These guys are both pretty damn strong. Cena's FU on Big Show, Viscera and the double FU, pretty impressive. And Batista in 2005-early 2006 ruled Smackdown will an iron fist, just want to see who you guys think is stronger.
__________________ 'Say Hello to the Bad Guy'- Razor Ramon
i'd go with cena for the examples above. i've never seen batista lift someone like big show over his shoulders. i've also seen him struggle batista bombing some of the slightly heavier opponents like kane.
I say they're both pretty "meh" wrestlers. Both are pretty awful on the mic as well but God bless Cena for trying.
To answer your question though, in turns of feats, I'd have to say Cena. I could understand why someone would choose Batista though. His physique looks pretty impressive.
IMO if Batista used the FU move to Big Show, he could also do it.
The Batista Bomb is a move which you can only perform on smaller, lighter opponents.
Lifting the opponent from the shoulders is a lot easier than spinning them around in a powerbomb position.
__________________
"Farewell, Damos... Ash, Pikachu... And you. All of my beloved." -- Arceus
Pretty much every wrestling fan knows that. Doesn't mean it isn't entertaining to watch anyway. It's like any other TV show, really. So what if the winner is predecided? We as the audience don't know who's going to win until the end of the fight.
Also, Batista. But Cena is generally the more favoured one.
i didnt say it wasnt. i just said that during a match theres a lot of 'ad lib' and that generally only the end is scripted as to how someone wins. of course its fake, the only people more idiotic than people who think wrestling is real are those that believe that most fans of wrestling think its real.
Dave beating Shawn Michaels was by far one of the worst moments in WWE
and i think Cena's stronger. Dave's a body builder so they pay more attention to the muscle sculpting as opposed to strength building. but i could be wrong though.
KMC Community Forums
Mar 15th, 2009 06:07 PM
