Omg its like saying Cyclops a "BUILDING BUSTER" can beat Supes "a city buster". Its bias Phenominal dont listen to them, if they got unbiased judges who dont hate you or DB you would have one. Come on your argument was much better than his, you countered every single thing he put forward
you know I don't think anyone will be willing to judge one of his matches after this.
Btw Currently the judges vote stand as:
Trickster: for Akuki
Soljer: Abstaining but with a strong indication where he's leaning
Spookysmurph: hasn't voted yet
Illdelph12: hasn't voted yet
You really should make your own thread V2D. But yeah, your thread is going to probably be a bigger rape than this one was. D.S. vs. Pyron would actually be an interesting fight except for the fact that D.S. specializes in Pyron's weakness.
D.S. is Dark Schneider the character that I've being repping against Phenom in this thread. Check my posts in the early portion of the thread if you want to find out info about him.
Phenom you seem to be confused as to the purpose of a debate. It goes like this, you and your opponent both present what you guys consider to be evidence and then the judges decide which party they agree with based on the quality of each participants argument. The fact that Trick agrees with the case made by Akuki doesn't mean that he's biased, it means that he feels that Akuki did a better job overall. You may personally disagree but consider this, if none of the judges agree with your "evidence" then maybe it's not as concrete as you'd like to think. You have to at least consider the possibility that you're assessments of DBZ are wrong otherwise YOU'RE the one that's being unreasonable. And I can tell you now, your opinion regarding DBZ characters in relations to other characters ARE wrong... a lot...a lot lot... in fact I can't remember ever seeing you be right. Anyway bashing Trick and the rest of the judges will accomplish nothing so I suggest that you suck it up and take your loss like a man.
And pr ...
...will you do me a favor and edit anything Phenominal post that continues his case or otherwise serves no purpose other than argue with/berate the judges? The match is over so further arguments from him are against the rules.
__________________
Last edited by darthgoober on Oct 20th, 2007 at 12:10 AM