Gender: Male Location: US
Currently: Eating chicken?
No. There are signs that point to him living, and signs that point to him dying. I really don't care either way, because it's a book, but I just think writing 7 books, only to have the main character die at the end is some huge anticlimax. It's not exactly the best thing she could do. I'd rather have Cliche than anticlimax.
Gender: Male Location: US
Currently: Eating chicken?
Impossible. The prophecy states that the only one who can rival Voldemort is Harry. Assuming the prophecy is right, if Harry were to die, or kill himself, Voldemort would still be alive. This would mean that Voldemort wouldn't be killed, and Harry and the Order would be defeated.
Harry also cannot be a Horcrux. Creating a Horcrux takes complicated magic. We don't know if it's a spell, or a potion, or maybe some type of emotion bond combined with a potion and a spell. We don't know the exact details. However, we do know that it's impossible for Harry to be a Horcrux, because he was never in the vicinity of Voldemort long enough for him to have made a Horcrux out of him, sparing the graveyard.
However,Harry would've noticed if part of Voldemort's soul was branded inside of him during Goblet. Also, Crazy V probably wouldn't make a Horcrux in front of anybody, regardless of their loyalty towards him.
So, in conclusion, Harry probably won't die, and he's not a Horcrux.
Gender: Male Location: Past the Point of No Return
I wont go on either side of the whole horcrux thing till I see details on what happened at Godric's Hollow. I wanna see what spell Voldemort used. (Just because it was green doesn't making it the killing curse.)
__________________
Thank you Neha for the sig!
This years Musical: Little Shop of Horrors (sig for it hopefully coming soon)
Harry does not have to kill himself to kill the dark lord but it is possible that he will die after kililng Voldemort.Also to write seven books and to h ave the main chactor die at the end of the last book makes sence to me.
Alot of writters attend to do that.It is not un normal for the writter to kill the hero.I would not care if she did or not.Harry to me is not one of my favorites I go for the bad guys in books.No reason!jm
It could still be wrong because i read in another forum that harry must and i quote have to sacrifice himself to rebound the killing curse upon Voldemort thus ridding them all of Voldemort but also Harry
Okey, first of all. JM, your speling sucks. Second of all, chances of Harry being the last Horcrux seem impossible to me.
Think of it! Voldemort killed Lily, James and then wanted to place a Horcrux in the exact same person who has the biggest chance of killing him? Remember, that once the spell backfired on Voldemort he almost died, and remained only as simple spirit or ghost.
Doing so, Voldemort put himself at risk of being competely killed. Anyone could have killed him at such a weak word. Adding to that, in Slughorn's memory we have also seen that in order for a Horcrux to be put into an object, then the caster has to say a special spell. Most of our evidence state that Voldemort used the Avada Kadavra spell on Harry. Thus his name as the only boy who has ever survived the killing spell.
And anyway, wasn't there a huge story about how J.K.Rowling finished the book, but then some critic or something who was important or something told Rowling that she shouldn't make a mistake such as that? And people think that the mistake that the critic was pointing at is that she killed someone important.
I doubt that it would be.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~
I dont get this.If Harry had seen the curse then Hp should have been able to see the (oh..I forgot its name) animal that you can see only after you've seen death.I mean he did see his parents death.Didn't he?Then why couldn't he see them before his end-of-4th year
__________________
♥♥♥
Last edited by PrincessNk on Apr 15th, 2007 at 07:20 PM