Juggernaut is more durable (non disputable) then comes adamantium then Thor's hammer.
My reasoning of why adamantium is stronger than Mjolnir is because we have seen plenty of times where the hammer broke, got cracked, or split in half, by forces adamantium should be able to take. Second, King Thor denting the shield with a less durable object is logical since the area of the strike was smaller the area of the shield and the thickness of the hammer was much larger than the thickness of the shield. If the roles were reversed then easily Thor with an adamantium hammer (like Hercules's mace) could dent a thin uru shield.
Correct. It may be possible that adamantium is stronger than Cap's shield. But King Thor did warp Wolverine's skeleton. But CA's shield simply got broke into pieces. So adamantium wins there.
When Thor faced off against perikus...who is supposedly Thor level... The guy cut thors hammer in half... That's some feat!
Using tech the skrulls took beta ray bills hammer and cut it in half.
__________________ Quotes from Hia8:
"I claimed that the science is sometimes faulty."
"You don't understand. This is fiction. That means none of this stuff really happened."
"There is no writer to purposely ignore a character's natural ability just because it suits the story."
"in some cases because the writer knows that Character A will dominate Character B easily and refuses to allow this to happen for the sake of the story."
Cap did have one made of adamantium before... I believe he said the balance felt off...
I think protocide and John walker as us agent wielded adamantium ones too.
__________________ Quotes from Hia8:
"I claimed that the science is sometimes faulty."
"You don't understand. This is fiction. That means none of this stuff really happened."
"There is no writer to purposely ignore a character's natural ability just because it suits the story."
"in some cases because the writer knows that Character A will dominate Character B easily and refuses to allow this to happen for the sake of the story."