darthmaul1
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: Canada
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Robtard
Damn, you have shit taste in movies, sir. QoS was good, not as good as CR, but a good flick.
Well i say you have shit taste in movies if you think QoS was good, that was the one of the worst bond films ever. terrible action, editing was shit and boring as all hell.
I think that some actors do films and then they suck in them, but i also think they look at the script and think it will be fun to do and be a part of.
and then there are some that are hard up for cash and will do anything that is thrown at them.
__________________
Aug 13th, 2009 03:07 AM
Robtard
Senor Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Captain's Chair, CA
quote: (post ) Originally posted by darthmaul1
Well i say you have shit taste in movies if you think QoS was good, that was the one of the worst bond films ever. terrible action, editing was shit and boring as all hell..
Na, someone that says "GI Joe was excellent", doesn't get to judge others.
__________________
You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb
Aug 13th, 2009 03:23 AM
dadudemon
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: Bacta Tank.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Robtard
Damn, you have shit taste in movies, sir. QoS was good, not as good as CR, but a good flick.
The action bits in both were a shit ton more realisitic than say, a jackie chan movie. The fights seemed like to pros really street fighting.
I liked the fighting style they had in the film, and the fact the bond gets beat up, bleeds, and gets sweaty like a REALL human would.
Other than that, I thought they were rather boring. Gave them a 6 out of 10, each. Fight scenes, chase scenes, etc. They were all 9s. Excellently done. The rest such as the stories, etc. Kind of boring. Not as good as other bond films.
However, Daniel Craig was the first Bond to actually LOOK like a secret 00 agent. Mad props to him for that.
__________________
Aug 13th, 2009 05:40 AM
Spartan005
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: New York
So I saw G.I. Joe last night.....
The Pros: Awesome action scenes and an overall neat visual style
The Cons: Everything else
__________________
Thanks Vinny!
Aug 13th, 2009 07:31 AM
darthmaul1
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: Canada
quote: (post ) Originally posted by dadudemon
The action bits in both were a shit ton more realisitic than say, a jackie chan movie. The fights seemed like to pros really street fighting.
I liked the fighting style they had in the film, and the fact the bond gets beat up, bleeds, and gets sweaty like a REALL human would.
Other than that, I thought they were rather boring. Gave them a 6 out of 10, each. Fight scenes, chase scenes, etc. They were all 9s. Excellently done. The rest such as the stories, etc. Kind of boring. Not as good as other bond films.
However, Daniel Craig was the first Bond to actually LOOK like a secret 00 agent. Mad props to him for that.
One name for you Sean Connery!
The fights in CR were great, and the action was good, and the story was good, but after they got that down they should of gone back to the gadgets with john cleese as Q in the 2nd one. the whole revenge plots suck in bond movies, and it was like watching a bourne movie. and the humor was missing and you get someone like cleese to replace the original Q and now you don't use him, friggin stupid.
GI JOE reminded me of a bond movie juiced up. and it was great
__________________
Aug 13th, 2009 04:05 PM
Quincy
Debaser
Gender: Male Location: Through The Looking Glass
If only Ray Park wasn't in this movie. Then it'd be good.
__________________
Sig by Scribble
Aug 13th, 2009 04:16 PM
AsbestosFlaygon
The Original One
Gender: Unspecified Location: Hall of Origin
GI Joe is still better than TF2 and Harry Potter 6, though.
When I was watching TF2, I literally was 'facepalming' each of the humor scenes. The humor was a complete fail
And Harry Potter 6... was a complete waste of time and money. I slept halfway through the movie
__________________
"Farewell, Damos... Ash, Pikachu... And you. All of my beloved." -- Arceus
Aug 13th, 2009 05:23 PM
dadudemon
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: Bacta Tank.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by occultdestroyer
And Harry Potter 6... was a complete waste of time and money. I slept halfway through the movie
Reading the book was more "exciting" than the movie.
__________________
Aug 13th, 2009 05:25 PM
Robtard
Senor Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Captain's Chair, CA
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Quincy
If only Ray Park wasn't in this movie. Then it'd be good.
Park's stunt work was just about the only good thing in the film. But you're probably just having a piss in saying that.
__________________
You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb
Aug 13th, 2009 05:31 PM
darthmaul1
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: Canada
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Quincy
If only Ray Park wasn't in this movie. Then it'd be good.
I take it that is an attempt at humor?
Ray Park brought snake eyes to life, he was fantastic as was the whole movie IMO.
