CIS implies stupidity and not necessarily non-optimal fighting. There is a big difference.
I'm fine with SS, as long as someone doesn't claim he will accelerate to light speed or beyond in less than 2 seconds in a forum battle.
Stubborn aren't you. So hard to concede to the obvious or the more likely.
Originally posted by h1a8
When did I say that eternity can't hurt juggernaut? I think you got me mistaken. But thinking about it, the only way eternity can physically hurt Juggs is if he somehow takes away his enchantment or alters his being (Indirectly). The crimson bands of cyttorak that surrounds Juggs are of the same strength that holds the universe together. So unless Eternity is powerful enough to break the bonds of the universe then he cannot physically and directly hurt Juggs.
What's wrong with the above statement? I gave an if then scenario.
I never said that Eternity couldn't physically hurt Juggs. I just gave the only possible ways that Eternity can do it. So what's funny? You guy's intelligence scares me.
Unless a character is consistently shown to be an optimal strategist, CIS and the "in character" stipulation mean that I would place my money on performances being non-optimal.
Seeing as you were the one who brought up the above point to use in your non-existent debate that SS is a slow starter, I highly doubt that the exact situation above may be claimed, although all such occurences save the IG incident have a degree of ambiguity. It is still within his powerset, though.
Apparently, a spirit and a soul are different in comics even though comic circumstances should have them be the same. The word hyperspace itself has been used differently in multiple instances. I am simply looking to substantiate your claim. If it is obvious outside of Star Trek terminology, as you said, it should not be too difficult, should it?
KMC Community Forums
Jun 19th, 2008 10:44 PM
Pure comedy.
just kidding 
