It seems, at least to me, that drawing an arbitrary line that constitutes a "clear majority" isn't the way to go. It becomes pretty subjective at that point.
The voting is pretty much over, and there are 7 more votes for Batman being bumped than against.
I referenced the 2/1 ratio because that was the ratio we had, not because that is what is needed for a vote to pass. Big difference.
And to be perfectly honest, you have no place saying that something "no longer applies" in an accusatory tone before a character has been decided upon. No decision has been made on Batman. None. So tell me, how do you justify saying "seems to me those words no longer apply when Batman is up for a vote" when you literally have no clue whether or not they do? Not only is it illogical, it's insulting.
And yes, it is putting words in my mouth, because I've repeated ad nauseum that there isn't a set percentage required, that the list was wrecked when we did briefly try a set percentage, and that each vote is decided upon individually.
As it is, the last page and a half of everyone ignoring my last post, warning to keep things on topic and civil, has proven to me what needs to be done. Batman is being removed from the list entirely.
So I'll repeat this:
And then say that any further concerns should be sent to me via PM. I won't have this thread spammed any longer over a ridiculous argument spawned from an arbitrary placement of a character that would be just as well off in either tier.
KMC Community Forums
Sep 9th, 2009 05:41 PM
