Back to your No Limit Fallacy with AV that it can kill anything, no matter what. You're swinging from Voldermort's nuts and trying to force a win like you always do cos he's your favorite.
Repeat: Give me an example of Imhotep being harmed(AV harms/kills, it's not a spell designed to strip an immortal of his immortality) by magic? Give me one example of immortal-version Imhotep being killed.
Nope. You have yet to show how he could win against an immortal Imhotep.
Just because it kills Imhotep that doesn't mean it kills anyone. I debate based on abilities, facts, and common sense. You debate based on personal feelings.
Imhotep hasn't shown himself immune to any magic. Imhotep is only immune to mortal weaponry. It says so in the movie.
Ooooor. Imhotep uses his enhanced speed/reflexes to not get hit by those spells that were slow enough that Harry could dodge them, plus his superior TK to blast Voldemort into the water, where he proceeds to drown him. Kinda like Dumbledore did on a much larger scale.
1. Imhotep was cursed and specific magic can take away his immortality via his soul. We see his soul clearly taken back to the underworld which renders him mortal. Her soul needed to be called back since she died but due to Imhoteps curse it was different.
2. It's function is death or killing but it's talked about in the films. When the curse rebounded Voldemort's soul latched itself onto Harry creating an unintentional Horcrux. When Voldemort hit Harry later on it killed the horcrux in Harry aka Vodemort's soul. When we see it hit Sirius we see his soul exit so I'm 100 percent correct.
3. The first 2 were correct so yeah I'm still right.
No I don't What I need to compare are the characters in question, which I have done, I don't have to try and compare two sets of magic that is as different from each other as the American system is to the Scandinavian Wellfare System, because I know the differences are to big to even validate a comparison in the first place.
So instead lets look at the characters instead, their capacity and what not. What I don't get is why you stick with AK constantly, when there is a myriad of spells that Voldemort could use against Imhotep, but it's always freaking AK.
And when has Avada Kedavra ever been stated/shown to steal someones soul and work on the undead?(Because Imhotep is undead and you can't kill an undead immortal mummy by trying to kill him) I can do this song and dance too.
And don't be asinine, if Harry Potter can dodge it, and Imhotep was jumping around like a spider monkey and skittering on the ceiling, he can dodge as well. Plus they're on a beach, he can just toss up a barrier of sand to block AK since you know, it can't penetrate anything to get to it's target behind them.
And lol at me being a Fanboy. You ride Voldemort's nose almost as hard as Rogue Jedi used to ride...well a lot of people.
That's in character for him to do. He always used the attack in mostly every encounter. He was ruthless. Imhoteps lax approach of no one can harm me always cost him.
You have yet to prove AV can kill an immortal form Imhotep. You debate based on Voldermort being your favorite, this is what you always do; it is known.
Repeat: Show me a scene where Imhotep is harmed by magic. Show me a scene where an immortal Imhotep dies.
I think we already had that disagreement but nvm. My point is that Voldemort is a very intelligent and very accomplished Wizard, I don't personally see him relying on just AK to finish the job, but whatever.
Avada Kedavra takes the soul from the body and kills you. We've already seen magic successfully take the soul from Imhotep. 2+2=4.
Magic can take his soul effectively depowering him. We've never seen him resist magic only mortal weaponry. Movie clearly makes the point of there being a difference.
So now there are words and phrases I can't use. Calm down.
Where was it seen and stated that it takes the soul from the body? It kills you. And when you die your soul leaves your body because that's what happens in HP. But where exactly is it shown and or stated that AK takes your soul?
I've stated this multiple times. Hit Harry and destroyed /killed Horcrux inside Harry. Sirius soul leaves. Voldemort's soul initially created a Horcrux in Harry when the curse rebounded.
Sirius got hit with Avada Kedavra and fell through the Veil. The gateway between the living world and the spirit world. Other than that he would have just been dead. Like Cedric Diggory. Did we see his soul leave? Nope. Sure didn't. We only saw Sirius become a spirit because he fell through the veil. It took his physical body too.
There was no Horcux inside Harry. Harry was the Horcrux. And Voldie making an accidental Horcrux was a fluke due to the combination of his already fractured soul, Lily's protection, etc...
There's no evidence Avada Kedavra takes your soul. It kills you and your soul leaves your body after you die which happens to everyone who dies. Dumbledore. Snape. Cedric. Sirius. Everyone.
And as Imhotep is Immortal and Undead. And you can't use a killing spell on an undead being. AK being the be all end all is you wanking the the tip of Voldemort's wand yet again as you do in every thread ever of all time. You've got the nerve to call me a fanboy, hah. I bet if you met Voldemort's actor you'd blow your magical load.
Also Voldemort has no defense against the water, sand, air, or TK attacks Imhotep has at his disposal.
First of all, prove that AV"takes the soul from the body and kills you". Cos the most famous AV death (Dumbledore's) didn't have this 'soul taking' you claim. He was hit; he died. Prove it or STFU already.
You're trying to force that AV is the same as the spell used in the book of Amon-Ra, which turned Imhotep mortal, it didn't kill him. So you fail still. Different spells do different things, you should know this being an HP fanatic. Does Confundus do the same thing as AV? No. Cry now.
Did magic kill him? Kill magic harm him while he was immortal? No and no. So you have two more fail arguments you continue to try and sell.
KMC Community Forums
May 1st, 2013 02:58 PM
What I need to compare are the characters in question, which I have done, I don't have to try and compare two sets of magic that is as different from each other as the American system is to the Scandinavian Wellfare System, because I know the differences are to big to even validate a comparison in the first place. 
Does Confundus do the same thing as AV? No. Cry now.
