I agree with that ^. Of all the Marvel Superheroes Thor and Warlock are the only beings under Skyfather that have a real shot of beating Thanos.
I believe Thanos is stronger than Thor but not by that much but still it's advantage though. Thor and Thanos are pretty much equals in energy output, durability they both can take some serious damage, intelligence is not even close Thanos is Richards 10x, thanos has the advantage by via Death with his upgrades has surpass Thor. If Marvel can tap into Thor bloodline of Gaea maybe given him more abilites like geomorph, biosphere energy like Tyrants then that would put Thor in Thanos class, just my imo of course.
Thanos wins the majority but he will have to earn it everytime, Thanos as bad as he is even he can not stand up too numerious planet busting blows from the hammer even Thanos has his limits.
Sure but Thanos isnt Odins equal and he sure as hell isnt close to it. Just because Thanos took a physical beating from Odin doesnt make him his equal, especially since he couldnt cause any kind of physical harm or a scratch on Odin.
Agreed and the worst part is most of them are so against the thanos fanboys on this site. Thor is not beating thanos I do not think thanos stomps but I also do not believe Thor can take any wins. Thanos has to fight for the wins but he is far far to durable smart and powerful to lose to Thor..
Thor fighting to his best can't be hit by Thanos. Any blasts thrown at him will be absorbed and sent back at Thanos 10 fold. IMO Thanos can't take one of his blasts that is 10 fold in power. Plus Thor's hammer strikes will rock the hell out of Thanos.
Find it odd that you have scans for everything else, BUT this. Unless you're talking about amped Thor, amped Thanos clone. Because well then, seriously?
Right, like I've said, did seemingly nothing to Thanos, at all.
You're not being clear, and you're arguing about a non point. I don't think you have any reason to question people's comprehension.
I just thought you'd be better than arguing about the belt of strength for no reason, when you outright admitted Thor's durability was still amped. lulz
The armor as a whole was fused with the Odin Force, not just the shield. He was still amped after the shield broke, etc. Either way, still not Thor's durability.
I'm rambling on? Hilarious coming from a guy who's arguing about a small detail when admitting Thor was still amped...
Hilarious coming from a guy who's arguing against me about Thanos' status in IG, when I made a small blurp about it.
It is a big deal though. Spider-Man almost drops Thanos with the IG with a kick after webbing his eyes. This shit sound normal to you?
I adressed that. Cyclops shouldn't have had Thanos putting so much power into his forward movement that he stumbles when he cuts it off. It would be like some blowing on you and then stopping. You're not going to stumble forward, so why should Thanos (the guy who can swat Surfer's blasts with a hand)?
Hell, Cyke also had Thanos block his blast too... something I just noticed.
Still, like I said, something that shouldn't happen. Same with Cloak putting Thanos in his cloak as well...
And you're trying to uplay Thanos in that series to make Thor's feat even more impressive, fancy that, eh?
Thor 'knocks out' Thanos one time (that could be construed as him toying with them anyway), and he does what Hulk did the other time. Neither should happen. All I've been saying is that the comic felt odd for someone who is supposed to be Thanos plus, if Thanos wasn't toying around.
Then there's where I call PIS multiple times that you've ignored, so whatever I guess.
All of them had Thanos getting smashed around when he shouldn't have. Also, speaking of unharmed, none of the attacks actually left Thanos harmed. Not Wolverine, not Thor, not Hulk, etc. However, the moment they happened, we can see effects. Thor, Wolverine, and even when Hulk is beating on him when he's doing nothing. It was borderline retarded.
I do understand though. But by you initiating an argument with me over it, I start to think you actually believe this is a viable example... and with your history of Thor/Thanos, you know...
I never said he took it easy, I just said he wasn't KO'ed.
Also, how do you expect him to be after a seemingly faster than light hammer throw? Stiff as a board? Of course he's going to be folded up.
I realize what you're attacking, but in the end, you're using scans from IG that go against absolutely everything to counter something that goes against none of the Thanos/Thor battles, besides that one.
In the end, you're still defending Thor no matter what happens. Two shotted, three shotted, 10 shotted, it doesn't matter. Thor still went on his knees helpless at the time. Bringing up something like you brought up really makes it hard for you to "well, I only brought it up because they brought up this!!!".
Counter idiotic statements with idiotic proof solves nothing.
Also, you're still arguing with me on this detail, and you're acting annoyed, so I figure you have some sort of belief in it.
Then don't low ball him when I make a small quip about it, simple really. Otherwise people start believing your low balling.
You have to not take how fights occur in comics too seriously. The outcome of these fights are for the sake of the plot and not what will really happen in REAL life or a forum fight for that matter. That is one of the reasons ABC logic often fails. Fights are generally like Rock Paper Scissors. That is the beauty of debate and analysis. We must not be lazy and try to figure out how the fight will go down if both characters are fighting to their best.
Thor fighting to his best can't be hit by Thanos. Any blasts thrown at him will be absorbed and sent back at Thanos 10 fold. IMO Thanos can't take one of his blasts that is 10 fold in power. Plus Thor's hammer strikes will rock the hell out of Thanos.
If you disagree then point out a strategy that Thanos would employ to net him the win.
KMC Community Forums
Jul 13th, 2010 03:28 PM
