So not only do you make him post first, having you have the advantage of posting after him, you want to force him to not be able to post last, therefore nulling any advantage that he might have in having one last post?
Its a little more involved. We agreed to have 8-10 posts each. He asked if he could have a few more in case 10 is not enough. And I agreed.
I held my bargain. He can have on or two extra posts. But I am not letting him get away with weaseling into having 10 posts, on top reserving the right counter off my replies.
Thats a cheap tactic.
Quanchi when you post your closing statement. I will reply with my own. Until then, I will not feed you anymore replies since you've reach your post limit.
I was practically on the verge of begging him to counter I gave him an entire week while I agreed to stop posting by 2 pm's to him. He can post to whatever he wants I just meant when we agree to summations that's when the debate ends save one closing argument. It's like a courtroom when you can question a witness. I also put up one last post with one last point of difference so he can respond to anything I think it's shotty and horrible debating to save new material at the end of the debate because no one can respond at that point. I will post my summation before he does.
My argument is done you can respond to my last post I won't counter. My points have been made as have yours (I think) and anything more will be rehashing our arguments.
I will post my summation and when yours follows the battlezone is effectively done and over with.
The hammer has almost struck you sans my avie. It strikes soon.
KMC Community Forums
Mar 13th, 2012 05:20 AM
