I am well aware of psy links being possible to block but I was saying I am not aware of Sue ever being able to block one with her shields. I was asking for proof of sue blocking a psy link.
It was a shoot-back for your disrespectful post toward my intelligence. Now you see how it feels.
Yes because storm's telekinesis has to pass through Sue's force field in order to manipulate the weather on the outside of the shield. This is why it would not make much of a difference if storm was on the outside because the energy would have to pass through her shield again in order to manipulate the weather on the inside of her shield.
Now in order to counter this you would have to bring us solid proof of sue being able to block either a psionic link or storm's control on the inside of the shield.
What I've proven is that it doesn't matter what side storm is on because that didn't matter in that feat, either side this had to do with storm's telekinesis going through her shield.
Oh ok now i see what you mean but, blocking storm's winds have little to do with her link going through IW's shield because wind energy is different from storm's telekinetic link to control the weather.
No i spelled philosophy correct but, i did how ever responded to the wrong meaning of fallacy
Oh so it's ok for you to make up rules not to disrespect you and it's ok for you to disrespect people?
ok gotcha
So your calling the feat "speculatory" when there is a scan provided to prove this point?
Then i stand corrected and apologise for thinking you were someone else. I'm also not IW hater and don't see what facts lead you to that conclusion. I'm well aware of Sue's abilities and know that she cannot block all kinds of energy. Also please don't refer feats such as jean that deal with telekinesis to Sue's because they're abilities are different as well as they're shields
Ok this argument is not a matter of opinion, these are facts being brought to the table that actually "Prove" that storm possesses the ability to do what was brought up. What does "They don't agree that this character is the god/goddess I perceive them to be they must hate the character!" have to do with anything in this argument? I assumed you were someone you were not(that is a storm hater) because you were bringing infactual evidence into the argument in order to dismiss the feat that storm has performed in the scan.
__________________ An eternity of suffering is the fate of those who challenge the Gods.
Last edited by The Weather God on Dec 11th, 2007 at 02:19 AM
It's ok, Weather God. I've already asked Digi to interviene in the spamming of this thread by Cresh.
It's funny how he uses the Double-standard fallacy by usng probability with regard to Sue blocking Storm's psi link by citing Jean as an example which would circumstantial evidence. Then he turns around and wants "concrete proof", when, in essence, both arguments are probabilistic.
Appeal to Ignorance as well.
It's sad.
It just shows his bias.
__________________
Storm summons the power of the ENTIRE CORE!! UXM-165
Last edited by 2damnloud on Dec 11th, 2007 at 02:29 AM
I'm still not seeing the need. you're still relying on the affirming the consequent.
Nah, I don't give a rat's ass about you correcting my spelling especially after you spelled philosophy the way you did.. I noticed you edited your post too...
You have yet to prove its the same... until then its affirming the consequent.
and equivocation.
Naw, I don't need to prove anything until you've proven your side. Invalid arguments are not proof.
You know you keep using that word, but it doesn't meadn what you think it means...
But.. you just proved that not all energy is the same and she can choose which she wanted to let through...
Editing your post doesn't count. You spelled it incorrectly. Editing it doesn't change the fact that you did so initially.
Actually I'm going by the forum rules and those that the MODS set up... there isn't a rule that says I have to respect you, I just can't flame you. I don't need to flame you to show you disrespect.
No, I'm calling your interpritation speculatory... People seem to think their opinion is fact... when as you shown above not all energy can just pass through...
What reasoning did you come by to label me as a storm hater?
Also please note that when she uses her sheild but is not invisible, coorelates to her choosing energy to let through when she turns invisible. Her sheild isn't always letting the same energy through all the time.
So please show me where its the same or prove that it was without sue's permission.
No it doesn't. Your speculation on events is not proof... Wishful thinking fallacy.
Said the hypocrite to the person preforming a logic check...
__________________
Last edited by Creshosk on Dec 11th, 2007 at 02:34 AM
Your the one relying on speculation, i'm not even going to bother responding to all these uncalled-for ones.
I edited my post right after i replied and before you posted. I misread the word and noticed after i posted it was not the word i thought it was.
Ok what do you want me to prove? That storm telekinetically controls the weather? That storm has controlled the weather through IW shields?
When did i proved that? I'm asking you to prove that in order to counter the fact that storm can use her power through IW shield.
LoL please go back and read my previous post. I said i thought you were spelling philosophy and responded wrong. XD
Who said anything about forum rules? I said it's ok for you to demand respect and yet you can disrespect people.
It's not speculartory if i'm providing nothing but facts to the table.
I assumed you were someone Who was a storm hater, not you.
Ok i'm asking you to show me proof of that, i'm not going off your hear say as i've asked before.
LoL you have to prove to us that she can, you can't just come into a thread and tell us things without proof. I have never heard of sue being able to see the different energies going through her shield and blocking it.
I've asked you countless times to point out what speculation am i bringing in here. All of what i have said has happened in the scan. You have failed to bring us proof on anything you have been speculating about.
__________________ An eternity of suffering is the fate of those who challenge the Gods.
This is getting closed. Once I have some time, I'll collect the scans in this thread and post them in a new thread. It will be open, but regular members will be unable to post (like the rules thread in the vs. forum). It will remain in the directory, but not be open for discussion.
Not my first choice, but it's a privilege to use the forums, not a right, and this sort of behavior is what loses people that right.
There's too much to sift through, and it would be impossible to go back and try to accredit someone with the first offense, or even the majority of the offense. I have talked to those who needed talking to, and that will end it.
The new thread might be up in days, weeks, months. Depends on my schedule. So don't bug me about it.
KMC Community Forums
Dec 11th, 2007 02:16 AM
