they could have bought eddie back , returned gargan as scoprion(which i think they should do) and let spiderman be with his recent build up of story & powers without resorting to BND!
I have all the right to assume the worst. I mean, who makes a topic stating a fact and NOT posting any proof? You don't create a thread saying "Spider-Man 4 WILL feature Kraven the Hunter" and then say "I don't have a link, just wait til 20XX and you'll see whether I'm right or wrong."
And I still can't get past the link you provided being a link about a story arc that came out in 2007 and posting it as if that link confirmed Eddie Brock was coming back as Venom in the here-&-now. You have no proof to provide, fine. But don't get so desperate that you'll scavenge any website for an unrelated link just to save face. BTW, I was one of the 1st people on SHH to post that info regarding "The Last Temptation of Eddie Brock", the story arc you chose to base the "BND/Venom" claim on, which has nothing to do with said claim.
Now, if you do have some proof, that's fine. I won't apologize (just so you know ahead of time) because you should have posted proof to begin with, and apologizing or congratulating you for something you should have done by default is bass ackwards. But as far as where you stand, your claim that old Venom is coming back without proof is about as credible as when wikipedia said Eddie Brock would get the symbiote back BEFORE the theatical release of Spider-Man 3...
Now, I'll chill with the attitude, but I stand where I am. Now I'm off to create a thread called "Master Chief Is Going To Be In Smash Bros. 4!!! - I have no proof!!!" and I expect 3 pages of posts.
I never bashed anyone, just the idea of...ya know, this is getting nowhere. I never bashed him, nor did I say Eddie Brock won't return, but this topic could have & would have worked if the title was "Spider-Man vs. the Thunderbolts - Eddie Brock COULD Return as Venom" and it was a speculation topic. My issue isn't that I don't believe Eddie COULD become Venom again, but how he chose to annouce this 'fact' and convienently decided NOT to give us proof. Either we just accept it because he tells us to, or wait until the event itself (which we could have done anyway, further proving why this should have been a speculation topic and not an "officially true" topic)
I guess no one else minds seeing a "Eddie Brock Is Going To Return!!!!" topic and after reading the 1st post, getting slapped in the face after having their hopes up. But since you guys don't mind, I'll let you cats continue to blindly go along with this. Heh..."Eddie Brock is coming back! I'm definately, probably sure." What the...? That didn't accomplish anything! We're BACK WHERE WE STARTED! I wanna go home...
i understand were that aggresive guy is coming from if you had put false evidence on the thead that was wrong and i think you should probaly apoligize, however on the other hand if the aggresive guy is wrong i think he should apoligize to you ok?
Once again fair point, TBH most of us are so fed up of Gargan that anything regardless of if it is a lie about Eddies return, we get hyped up about it, after all thats all we have; since we are on the subject who's bright idea was it to get rid of eddie in the first place?
Don't see why. It still bonded with Spiderman so if it rebonded with eddie, the results should be the same.
Anyway, if I don't find a source by tommorrow evening, I'm giving up. I already have a hunch as to what happened, but I'm not sure about it yet so wait.
Anyway, I'm going to get off now. I have two science packets for my text book, som vocab (a lot actually), a folder project to complete, and an essay to rewrite. Its all due tomorrow. God, tonight is going to suck.
KMC Community Forums
Apr 6th, 2008 07:35 PM
It happened again.
thank **** for that 
It's okay, Arachnid.
