Gender: Male Location: 1/9.7'rd Horseman of the Apocalypse
Lol, who knew that makign Link vs threads hich COME UP ON GOOGLE more often would attract more supporters of that character?
also, yeah, a couple are people I introduced to this site just to show the threads to that ended up joining because they felt liek they needed to prove someone wrong, see Lootic/Voyeur.
That said, wtf how coudl we POSSIBLY be socks, we're all different.
CC makes longer posts than the rest of us, that cover different points than we make, Voyeur spams and thinks Link is a homosexual, Lootic is Swedish and therefore a viking, Xan is humble and polite.. it goes on like that.
__________________
The moon and stars aren't just shades of lead
But you wouldn't know as you rest your head.
Last edited by ScreamPaste on Mar 13th, 2009 at 04:55 AM
I didn't mock him. I simply stated that he is an extremely overrated character and that if anyone tried to deny that, then they'd have to be delusional.
In any case, I still haven't seen anyone put up information on Sephiroth so we can get this debate really under way. Would someone please bring up something so that we have a grounds for feats to compare?
__________________ -"My internet is currently so bad I'm time traveling. Don't worry about it."
-"You have the best problems, Scenario. You really do. haermm"
Why, because there's no evidence that any of the so-called socks actually are, and I've told people to stop spamming threads with comments about it? Or because I've told people to drop it when they've continued to bring it up after I've said to stop?
I guess you've never heard of 'innocent until proven guilty'.
I have to say that I do just vote in the thread and then watch, my debating skills are very sub par, and even with a large vocabulary I have a lot of trouble typing out what it is that I want to say.
Gender: Unspecified Location: Where the Sheikah Things Are
TAKE THIS FROM A GUY NAMED VOYEUR
Voyeur: noun-
A person who derives sexual gratification from observing the naked bodies or sexual acts of others, especially from a secret vantage point.
(aka Voyeurism; e.g. looking up a girl's skirt)
What Link has on is a Tunic. Or in any case a very long shirt with a belt over his waist. Where specifically a skirt is related to a smaller, single article of clothing that starts at the waist and ends any where at Knee level or higher. A dress can start at shoulder blade height and reach down pass the knees and then some.
The most feminine article of clothing you could relate the Tunic Link wears too is perhaps a very over sized blouse, but that isn't the case. Link isn't a transvestite and besides you're going out of your way to make Link seem inferior by such feeble attempts. The very fact in your eyes he even wears something that is girly and is still able to kick Sephiroth's ass should say something more about Sephiroth's own masculinity.
Last edited by Voyeur on Mar 13th, 2009 at 05:05 AM
Fasc went on an entire crusade about it the other day. I've run everyone through the sock checker as well as checking their actual IPs. Everything checks out clean.
Suspicions are not enough to get anyone banned. We don't ban for socking without proof, of which there is none. It's really very simple, and I'm getting tired of repeating that.
Gender: Unspecified Location: Where the Sheikah Things Are
Is calling us out on something so meaningless as to accuse us of being "socks" the only way you can dream to hope to bring any sort of win to your side of the debate? Really kind of pathetic.
Even if there was some alternate dimension where we were socks, we all seem to bring up very different points, type differently with multiple mannerisms and have other view points from the next.
So how about you drop this effortless attempt at what ever it is and set aside fan boy failure and let the facts, feats and more speak for themselves. We have the math, science, facts and proof behind what Link can do. What can Sephiroth do besides get beat by *smirk* Sora and Cloud?
KMC Community Forums
Mar 13th, 2009 04:40 AM
