In general Murderers are worse because what they do always has permanent affects, while what child molestors do don't always ruin the lives of the person who was molested.
However, without generalizing, it really depends on the individual situation. As much as I don't care for Bardock, I agree with him on one thing: It depends on the person whose suffering it.
I would rather get shot in the head, then have some psycho rapist f*ck me with a knife.
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere in the trunk of my Oldsmo
Pedophiles... especially those who are involved in politics and even more especially those who portray themselves as advocates of "pro-family" and "anti-pedophilia" or "anti-homosexual" or whatnot.
Registered: May 2006
Location: One for the other hand
You said that this wasn’t an open-ended question now you are saying it is, make up your mind.
What the hell did you just say?
It is called sarcasm, and I have made enough points with you and you really need to lighten up.
In this context it is based on an opinion so it is subjective and there is no “defined parameters” on this topic. If you asked this same question to someone that was raped and someone that just lost a loved one to murder I’m sure you will get two completely different answers.
I didn't. The thread title is a closed question, in a strict linguistic sense.
Funny, I haven't been serious in one post as of yet, yet you continually bandy around terms like 'bitter', and 'lightening up'. I'm sensing...irrelevancy.
That's what I just said, isn't it?
You get no marks for retelling the story.
Urizen- that's true, which is why it's reasonable to explore actual evidence we can use, or to put it another way, to define 'worse'. Otherwise the thread is pointless (which I strongly suspect is the case, except for the fun factor).
You just wanted to announce that you like testicle-based stimulation though, didn't you?
Moreover, even if we compare the various factors or conceptions of each side, murder is always a murder. The other side can range from highly damaging to no damage at all.
Registered: May 2006
Location: One for the other hand
I use bitter because you seem to like belittling people and trying to prove you superiority over others and that to me is not lighting up and being bitter but that is just my opinion so take it as you want.
Registered: May 2006
Location: One for the other hand
No calling me stupid, ill logical and crap like that is belittling and I don’t see it as being “whooped” it was my opinion and I gave reasons for it and why I believed the way I did. You made a post that gave me a different view on the subject and I thank you for that but the point of any debate is to discusses and share ideas, I’m sorry if you don’t see it that way and like to make fun at people. I didn’t personally attack any of you so I don’t see why you couldn’t return the favor but I guess that is too much to ask here.
Have a nice day and I'm off work and time to go home and play in the snow.
As for my "insults", it's typically cowardly to overlook the fact that besides calling people idiots if I believe they're idiots, I actually make points and have coherent debates.
The fact that you choose not to focus on them is self-explanatory.
Based on a single post? If that's the case, don't you live in the Abortion thread, Mr I drink Jesus' sperm?
Nov 28th, 2006 11:15 PM
