Yea, it's not as if Hercules/Thor struck each other with enough force to close a hole in space/time. Whatever, it's fine, I posted other feats more impressive than destroying a planet.
I don't want this to become a debate. Match the feats posted or concede.
__________________
Last edited by Rage.Of.Olympus on Jun 19th, 2011 at 01:48 AM
I'm surprised it hasn't been proven that Gladiator is noticeably above Thor physically yet. With such dedicated fans I'd have assumed they had access to some really amazing feats that only they are privy to.
I mean, it's not as if we've seen Gladiator's best and have yet to bare witness to some of Thor's higher end showings or anything.....
Ok, still the Glads Skyscraper seems more impressive.
Asgard is huge, so is the ship Glads is flying to Big G, the one full of weapons.
I don't want it to become a debate too. Just pointing out some differences. The Midgard serpent is the most impressive thor feat yet and I think it's on par with Glads Planet buster.
No need to concede.
BTW I'm not a Glads fan . I just hoped Carver would feel inspired and post some scans I don't know. And I hoped to see some Thor scans which show him to be over > Glads. Still waiting.
I'm off sleeping ^^. Maybe you will surprise me when I'm back .
__________________
Sig made by my mate, the one and only One_Angry_Scot
I'm not sure you realize what I was trying to do. I attempted to continuously bump up the scale.
You posted Gladiator lifting a Skyscraper and I posted Thor lifting the much larger Asgard.
You posted Gladiator moving the large ship -of unknown size I might add- and I posted Thor lifting the much larger Midgard Serpent.
I tried to keep at least 2 different categories for some order. Those being Striking and Lifting.
You have yet to post a lifting feat to match Thor supporting the weight of half a planet. You have yet to post a striking feat as impressive as rocking Surtur. But I digress, you don't have to adhere to those guidelines.
Ok, so you should bump the scale. I posted the Skyscraper, you posted a, in my opinion, lesser skyscraper feat. You posted the larger Asgard feat but Thor wasn't alone. Except of this, while Glads lifted something from the ground, your scans show more something like supporting.
The midgard Serpent was really nice. The spaceship was big, as big as a city with million tons of weapon on board.^^
Sorry maybe I missed something but when did Thor supported half a planet?
As for the stryking. We talk about strength I though. So the strike should be done without Mjolnir. A Hammerthrow or an Hammer strike is surely more powerful then an normal punch from Thor, so we can't take them into account, don't you think?
__________________
Sig made by my mate, the one and only One_Angry_Scot
Gender: Male Location: Planning to take over the WORLD!
it's glads' time to shine! so, where's all the magic?? i notice some are rather conspicuous by their absence. that seems to say an awful lot more than the scans do...... i trust we can put to bed this nonsense that glads' is stronger than thor. i mean even his biggest supporters are unwilling to try and show different. and i thought for sure we'd see something from a fully confident gladiator! i mean he's talked about all the time, so he must have made an appearance SOMEWHERE......
Apart from the Midgard Serpent none of those Thor strength feats were particularly impressive by High Herald standards.
That being said the decided lack of Gladiator nuthuggers here is delicious. I expected to see no less than three posters post the vaunted "planet destruction" feat.
Pretty sure we can just go ahead and declare Thor the winner if this is all Glad's corner can come up with.
__________________
“Where the longleaf pines are whispering
to him who loved them so.
Where the faint murmurs now dwindling
echo o’er tide and shore."
-A Grave Epitaph in Santa Rosa County, Florida; I wish I could remember the man's name.
Last edited by Omega Vision on Jun 19th, 2011 at 05:31 PM
I thought the Skyscraper feat was sufficient enough to match Gladiator's but as I wasn't 100% certain, hence I posted the Asgard feat which is noticeably more superior.
There isn't anything to debate about. Lifting a Skyscraper is nowhere near as impressive as lifting Asgard with someone who is your physical peer. Cut the weight in half and it's still a city compared to a building. Re-read the scene. Asgard dropped on them.
I'm not really sure what you want. The feats I posted are superior. Continuously discussing moving a spaceship of unknown size is nowhere near as impressive as the Midgard Serpent feat. It may match lifting Asgard but that's about it.
If you can't match the feats posted then move on. Discussing them as if that somehow makes them less impressive doesn't actually prove anything as it's all right there in the pages.
Thor wins. Let's drop it and move on. I don't want this to become a debate because you have the inability to admit when your lacking support.
You'd call it hyperbole most likely.
You don't want to take Mjolnir into account? A certain "individual" thinks even with Mjolnir, Thor has never done anything nearly as impressive as destroying a planet and the OP said physical power. It is an inherently difficult task as Thor uses Mjolnir often but at least we've established at one point Gladiator can't match Thor. Anyways, closing that dimensional barrier should be sufficient enough to equal planet destroying if nothing else.
How about showings of might against other established entities? Thor owning Drax, overpowering and knocking out Surfer, overpowering Annihilus, stalemating Kurse, kicking Mephisto's ass and things of that nature? All more impressive than anything Gladiator has done in my book.
In your mind, does it start at planetary level force? If so, the Midgard Serpent feat isn't the only showing on or above that level posted thus far. Of course I'm assuming you didn't go throw the entire thread.
__________________
Last edited by Rage.Of.Olympus on Jun 19th, 2011 at 07:15 PM
KMC Community Forums
Jun 18th, 2011 09:08 PM
