I'm a big fan, but to be honest, Peter Parker just isn't in the same league as Doom, Richards, Stark, Pym, Banner and so on.
He has his moments of genius, but that's about it.
__________________ The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
Reed is significantly smarter in regards to pure scientific ability.
But Tony has beat him in multi-dimensional chess, so I'd put him as the better strategist, with a superior ability to apply his genius to real world scenarios.
Gender: Male Location: Stuck In the future where Akus evil
ya know i laughed pretty hard about you saying this because it looks like the guy in your sig(btw is that Neil Patrick Harris? looks like him)was gonna say that...
Reed has said that Tony is the better tactian and multitasker... Which is why Tony beat reed while play three games of chess and running his iron man exteemis suit...
Also Tony hacked c.l.o.c. Which reed designed and said he was able to do it because reed has always been poor when it came to software...
I Liken reed to those kinds of geniuses. That can only arrive attheir great techno marvels if left alone... While Tony recreates or creates iron man tech on the fly in the field of battle... Ie orignal iron man... Durin civil war... Etc
__________________ Quotes from Hia8:
"I claimed that the science is sometimes faulty."
"You don't understand. This is fiction. That means none of this stuff really happened."
"There is no writer to purposely ignore a character's natural ability just because it suits the story."
"in some cases because the writer knows that Character A will dominate Character B easily and refuses to allow this to happen for the sake of the story."