Queeq: Please play childminder here and remind JAC that I asked if he would resurrect the argument in the thread it belongs in, cheers.
JAC: I appreciate that you have taken the time to realise that there is no absolute answer for the question you posed. Realise, however, that there are questions relevant to that discussion which you failed to answer or acknowledge in anyway - whereas I had the proof in ambudance for those questions, which shed light on the discussion and thus give, while not a definitive answer to the problem, a relatively sound solution. Open up the thread if ya want to talk silly.
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Living my life, fighting my war.
Hey, you're the one who returned to THAT discussion. I was content to make a tiny passing refrence in order to show my attempt to change my ways, and leave it at that, you, however, seem determined to continue taht discussion. On the topic of that demised discussion, however, I myself shall say no more. good day.
Of course I returned to the discussion. It is the only one you have actually participated in without quoting others and agreeing. It is also the one where your argument is - I'm even sorry to say this - weak.