Registered: Jul 2010
Location: 4th Street Underpass, Manhattan
I knew I wasn't the only one who was thinking that he was acting unreasonably butthurt.
But enough about Focus's silliness. That article was an excellent read. I wish they would just have Niel DeGrasse Tyson re-reading that over and over again in place of 1 hour of the idiocy that is 106 and Park.
please keep your personal grudges in the versus forum, thanks.
unless you plan on throwing another "fried chicken" rant and embarrassing yourself and everyone else reading.
__________________ "Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage."
Haha, so everyone now is a wingman? Also, please stop using my insults to you back at us. You've already been called out for embarrassing yourself(you're still doing it), so no need for projection, captain insecurity.
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Captain's Chair, CA
IMO, helping to pull people out of a wreck probably doesn't make up for stalking and killing someone. But It's a start, maybe he can go on tour and pull some more people out of wrecks; it can be his thing.
That's an excellent point...That is is if George Zimmerman stalked and killed someone. Don't you hate it when facts (or in your case, lack thereof) get in the way of emotions?
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Miami Metropolitan Area
That Zimmerman killed Martin was never up for dispute. That he followed (you could get into a semantic debate about 'follow' vs. 'stalk', but I wouldn't bother if I were you because I couldn't care less about how you define 'stalk') Martin is also not up for debate.
__________________
“Where the longleaf pines are whispering
to him who loved them so.
Where the faint murmurs now dwindling
echo o’er tide and shore."
-A Grave Epitaph in Santa Rosa County, Florida; I wish I could remember the man's name.
So what you're basically saying is, based on your own opinions it's not open for debate. That's pretty self explanatory don't you think? And stalk vs. follow isn't a semantical difference, there's a fine line between stalk and follow. So in response to your logic, I couldn't care less what your opinion is on the matter and because you made a redundant point, so will I.
Ah Rob, unable to read as usual. Notice how I didn't say "kill OR stalk". Notice how I DID say "kill AND stalk", as in the whole act. But again, don't let facts confuse you.
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Captain's Chair, CA
July 17th.
Many of the articles say "Saved" and "Rescued", though there was some other man there helping people out of the overturned car and no injuries were reported.
Rescued would be more appropriate than "saved", in that case. But "helped" seems more apt.
Anyway, that's good that he has not become jaded due to the obvious blunder he made last year. From what other people said about Zimmerman, he was a helpful person.
No, you have to kill before and then get acquitted and then help "save" someone. Which means....
Jul 23rd, 2013 05:00 PM
it truly is needless.
