No I just don't see every time you wish to discuss a certain character's attributes and clarify them that we need make a completely new thread for them, when there is already a thread that could be used for that.
I mean its not like you're making a million mile march to a far away place. It's a few clicks away and anybody reading this and is interested enough to be in the discussion would know where to go as well.
And just to sum up the answer for you. There is no better place to discuss a character story/abilities/anything else you want to talk about said character then in a thread already designed for the discussion of said character.
When there are two separate boards, for two specific purposes - discussing comics and discussing comic fights, with the speed discussion clearly belonging in the latter then yes, there is a 'better place' - the one designed specifically for this type of discussions.
This is a special case, the Thor/Surfer speed discussion is a reccurent one in the forum - so I think having two threads, out of thousands (in many of which this point was debated), specifically designed to discuss this, isn't really inappropriate. Or is it taking too much space from your screen? Tell us, so we can make you more comfortable.
This is an useless exchange. And my last post on this. I'm waiting for Raoul or Bada to come in, so that we can proceed.
__________________
“Perhaps this is the ultimate freedom. The freedom to leave.”
Last edited by Philosophía on Apr 8th, 2011 at 02:08 PM
Guys, I didn't make any rulings. I went through the thread and addressed the issues I saw and added a few of my own. I just wanted to keep the topic going.
Once again I would think debating anything about a character would be under the idea of Character Discussion.
If you're talking a fight then why not just go ahead and prove it in a thread where the character is already fighting.
Isn't that what you're supposed to do.
As for this being a special case there will always be special cases. Someone will always want a ruling on a particular character. And these special cases will always be open for continued debate since characters are always changing.
So why not go ahead and use the mediums that are already presented to you which should more than give you plenty of room to get any arguments you want out or in as the case is.
And on a more personal level I feel that general this idea going to fail because you're trying to rule on specific characters instead on things that matter.
For instance the way debates are held, the way things are understood. That is important than trying to make a forum wide ruling saying Character X is not fast enough to do anything to character Y since character X isn't just going to stay standard forever to what we could rule at that given moment.
I would say the same thing for anyone trying to debate Superman's strength or Hulk's strength or Juggernaut's durability.
On a personal note Bada I think this entire thread is doomed to failure because you're trying to make forum wide judgments on characters which will never hold.
If you want to make any real headway in this I think the idea should be more centered on defining the character vs forum.
also, is the purpose of Vs forum to determine how WE think characters would perform or how WE THINK COMICS would depict characters?
ie...take flash vs thor as an example:
if we go by how WE think they would perform, perhaps a strong argument can be made that Flash wins majority quite clearly.
if we go by how WE THINK COMICS would depict a fight between the two, taking everything into consideration, it would be a much closer fight, with thor perhaps winning.
I think knowing how we frame the purpose of these threads can also help on ruling how to discuss characters
that becomes almost entirely a debate of powersets then...and characterizations that have taken decades to build up become essentially null & void in debates
also, I would like to note that the term 'PIS' is being abused and misused way too often
these days, anything ppl don't like, it's labeled as PIS.
Existere's got a point here. It's a slippery slope, imo. We already have had plenty of fights devolve into powersets vs. powersets to the point where character and personality don't factor into the equation. It then becomes PIS if said character doesn't use everything at their disposal when said character really doesn't use everything at their disposal to begin with for the norm. Blaming it on the writers and plot and the "need for the story to be interesting" can be flimsy because we know creative writers out there can write stories fully or damn near close to fully exploring the entirety of a power set.
It's pretty tricky either way, because you're either going to have a character fighting out of character based off of something which isn't the norm nor should it be treated as such or you're basically interpreting the character to further your own agenda/argument over how the comics do, for good or for ill.
Well given that that's EXACTLY as it is right now ("regular" forms unless true form is specifically specified), i'm curious exactly what it is you want to be put in the rules.
We already did. It's under the CIP ruling in the Rules section.
No they're not.
We already treat personality and behaviour as the primary (or at least one of) decider on how a character will perform. Again, this is in the CIP ruling.
Gender: Male Location: Hiding from The Doctor, shhhh.....
After Batman's xanatos roulette to escape Darkseid's last **** you via the Omega Sanction, nobody can say shit about his prep skills.
Kandy: That Darkseid was responsible for the space/time collapse and the death of the multiverse under his own power. The ALE let him hang on while he was dying, and the reshaping is also due to it. But the fist crushing and choking the life out of the DCU? That's all him. Hell, Orion put the hole in his heart that sent him back in time, he deserves alot of credit too.
__________________ Wanted: New sig. Something crazy, zany, and slightly evil. Will give sig credit to whoever's I sport.