[QUOTE=8549669]Originally posted by Blaxican In all honesty what point do we have trying to put the various Theorists in here down? Is this not the Conspiracy forum, a place for you to post conspiracies? I notice a lot of people coming in here just to point out how stupid these people and there conspiracies are. Who are we to tell them to stop posting conspiracies in the conspiracy forum?
If you really think all of there conspiracy stuff is BS then just ignore this part of the forum. That's what this forum was created for, right? So the GDF and OTF wouldn't get cluttered with this stuff? [/QUOTE
You're trying to silence us because of your world conquering agenda.
__________________
Graffiti outside Latin class.
Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
A juvenal prank.
I already told him this, his responce was he forgets and posts after the 15 minute limit.
This error is too frequent to say he forgets. Instead he simply doesn't bother. That's my opinion anyway.
Gender: Male Location: The sewers of the Big City!
Then can you explain why they fell like a building does during a demolition. According to the FEMA, the building went through a "Pancake Collapse". You mind posting the science behind that?
__________________
Last edited by Classic NES on Mar 18th, 2007 at 04:30 AM
They were designed to collapse like that. Buildings that tall are not designed so as to collapse sideways and take out entire city blocks. The two towers were designed to fall straight down to reduce damage to nearby buildings.
Mind explaining why the towers shouldn't have collapsed like that?
Gender: Male Location: The sewers of the Big City!
And, to answer your question, it should not have fallen like that because there is no way for floors to fall on floors in a progressive fashion, get smashed into into pieces that fly out of windows and still maintain it's velocity I.E. how did the collapse reach terminal velocity while having it's mass objectively changed?
EDIT: if your going to respond, please do it in the new thread I made.
Gender: Male Location: between apathy and indifference
All skyscrapers are designed with potential structural collapse in mind. If they weren't they would have to be placed the distance of their height aeay from each other. Stop reading conspicay websites and research architecture.
__________________ "I made a typo bif deal" - JacopeX
yeah people need to stop living in a fantasy world that the towers collapsed due to fire.Its funny how you can view videos of where demolition experts have set off explosives to blow up buildings and in all those videos they show the same thing that the buildings topple down in a freefall manner in the same EXACT way the towers fell.Yet people cant deal with it that they were lied to,that the towers fell due to explosives going off.Pitiful.
thats hysterical on his flimsy point about architecture.That means nothing because it was the first time in history that a scyscraper collapsed due to fire even though the other towers were subjected to far more intense heat and burned for hours without collapsing.Not only that,you can also view pics of those buildings where bombs were set off to bring down the buildings and the place looks like a war zone,you view pics of skyscrapers in california that collapsed due to earthquakes,those buildings remained intact and collapsed sideways,yet the in new york,you view all the photos of the towers collapse,in just like the photos of buildings that blown up,new york looks like a war zone as well unlike the towers in california that collapsed due to earthquakes.some people just dont want to learn the truth though.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Mar 19th, 2007 at 07:23 PM
1) It was not just fire that caused the collapse, you have a Boeing 767 flying 500 mph into the side of the building. Certainly you consider that when arguing about the forces that caused the collapse? Oh wait, you didn't. Apparently it's not important enough.
2)Call my opinions pitiful all you want, if it makes you feel better. Just fyi, I could care less what you think. This from the guy who is always criticizing others for resorting to insults?
3) An Earthquake did not bring down the towers, a Boeing 767 flying 500 mph slamming into the side of the tower and the subsequent burning of the jet fuel did. Don't compare apples to oranges, please.
4) A warzone? Elaborate please. What did you expect, exactly? Two neat piles of debris? Of course the area is going to look like a warzone. Two towers each over 1,000 feet tall collapsing can do that to an area, especially a congested area like a city.
5) Enough with your "people don't want to learn the truth" crap. It's your opinion, nothing else. Because I don't think like you doesn't mean I'm wrong; I have my opinions.
I hate them when they say we don't want to learn the truth,Well bullshit, we just don't believe in your shit. But I do believe in the conspiracy of 9/11.
Anyway I am new here but PARKER HAS PISSED ME OFF ALREADY.
kinda like how stupid the governments 9-11 conspiracy is that it was Muslins and Bin Laden behind it and George Bush is innocent of all this. thats the stupid 9-11 conspiracy you should write about.