I know that a lot of comic book characters have high-end and low-end showings, which sometimes makes it difficult to determine their measure. This is my attempt to mediate that somewhat.
Iron Man and Captain America face off in Central Park. Only their high-end feats are allowed for consideration, meaning they're both going in at their best. Who wins?
__________________ -"My internet is currently so bad I'm time traveling. Don't worry about it."
-"You have the best problems, Scenario. You really do. haermm"
Iron Man. Honestly, Steve shouldn't have a chance in hell if Tony wants to kill or even just beat him in a fight. Not without some kind of prep or plot device.
Not really "bad", no, but Cap is seriously disadvantaged here. He knows Tony though and his shield will help him defend against his attacks, but in the end Iron Man should win nearly every single time.
If it was cap with only high end showings and irons mans first suit or something maybe..( the one that couldn't fly) but otherwise iron man had way too many options. Sonics. Ground and pound. Area blasts.
__________________ Quotes from Hia8:
"I claimed that the science is sometimes faulty."
"You don't understand. This is fiction. That means none of this stuff really happened."
"There is no writer to purposely ignore a character's natural ability just because it suits the story."
"in some cases because the writer knows that Character A will dominate Character B easily and refuses to allow this to happen for the sake of the story."
Someone who can fly at many times the speed of sound, has missiles, sonics, eletro-weaponry, can multi target, has lasers and can lift 100tons +, against a human man who punches things.
KMC Community Forums
Jun 19th, 2010 05:30 AM
