Still as I said Kyoto is a good start, now we need to expand it.
1)Polluted water supplies.
2)Worsening air quality levels.
3)Overfilled Landfills, so bad people are fighting where to put the garbage.
4)Species important to our ecosystem like bees dying off.
5)Rising Cancer rates, so much so it's about to become the number 1 killer.
And once again, do you have any prove for this that would remove all doubt from people like me? Prove that speaks out against the scientific community that disagrees with you? None of which are right winged extremists.
And the ozon is restoring itself, the rising cancer rate has nothing to do with that. It has other issues, but poverty is still the number one killer in the world. What do you want to do about that? Except for destroying economical growth in those country's?
I notice you didn't actually address these points.
Still as I said Kyoto is a good start, now we need to expand it.
How would you fix these problems?
1)Polluted water supplies.
2)Worsening air quality levels.
3)Overfilled Landfills, so bad people are fighting where to put the garbage.
4)Species important to our ecosystem like bees dying off.
5)Rising Cancer rates, so much so it's about to become the number 1 killer. Melanoma rates are rising, this is a form of cancer contracted through UV exposure. http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/cancer/melanoma.html
This is not only the most hypocritical post out there but also one of the most memorable as you actually posted a source. See it isn't that hard...
Still the ozone layer is restoring it self. Pollution of the water can be prevented by cleaner ways of dealing with the water. Which costs money which requires the economy. Kyoto doesn't deal with this issue by the way.
Overfilled landfills, can also be handled by very expensive techniques to put garbage into energy, which of course requires money.
Species dying has happened all the time, and bees are on the rise in this country. So I wouldn't say they are dying because of global warming, if they are dying it might have a million reasons. Prove the two are related and I might address the issue.
At the same time I would like to ask you once again,
Prove that the scientists that don't support the IPCC are wrong, and no saying they are right winged won't help because they are not.
And then come up with workable solutions that won't kill millions of people in the progress. As cancer might be a growing cause of death, the first and most important cause of death anywhere in the world is still poverty and everything related to that.
Ozone depletion and global warming have tenuous linkage. The ozone hole is repairing. Having been told this at least 5 to 10 times already and still squawking about melanoma rates and trying to allude a link to Kyoto, you deserve to be called a retard, retard.
You haven't given a solution to those problems yet. You just wanted to destroy the economy of every nation on this planet and kill millions if not a billion people in the progress... Your excuse for this is that people will die anyway. And at least Canada will be safe.
Now I have given solutions, they aren't perfect. But at least they would do something and they wouldn't kill billions of people. Besides the only real important issue is global warming, as the ozone is repairing it self and the other things can be handled over time if we just take the necessary precautions. Now seeing as Global warming still hasn't been completely attributed to human beings I think it's insane to kill so many people.
I notice you didn't actually address these points.
Still as I said Kyoto is a good start, now we need to expand it.
How would you fix these problems?
1)Polluted water supplies.
2)Worsening air quality levels.
3)Overfilled Landfills, so bad people are fighting where to put the garbage.
4)Species important to our ecosystem like bees dying off.
5)Rising Cancer rates, so much so it's about to become the number 1 killer. Melanoma rates are rising, this is a form of cancer contracted through UV exposure. http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/cancer/melanoma.html
No Global Warming is NOT the only problem. Your soultion won't help enough, these are serious issues that need to be addressed in a serious way.
And if UV exposure isn't a problem why are the rates of Melanoma rising? A type of cancer contracted by UV exposure.
This is not only the most hypocritical post out there but also one of the most memorable as you actually posted a source. See it isn't that hard...
Still the ozone layer is restoring it self. Pollution of the water can be prevented by cleaner ways of dealing with the water. Which costs money which requires the economy. Kyoto doesn't deal with this issue by the way.
Overfilled landfills, can also be handled by very expensive techniques to put garbage into energy, which of course requires money.
Species dying has happened all the time, and bees are on the rise in this country. So I wouldn't say they are dying because of global warming, if they are dying it might have a million reasons. Prove the two are related and I might address the issue.
At the same time I would like to ask you once again,
Prove that the scientists that don't support the IPCC are wrong, and no saying they are right winged won't help because they are not.
And then come up with workable solutions that won't kill millions of people in the progress. As cancer might be a growing cause of death, the first and most important cause of death anywhere in the world is still poverty and everything related to that.
Now stop ignoring my posts. You aren't going to be able to do shit about anything with your idiotic idea's. You are just going to kill millions if not billions.
This is not only the most hypocritical post out there but also one of the most memorable as you actually posted a source. See it isn't that hard...
Still the ozone layer is restoring it self. Pollution of the water can be prevented by cleaner ways of dealing with the water. Which costs money which requires the economy. Kyoto doesn't deal with this issue by the way.
Overfilled landfills, can also be handled by very expensive techniques to put garbage into energy, which of course requires money.
Species dying has happened all the time, and bees are on the rise in this country. So I wouldn't say they are dying because of global warming, if they are dying it might have a million reasons. Prove the two are related and I might address the issue.
At the same time I would like to ask you once again,
Prove that the scientists that don't support the IPCC are wrong, and no saying they are right winged won't help because they are not.
And then come up with workable solutions that won't kill millions of people in the progress. As cancer might be a growing cause of death, the first and most important cause of death anywhere in the world is still poverty and everything related to that.
It adresses everything, we need money to do it. It's as simple as that. And cancer might be a problem, the ozone layer however is restoring it self and more people still die because of poverty.
Your solutions were abstractions, care to give specifics on how you would accomplish those? And by cleaner water I assume you mean not dumping their waste into our water supplies?
You left out polluted air supplies, So if not through taxes, where would you get the money to fix these problems?
And Bees may be on the increase in your country but they are on a steady decline in the majority of the world. And sans a world altering event, most species were wiped out due to acts of mankind.
And yet again, if UV exposure isn't a problem why are the rates of Melanoma rising? A type of cancer contracted by UV exposure.
And your very naive if you think scientists are immune from having political biases.
And you are very naive if you think I am going to answer any of your statements without evidence. You are a liar and a hypocrite as proven in another thread, I have no reason to believe anything you say here without statistics and links to official sources until you provide such things I will only answer what I know is true.
I may have left out polluted air, but once again you can not stop pollution unless you invest money, and you would need an economy to get money. Destroying the economy to fix problems would eventually result in a rebuilding economy doing exactly the same as the human standard of living is far more important then the air we have.
Besides do I seriously need to remind you again, that the leading cause of death in the world is still poverty and everything related to that. And that the only reason people can die from cancer instead of something else like poverty is because of our high standard of living? Or do you think we can still magically easily reach 70 if we destroy our economy?
KMC Community Forums
May 14th, 2007 03:41 AM
Ozone depletion and global warming have tenuous linkage. The ozone hole is repairing. Having been told this at least 5 to 10 times already and still squawking about melanoma rates and trying to allude a link to Kyoto, you deserve to be called a retard, retard.