__________________
Aug 13th, 2009 06:01 PM
Squirrel Fart
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Canada
Park did well as Snake Eyes, hes the best Joe in the movie and did the best acting for them.
__________________
Aug 13th, 2009 06:13 PM
Robtard
Senor Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Captain's Chair, CA
quote: (post ) Originally posted by The Nuul
Park did well as Snake Eyes, hes the best Joe in the movie and did the best acting for them.
Considering he didn't have a single spoken word and the quality of the others, I agree.
__________________
You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb
Aug 13th, 2009 06:14 PM
BruceSkywalker
The BatLord of the Jedi
Gender: Male Location: The Batcave
quote: (post ) Originally posted by darthmaul1
I take it that is an attempt at humor?
Ray Park brought snake eyes to life, he was fantastic as was the whole movie IMO.
hey who fits Ray Park the best... Snake Eyes or Darth Maul?
__________________
THE TRIAL NEVER ENDS...thanks steve
Aug 13th, 2009 06:59 PM
Quincy
Debaser
Gender: Male Location: Through The Looking Glass
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Robtard
Park's stunt work was just about the only good thing in the film. But you're probably just having a piss in saying that.
Yep pretty much just playing around.
I did that in another thread and forgot about it and I got hate messages for it.
__________________
Sig by Scribble
Aug 13th, 2009 07:36 PM
Darth Martin
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location:
quote: (post ) Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
hey who fits Ray Park the best... Snake Eyes or Darth Maul?
Good question. Snake Eyes doesn't speak. Park doesn't voice Maul either so...........
Both were show stealers for both there respective films.
I'd say it's literally dead even.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by darthmaul1
I loved everything about this movie, was like watchin James Bond on Steroids, it was a blast. and after the last bond film (piece of crap)
Speak for yourself. Quantum of Solace shits on G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra in every area.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Quincy
If only Ray Park wasn't in this movie. Then it'd be good.
Last edited by Darth Martin on Aug 13th, 2009 at 07:55 PM
Aug 13th, 2009 07:45 PM
darthmaul1
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: Canada
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Darth Martin
Good question. Snake Eyes doesn't speak. Park doesn't voice Maul either so...........
Both were show stealers for both there respective films.
I'd say it's literally dead even.
Speak for yourself. Quantum of Solace shits on G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra in every area.
I loved both characters and its dead even, but with maul at least you saw his face and eyes even though it was painted and he had contacts.
IMO GI JOE shits on QoS in every area.
__________________
Aug 13th, 2009 09:11 PM
Darth Martin
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location:
quote: (post ) Originally posted by darthmaul1
I loved both characters and its dead even, but with maul at least you saw his face and eyes even though it was painted and he had contacts.
That and the fact that Snake Eyes had the "film-induced mouth". They both were some of the only redeeming qualities in ther movies though.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by darthmaul1
IMO GI JOE shits on QoS in every area.
Would those include music, acting, and scenery. IMO QOS is one of the best Bond films. #2 on my list with Casino Royale being the best. Just my opinion, and I know it might not be the majority but I know the material. I'm a huge Bond fan and have seen most of the movies.
G.I. Joe to me had some of the worst CGI along with Wolverine this year. You could tell those vehicles underwater were fake. As bad as Transformers 2 may have been. I can't say the same for it's CGI. It was top knotch. Same for Terminator Salvation and Star Trek. These films had great CGI and thats primarily what it advertised. CGI is pretty much solely what C.I. Joe advertised and IMO it failed.
Pros
-Snake Eyes
-Action scene in Paris w/ Accelerator Suits
-Hot Women
Cons
-Everything else and trust me, it's a damn long laundry list.
Aug 14th, 2009 12:16 AM
BruceSkywalker
The BatLord of the Jedi
Gender: Male Location: The Batcave
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Darth Martin
Good question. Snake Eyes doesn't speak. Park doesn't voice Maul either so...........
Both were show stealers for both there respective films.
I'd say it's literally dead even.
i agree with you
__________________
THE TRIAL NEVER ENDS...thanks steve
Aug 14th, 2009 12:16 AM
dadudemon
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: Bacta Tank.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Darth Martin
Good question. Snake Eyes doesn't speak. Park doesn't voice Maul either so...........
INCORRECT!
Maul spoke in TPM.
__________________
Aug 14th, 2009 12:27 AM
SnakeEyes
Connoisseur
Gender: Male Location: AMERICA
It wasn't Ray Park's voice though.
__________________
"Nothing is ever as good as you can imagine it."
Aug 14th, 2009 12:31 AM
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
Text-only version