Gender: Unspecified Location: Lost in a Roman Wilderness of Pain
I know that by giving these short replies you attempt to appear as though everything I say is so irrelevant that you will not even bother giving a detailed response but in reality it just looks like you are accepting you were wrong all along. So unless you are willing to give detailed responses to my posts just refrain from answering my posts altogether.
If I am rude, immature and whiny then prove me wrong, please, prove me wrong. It's an amusing game we are playing.
__________________ "Progress is man's ability to complicate simplicity." — Thor Heyerdahl
Do you not understand that you believe it exists based on nothing besides "Oh, I want to believe that."? Then you are applying it by telling OTHER PEOPLE they listen to factually bad or good music.
You don't have that right. Especially when a universal truth that DOES exist, not "I think...", but does, says that taste is subjective. As is quality of music. Quality exists, but the extent of that quality is subjective.
You believe a universal truth exists, yet the very fact that we can deny your claims proves it doesn't. Fact is truth.
Thing is, nobody can prove that quality in music is subjective...as much as I can't prove it isn't. It comes down to what you believe is the case about good and bad music. Facts can't always prove the truth.
Funny how all anyone has done here is try and pretend that what they believe in is the truth, and that what I believe in isn't...simply becasue they don't like what I believe in, and think that for some reason it's not alright to think how I do (but it is alright to think how they do) when really, it all comes down to a fundamental disagreement about truth.
...oh, and the obvious has been stated about something that doesn't even appply to the argument. TASTE is subjective.
Oh thanks. All that means is now I know I'm right when I say I like Mozart!
__________________
Last edited by EPIIIBITES on Apr 17th, 2007 at 01:11 AM
No, nobody can convince YOU that music quality is subjective because you're an ignorant fool who refuses to admit he is wrong now that he has come this far with the belief.
No matter how much you are proven wrong, nobody can force you to admit that, just prove it.
I have no problem with you believing something I don't like if it's a subjective argument, it's not though. You are factually wrong, but you won't admit it, and you think that by continuing to IGNORE fact, you are refuting fact, and thus proving it to not be true. That's not the case.
I'm not factually wrong, because there are no facts you can provide to prove I'm wrong.
As much as you're gonna try to scream at the top of your lungs that there's facts you can apply to this argument, you won't be able to find facts to prove your point, cause there are none.
Accept it.
Just like you can't prove that the pop artists I've mentioned are crap. I say they're not.
__________________
Last edited by EPIIIBITES on Apr 17th, 2007 at 01:18 AM
KMC Community Forums
Apr 16th, 2007 09:55 PM
