Well who is? Aside Spiderman of course? I dont even think the X Men are in the same league as Supes or Batman. Both did soo much for comics as a whole, not just DC. The only Marvel character that can even come close is Spiderman.
That's probably just what hype wants you to think about it..
Like what they did with Hulk? I dunno... Then again, I liked the first Hulk movie a lot better than the 2008 one. Tim Roth kinda ruined the latter for me, in a way. He's just not really that good an actor IMO, though at least he didn't have anything to do with the Abomination's horrible one-liners, but the part where Hulk kicked him into a tree was still probably the best part of the movie.
It was alot more exciting in my eyes. The first one didnt really satisfy me in the action department. I know its a really shallow view, but its just my opinion.
You know, when I first saw Batman Forever, I thought it was really good. It also seemed more my audience since I was a little kid when I watched it, and the first two were more adult.
And looking back, it's still an okay film, and even though it's not as good as the other two, it's still a good film.
It's like T3, not as good as the first two at all, but still an okay film, so there's no doubt in my mind Nolan's third Batman film will "suck".
At least the latter of the two didn't have nothing but horrible one-liners.
I think that was the general idea. Kinda added onto the drama of the movie so to speak.
Oh, you evil pessimist you. Ironically though, this was a quote from Nolan himself regarding the 3rd movie:
"Well ... let me think how to put this. There are two things to be said. One is the emphasis on story. What’s the story? Is there a story that’s going to keep me emotionally invested for the couple of years that it will take to make another one? That’s the overriding question. On a more superficial level, I have to ask the question: How many good third movies in a franchise can people name? [Laughs.] At the same time, in taking on the second one, we had the challenge of trying to make a great second movie, and there haven't been too many of those either. It’s all about the story really. If the story is there, everything is possible. I hope that was a suitably slippery answer."
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one. Although it can be said that 2008 only happened because the other one was so god-awful they had to erase it
Back to Batman 3
if Nolan and the rest of the people involved return, and they take their time like 3 years or more and produce a good script and characters then it won't suck (i hope)
That is the problem with Hollywood they want to make money so quickly and punch crap out even quicker (transformers 2)