Like I said, I like the other 3 because it was less noticeable and I am a old school Indy fan/Spielburg. If i wanted to see some Lucas's CGI then I would watch Star Wars. Although the parts that were not CGI I think they are great.
__________________
Last edited by The Nuul on May 21st, 2008 at 02:38 PM
Yeah, I didn't like the CGI. I hoped this film would be like the old ones, that you could watch TLC and KOTCS after eachother, and wouldn't notice the change too much. Indiana Jones is great because it doesn't need CGI to look great and take you on an adventure.
Of course things have changed. But I hoped they wouldn't use that much. But there are some things in the movie that's not classic Indiana Jones. They just had to do it big.
Whenever I am conscious that Im watching CGI, I know theres no threat.
Ergo, no threat in this movie.
__________________
"Anyway, based on what we've seen, Van Zan, with five punches and a headbutt, couldn't even put down a malnourished dude (malnourished guy vigorous enough to be needed to be held back by 3 people). He's definitely not taking down McClane." - Lestov16
"Anyway, based on what we've seen, Van Zan, with five punches and a headbutt, couldn't even put down a malnourished dude (malnourished guy vigorous enough to be needed to be held back by 3 people). He's definitely not taking down McClane." - Lestov16
"Anyway, based on what we've seen, Van Zan, with five punches and a headbutt, couldn't even put down a malnourished dude (malnourished guy vigorous enough to be needed to be held back by 3 people). He's definitely not taking down McClane." - Lestov16
I just clicked back in here to see your response, having forgotten what the thread discussed and it terrified me so badly that I shat all down my leg immediately, when I remembered.
__________________
"Anyway, based on what we've seen, Van Zan, with five punches and a headbutt, couldn't even put down a malnourished dude (malnourished guy vigorous enough to be needed to be held back by 3 people). He's definitely not taking down McClane." - Lestov16
Ooops. Did it again.... Thats the other leg shat now.
__________________
"Anyway, based on what we've seen, Van Zan, with five punches and a headbutt, couldn't even put down a malnourished dude (malnourished guy vigorous enough to be needed to be held back by 3 people). He's definitely not taking down McClane." - Lestov16
"Anyway, based on what we've seen, Van Zan, with five punches and a headbutt, couldn't even put down a malnourished dude (malnourished guy vigorous enough to be needed to be held back by 3 people). He's definitely not taking down McClane." - Lestov16
"Anyway, based on what we've seen, Van Zan, with five punches and a headbutt, couldn't even put down a malnourished dude (malnourished guy vigorous enough to be needed to be held back by 3 people). He's definitely not taking down McClane." - Lestov16
"Anyway, based on what we've seen, Van Zan, with five punches and a headbutt, couldn't even put down a malnourished dude (malnourished guy vigorous enough to be needed to be held back by 3 people). He's definitely not taking down McClane." - Lestov16
KMC Community Forums
May 21st, 2008 02:27 PM
