Choose your words more carefully... he never not once proved to be absolutely immune to the IG. False statement. He proved to be immune to ONE shot... there is ZERO proof he could've taken every shot the IG would fire at him. Furthermore, it was stated on panel by Maelstrom that his power was not on the IG's level.
^ I'll choose my words more carefully when I'm not dealing with someone whose logic isn't "Who cares if something can destroys a multiverse or a universe, that doesn't mean anything in terms of power." And I'm not going to argue the nuances of plain presentation with you either. A.Maelstrom utterly no-sold IG-Thanos' blast. That's all there is to it.
Furthermore, it was stated on-panel by Maelstrom that the IG "may well surpass the power of the Quantum Bands." This point has been brought up before by those who would butcher plain English: Read that scan more closely.
You never proved it did just speculated it did. Handbook says it didn't so you got nothing.
Handbook.
The comic also states differently than the bio unlike the abraxas bio. Tanking one shot also doesn't mean you are completely immune to the ig and even if it did that doesn't mean he's more powerful just immune. Do you ever think about what you post before you post?
^ I have Multi-Eternity being destroyed on-panel by the UN. The Multi-Eternity that was introduced on-panel in the same story. The literal personification of all the alternate universes that were getting distorted and melded into a mess on-panel. The UN which Reed literally states can destroy the Multiverse on-panel. How you go from this: to this: You have no shame. It is truly something to behold. The handbooks you love also state that A.Maelstrom > IG-Thanos and that THOTU absorbed a universe. You love handbooks.
The comic basically portrayed plainly, that IG-Thanos was completely impotent when faced with A.Maelstrom. His power was ineffective. His prescience was ineffective. And that's basically confirmed by the handbook. Do you ever think that your own self-serving logic has completely gutted every argument you've ever made? And that upon recognition of that, the only thing you can do now is argue, "Well I know I conceded you proved your argument before, but I change my mind based on my uncontrollable butt-hurt."
Control yourself. Don't let the butt-hurt control you.
^ It's not speculation that Multi-Eternity was destroyed on-panel by the UN. It's not speculation that Multi-Eternity was introduced on-panel in the same story. It's not speculation that all the alternate universes were getting distorted and melded into a mess on-panel. it's not speculation that Reed literally states the UN can destroy the Multiverse on-panel. And it certainly isn't speculation that all Abraxas' past actions were not erased.
You don't even have a position. You're just insisting that somehow, someway, your arguments aren't gutted. You're not fooling anybody. Especially not when you changed your mind three times, on the same issue, looking at the same evidence.
You're the one that disagrees. You hate that the comic plainly portrays that A.Maelstrom is immune to the IG's power and prescience. You hate that the bio confirms the same. But you love bios. And I already posted the scan that you've misrepresented in the past as if A.Maelstrom admits that IG-Thanos is superior. He compared the Quantum Bands and the Infinity Gems. English. English motherf@cker, do you speak it?
By your reliance on handbooks > on-panel evidence, then Thanos doesn't have matter manipulation. A.Maelstrom > IG-Thanos. And THOTU absorbed a universe. You can live in your deluded world. I'll take on-panel evidence > handbooks anyday. You're an idiot or a troll. This is English. A.Maelstrom didn't say IG-Thanos was superior. He said the Infinity Gems were superior to the Quantum Bands. Read the panel and then pick whether you're an idiot or a troll:
^ Oh... so those are all errors contradicted by on-panel evidence? Nope. Those are all true. Since the on-panel evidence actually supports it (save for Thanos not having matter manipulation). You love handbooks. Reed nullified/recreated the Marvel Multiverse. Get over it. After all, you already did... twice.
Alternate universe Reed's gun pwned Living Tribunal. You love handbooks.
And you're again wrong, since A.Maelstrom had his own kinetic powers, was empowered by Oblivion and had usurped Anomaly's powers. The Quantum Bands weren't his only power source. Compounding more wrong on top of your original wrong? Good job not comprehending English. But I guess you love being wrong as much as your handbooks.
Show me one comic scan that states reed recreated the multiverse. Do it otherwise I accept your surrender.
He wasn't Oblivion's avatar at this point in the arc that happened in the end and at this point his bread and butter was the quantum bands which he compared to the ig.
Ig>>>>>>quantum bands. You don't need to be an adept user anyway to beat a quantum band wielder. This is th ekind o flogic you support.
^ Already showed you the on-panel blowing up of Multi-Eternity. However you want to deal with it this time around, is ultimately your choice. And since you choose to change your mind three times over, you're choosing to be an idiot or a troll. Pick whichever describes you best.
Yes. He was empowered by Oblivion at that point. AND he became Anomaly. AND he had his own kinetic powers. Reread Cosmos in Collision. I'm not even going to rub this in. You're just mistaken.
No sh1t, sherlock. And that's all that Maelstrom states and that's all the comic states. it's also portrayed that A.Maelstrom no-sold IG-Thanos' blast and operates outside his prescience. try to keep up.
No, you didn't show him recreating the multiverse and the bio clearly states universe so it's speculation unless you can show me definitive proof otherwise.
He wasn't Oblivion's avatar yet you claim this version is more powerful than the ig?
Please say you are serious.
Surviving a blast unaffected doesn't equal immunity. I mean this is the worst logic out there.
The Multiverse being recreated happens in the next panel. It's called: an "illustration."
I'm not talking about Oblivion recreating him. I'm talking about before A.Maelstrom was killed by his own black hole. And the claim is displayed on-panel plainly and confirmed via the handbooks you love so much. So why have a problem with it? Please say you're an idiot.
Yeah... like manipulating a marble-sized sphere doesn't equal superior power. When are you going to remember that all these debates you think you're having only serve to undercut your own idiotic rationale?
Do you really think I care about getting you to outright admit you're incorrect? You've done that twice here already. What possible meaning would a third admission be when you pull quanchiwaffles? The only thing I've done, and continue to do, is use your own backwards logic against you. This only serves to corner you into even further untenable positions. And eventually you make an idiotic argument like "marble-sized sphere = Multiverse-wide blast" or "handbooks override on-panel evidence." And without realizing it, you start tearing your own arguments apart.
^ The bio stated A.Maelstrom > IG-Thanos and all you have is speculation that he wasn't immune while we have proof he was.
The comic directly supported this whereas they supported everything else in my case.
So should you keep deflecting from the fact that you literally just raped your own arguments? Again? I'd tell you to stop, but you apparently enjoy it. Moreover, you're pretty damn good at it.
KMC Community Forums
Jul 8th, 2010 03:25 PM
