Silent Coyote and Darkchoco failed to submit entries... Do they get extentions? Eclipso and Marko aren't within the limits... If you just go by the guides, we're already down to 8, but that's no fun...
We really have a problem now which messed up the whole going for the tourney thanks for the 2 that haven't posted and especially that 3 are going out that leaves 7 people in row...
I talked to Pittman.
Marko,Quickshot and Eclipso for going oversize...
That's just me. We'll wait for others...
For this mess only one guy goes out in the next round we have to keep the 6 for the duels and finals...
I say cut them off completely....extensions and exceptions galore just teach people to ignore deadlines. They may have valid reasons, and we've all missed dealines, but at some point a line needs to be drawn.
This is a tourney. More than just two duelists are waiting on these things. I realize I'm not a part of this, but as an observer I think the best thing to do would be to eliminate them and move on.
I'd say the same, but unless the remaining two get in their entries, simply cutting them would mess up the setup.
I'll be honest and I say I don't particularly care either way, though my usual stance of "no exceptions" wants to win out, and I did tell Marko earlier when he realized he messed up the sizes that you generally can't change your entry.
Darkchoco was online yesterday..he's not on everyday, but fairly consistently.
Silent Coyote hasn't posted since the 31st, but was on KMC today. New member. Had trouble remembering his last duel.
I think "extensions and exceptions galore just teach people to ignore deadlines/guidelines" is something keep in mind. Obviously circumstances arise with late entries, but improper entries....
Of course, I'm a participant..but as a general dueler, I think that there are some aspects of duels that should remain immutable. Usually, disregarding criteria means a forefit. I understand that in this instance it would mess up the brackets, but rules NEED to be followed in entries.These are duels, not ffas.
Could we make a stronger emphasis next time that rules are rules?