Perhaps you view the internet differently than I do. I have no comment on your statement, but I will say this: free speech is always a good thing. And by the way... people can not change. Any historian and/or history buff will tell you, that despite advances in technology, man remains the same - there has been no increase in wisdom, just knowledge. The world is a dangerous place; in fact, some would argue, much more dangerous. All these advances in technology, but no increase in wisdom. Humans remain human (at their core). Understand?
I don't know anyone who would disagree with you. People fundamentally just want to work and take care of their families - and if they have the money, to take a vacation from time to time. People just want to be left alone to live their lives, but megalomaniacs don't care about that.
Last edited by ushomefree on Jan 19th, 2012 at 02:46 AM
Gender: Male Location: Southern Oregon,
Looking at you.
I still find it strange that you believe in freedom of speech. Maybe this is the wrong forum, but isn't freedom of speech inconsistent with Christianity? I know that when I was a Christian, we did not believe in freedom of speech, unless you were talking about religous speech.
Gender: Male Location: Southern Oregon,
Looking at you.
I'm sorry, but that would be inappropriate. I would be happy to tell you my life's story, but this is nether the place nor time. Please let us stay on the topic.
I will agree, we did not come from the same Christian denomination.
Well maybe you can send me a PM, and I'll reciprocate.
Anyhoo.
Regardless of whatever Christian denomination(s) that you and your church practiced, all denominations hold core tenants of Christianity, and why freedom of speech would become an issue blows my mind.
Regarding freedom of religion in the "Christian" church, we are taught to preach the Word and saving grace of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. We are all sinners and need redemption. If people wish not to listen, let it be.
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
I am not sure if you are right though. Especially Google and Wikipedia protest not for piracy, but against the overreaching powers the government will give itself. Of course everyone that is pro-piracy, is probably against the bill, but I wouldn't say a majority, nor that it is the main focus.
And that is a funny coincidence, as long as the important topics are discussed though, that's pretty good.
yeah but the problem is most of them are bought off and paid for and dont believe in the constitution.so she is right,kick them all out since they are not here to serve us and dont believe in the constitution or the bill of rights.
some of them want to keep their heads buried in the sand and dont want to wake up as you can tell from the replys to this post of yours.well said.
Man I never thought any president could be worse than Bushwacker was but man I was wrong, Obozo is. He has spat on the constituition and the bill of rights worse than Bush ever did.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Feb 13th, 2012 at 06:17 PM