locations.
According to the bill, no funds are allocated to states or possessions to implement the necessary technology and equipment to issue the new identification cards. However, the authorizing language allows for a grant appropriation to states for the implementation of these provisions. The secretary of Homeland Security will determine these grants.
Those who don’t carry valid licenses will need to get the national ID card. Every U.S. citizen or U.S. resident will be required to have a uniform national ID.
Critics of this measure argue the Real ID Act gives the Department of Homeland Security unfettered authority to design and issue state ID cards and drivers’ licenses, may also hinder religious freedom, and will create a national database. Supporters of the measure, however, state the need for a national database, uniform security measures to diminish fraud, and a system for immigration checks.
National ID likely to replace state-issued driver’s license
Although still being discussed, Department of Homeland Security sources expressed the possibility for "biometric information such as retinal scans, fingerprints, DNA data, and RFID tracking technology." At a minimum, national ID cards will include a person’s full name, birth date, gender, ID number, digital photograph, address, machine-readable technology, person’s signature, and physical security features designed to prevent tampering, counterfeiting, or duplication of documents for fraudulent purposes.
"States and U.S. territories, including Puerto Rico, must require and verify the following before issuing a driver’s license or ID card: a photo identity document for all applicants [a nonphoto identity document is acceptable if it includes both the person’s full legal name and date of birth], documentation showing the applicant’s date of birth, proof and verification of the applicant’s social security account number, and documentation showing the applicant’s name and address of principal residence," explained Bhatia.
The bill also establishes the new driver’s license, or national ID card, will include a data chip with evidence of an applicant’s lawful status. For immigrants temporarily residing in the U.S., the ID must clearly indicate it is temporary and can be renewed only with documentation verifying the residency status has been extended by the secretary of Homeland Security.
States also will be required to subject employees working with or producing drivers’ licenses and ID cards to a security clearance, establish fraudulent-document-recognition training programs, and provide electronic access to information contained in the motor vehicle database of other states. The drivers’ licenses will be valid for eight years.
"People will get an ID through the state motor vehicle agency, and it most likely will take the place of a driver’s license; the identification process will be very rigorous," stated House Judiciary Chairman Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.). "This bill adheres to the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, and it is needed to hamper the ability of criminal aliens to move freely throughout our society," he pointed out.
National ID cards are nothing new. "Many European countries, such as Spain and France, as well as many Asian countries, require their citizens to carry such documents at all times, with legal punishments in place for those caught without them," said Sensenbrenner. Yet, countries with similar English common-law legal systems, such as Australia and New Zealand, have rejected such national IDs.
As far back as July 2002, the Bush administration has been talking about creating measures to curtail abuse in drivers’ licenses. Plans to embed RFID chips in all U.S. passports and foreign visitors’ documents are underway.
By Sept. 11, all states and Puerto Rico will have to file a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff. This MOU mandates all states and U.S. territories verify the immigration status of everyone soliciting a driver’s license.
On May 14, President George W. Bush signed the National ID bill into law. Although in less than three years Puerto Rico residents will be required to carry a national ID, there has been no word from the Acevedo Vilá administration regarding either the impact of this new federal law on the island or when the local government will begin implementing the technology required for the drivers’ licenses on the island.
http://www.puertorico-herald.org/is...edGovEnac.shtml
---------
Yeah, it's worse than I thought. RFID chips can be hacked. The possibility for identity theft and fraud remains. The national ID and related programs are to build a database on the populace and control it.
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:19 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
Here's the way foundations work: Once someone like the Rockefellers donate money to one of these entities (or creates a foundation themselves), they assume control of it and have this foundation spend money on their companies to bring them even more wealth!
It's great for them because it's all a big cycle of donating money (tax free), then waiting for this money to be incorporated back into their own companies to generate more profits. John D. Rockefeller called it, "The Principle of Scientific Giving"!
The Rockefellers also supported the passing of a bill on graduated income tax in 1913 because they found ways to avoid it! While the rest of us keep supporting THEIR governments by paying taxes, we're also kept DOWN because we can never rise to their level. Why? The answer's easy -- we're playing on an uneven field.
A graduated income tax also keeps competitors at bay because they have to continue paying taxes (they haven't risen to the elite level yet), while the Rockefellers hide their money in trusts and foundations. Thus, their assets are non-taxable, then passed from generation to generation, perpetuating the family's king-of-the-hill status.
The Rockefellers then use groups like the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) to carry out their government plans.
Fred Gates, who was in charge of the Rockefeller's General Education Board, said in Occasional Paper No. 1:
"In our dreams we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands."
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:20 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
In regard to higher education, the Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations provided two-thirds of all endowment funding to colleges from 1900-1933. Who do you think controls these institutions of higher learning? They have become a quasi Ministry of Education, exerting a high degree of control over their curriculum and what is taught.
Author Gary Allen states: "I believe those who control education will, over a period of several generations, control a nation."
Allen goes on to say that, considering all the money the Rockefeller's have given out over the past century, "we have been unable to find a single project in history of the Rockefeller Foundations which promotes free enterprise. Almost all the Rockefeller grants have been used directly or indirectly to promote economic and social collectivism, i. e. socialism-facism.
He continues: "The easiest way to control or eliminate competition is not to best them in the marketplace, but to use the power of the Government to exclude them from the marketplace."
And how does one do that? By controlling the Government!
John Franklin Campbell once wrote in New York Magazine, "Practicly every lawyer, banker, professor, general, journalist, and bureaucrat who has had any influence in the foreign policy of the last six presidents -- from Franklin Roosevelt to Richard Nixon -- has spent some time in the Harold Pratt House (home of the CFR)."
George Wallace (former Presidential candidate) said: "There isn't a dime's worth of difference between the Democratic and Republican parties."
Admiral Chester Ward, U. S. Navy; described the goal of the CFR as the submergence of U. S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one World Government.
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:21 AM |
|
|
| |
|
NuclearWinter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States Account Restricted |
James Warburg (February 17, 1950), CFR Member testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said:
"We shall have World Government whether you like it or not - by conquest or consent."
The Trilateral Commission, in the Triangle Papers released between October 1973 and December 1974, said their four major goals were:
1. Renovation of the World's monetary system. (Nearly the entire European continent just switched their currency to the EU in January, 2002).
2. Loot the United States of their resources for radicalization of the "have-not" nations.
3. Step-up trade with communist countries. (In the 1990's both NAFTA and GATT were passed by the United States Congress.)
4. Create energy crisis for greater international control. (Think back to the gasoline and fuel oil disasters a few years ago when gasoline prices rose to nearly $2.000 a gallon. Or how about what happened to gas prices after Katrina.
Dr. Medford Evans once said: "Energy makes the World go round. Who controls what makes the World go 'round controls the World."
Thomas Jefferson once said: "Since acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day, but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period, unalterable through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing us to slavery."
__________________
"To ignore factual reality by believing it to be otherwise does not mean that a person is removed from that reality. It only means that they suffer it ignorantly."
http://entertainmentcentral.iboards.us/
|
|
Aug 11th, 2006 02:24 AM |
|
|
| |
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 12:23 AM. |
|
|
Home » Misc » Conspiracy Forum » World War 3 - New World Order - Pole Shift - Age of Peace (2006-2012)
| |
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
Text-only version |
|
|
KMC Community Forums
