I'm right. You're wrong. Live with it. Some people's opinions are more worthy than others...that's what you gotta understand.
And I still think you need to think about the differnce between subjective taste and opinion. You can't help what your taste is, but you can help your opinion is.
__________________
Last edited by EPIIIBITES on Apr 16th, 2007 at 04:53 PM
If you can do no more than claim you have one of my nuggets (Odd, if you ask me.), then either show us what this supposed irony is, or stop saying it, as I said before and you couldn't keep up with.
Why do you assume I'm having trouble living with it? We're in a thread discussing it, so I'm discussing it.
You have trouble with it being wrong, which I constantly and undeniably prove. You just tried to argue with the dictionary by saying fact isn't truth, I proved you wrong again. So if living in ignorance of the differences between fact and opinion, objectivity and subjectivity makes you happy, then do so, just don't expect your arguments to be treated with respect, and don't act like we're the ones misunderstanding you when overwhelming proof is against you.
ah that! well i found it rather self-evident, but i guess we can't all sit at the big kids table.
you are among the least understanding, least accomodating people on this board. i found it ironic that you would berate me for taking the majority stance on the subject. and with a statement not only violating itself (coming to an understanding would imply a majority, wouldn't it) but violating your entire persona and debate style.
You confuse being articulate and clear enough to coincide with messageboard etiquette and courtesy, with accomodating to and catering FOR, the members here. Courtesy and etiquette is typing in a readable manner, making coherent points and clearing up misunderstandings. Catering for is accepting incorrect claims, stances and views simply because you "get" what they mean.
I get what it means to say "This is crap!", but it doesn't retract from the fact that it's cutting corners and a lazy way of essentially saying "This isn't as credible.", where you find it hard to tell the difference between credibility and quality.
I did just say that the reason why you might not be so keen to say it is because you didn't look before you leapt, and I was right.
That's a stupid, illogical and ridiculous argument as everything points to you being wrong, factually. This is precisely why it's silly and discourteous for you to debate from such a point.
If you act like an idiot I'll call you one.
Respect is earned. If you haven't earned mine, you won't get it. I don't owe you respect. Like I said, if you want your opinion to be respected, stop saying shit like:
"I think truths exists regardless of being proven factually.".
you know, people with even a blue-collar knowledge of debating as an art see you like glass. this might be why whirly used to have such a blast with you.
Ok. And you can't prove that killing is wrong...so then I guess it's really not. And I guess I shouldn't say s*&% like "killing is wrong", 'casue that'd be stupid right?
Please.
Just 'casue you can't prove something, doesn't mean it's not true.
__________________
Last edited by EPIIIBITES on Apr 16th, 2007 at 05:22 PM
KMC Community Forums
Apr 16th, 2007 04:47 PM
