You apparently misunderstand Nazism (the socio-politico movement). Hitler also litterally resurrected German society from the complete devastation wrecked upon it by the "oh so good and liberal" British, French, and US" and resotred national pride.
This sort of crap just represents a fundamental misunderstanding of how politics works from the pot-smoking apathetic "liberal" wing.
you shouldnt come to conclusions about people by simply reading one post. i do not IN THE LEAST, CONSIDER THE BRITISH, FRENCH AND AMERICANS as good or LIBERAL{in the true sense of the word}. they are facist regimes{atleast partially} hidden under the flag of democracy and capitalism. they are run by manipulaytive, ignorant, fundamentalist self centred basytards who if given hitelr's platform and socioeconomic conditions would wreak far more havok than he did. thas a given for any1 who has read or tries to understand these issues open mindedly. i do understand the "sociopolitical" ASPECT of the movement thouroughly. but i would tell you and all others not to look at it from that stand point, the sociopolitical situation was simply an aspect that FACILITATED the ideological movement known as nazism, and the sociopolitical situation's evolution under hitler was a PRODUCT of the idological movement, its an extension not a fundamental. there are major political/economic causes which ALLOWED{facilitated} such an extreme ideology to emmerge and progress and i admit that in the absence of nazism, another equally extreme philosophy could have emerged. but NAZISM as seen by hitler, his followers and the third reich was not simply an effect or PHENOMENON that emerged as a result of the socioeconomic position{as u state} but it was an active philosophy created and followed actively by hitler, the third reich and most of germany. in my humble oppinion the mistake your making {and infact many other philosophers, writers and marxists make[and im not implying your a marxists or not] } is one of cause and effect , nazism wasnt the socioeconomic movement, but the socioeconomic movement was the effect of the idiological movement known as nazism, ofcourse politics and social change were at the centre of the philosophy's PRACTICAL PART, and was very much connected. it wasnt a FUNDAMENTAL of the movement. ofcourse this question is more vague to answer than ive made it seem here due to wilhelm neitche's philosophy being so brutally inclined towardds being NON philosophical and practical.
i do admit that hitler resurrected germany from the ashes but that isnt very hard to do when you have a nation of followers forsaken by the world on whole and use illegal means military or otherwise to launder money from accross europe to germany practically bleeding most of europe's economies dry which was made easy by the fact that no world power was in the beginning willing enough to care for the crisis as long as it didnt touch them and let hitler continue his work. also later on if you have practically a nation of slave labourers working in endless supply and endless hours in inhuman unpaid labour with not even the benefit of clothes or surviveable food than its pretty easy to keep the high production rates up{specially since uve also stolen all the raw materials without paying a cent}.
please dont tell me that you think hitler lifted the economy through increasing the industrial or agricultural productivity of his nation by his SOCIOECONOMIC changes to his nation using just the honest jerman nationals.
are u even aware of the reasoning behind the acts of nazi's and hitler? Neitche. the official philosopher of the nazi movements was one of the deepest thinkers and idealistics in the philosophical world, along with hitler who was flat out a fundamentalist{although what he fundamentally followed might be a little debateable, but it certainly wasnt interpreting and taking advantage of the economic condition or sociol condition for personal gains} in all of neitche's books from Morgenröte. "Gedanken über die moralischen Vorurteile" discussing morals. or "Also Sprach Zarathustra" romantically displaying the death of god through the end of the journey of an enlightened zoaraster, one finds an IDEOLOGY very different from MARX or HEGEL or even ARISTOTLE which had in healthy amounts, the attempt to discover emperical scientific truths{which could be directly connected to economy and the social situation and its evolution} it is in the true sense an IDEOLOGY based on faith, belief , and adhesion, not an understanding of sociology or economics as a science and following through with that.
Gender: Male Location: Drifting off around the bend
A "Christian" unable to make significant statements. His manner was Biblical quote with extremely minimal personal statement. By comparison, your manner so far is Hitler quote with extremely minimal personal statement. You are the Hitler version of the same manner, while making decent quotations still unable to make significant statements.
Gender: Male Location: Drifting off around the bend
I believe so, regardless of your personal view of your behavior on this forum. If you do not wish to be considered such, you need to begin presenting more of yourself and less quotation without adequate commentary.
Also, I do not think you are him, you merely have the same manner. I believe JIA would have a difficult time learning German as from my experiences with him, he may believe English to be the language of God *once again facetious*
__________________
Robbin' from the rich to give to themselves
Last edited by Regret on Apr 1st, 2007 at 06:11 PM
Gender: Male Location: Drifting off around the bend
Thanks. If you come back, just use more of your own commentary, quoting others does not always lead to a clear perception by others. Also, avoid vulgarity, such is not appropriate for gentlemen and ladies at any time.
I agree. I read Mein Kempf. Read some books on the rising of Germany - truly intresting stuff. But please make your own comments. If we don't understand how you read it, then it won't make sense to post it.
Oh and please use paragraph breaks people! Geez
__________________ "Where ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise." - Thomas Gray
KMC Community Forums
Apr 1st, 2007 03:29 PM
Universal education is the most corroding and disintegrating poison that liberalism has ever invented for its own destruction.
