So now your argument changes since another ignorant poster has challenged me. Ok, sidekick. Dumbledore's soul left we just don't see it aka unless they are in Veil.
Forcing the soul to leave the body renders him mortal. Two birds one stone.
Magic clearly works. Guy got depowered in every movie. He'd wreck anyone with a fun not magic. Facts.
Are you dense? My argument is the same as it's always been, 'AV is not the same as the spell from the book of Amon-Ra.' Yet another claim you can't prove. Figures. Cry more.
Repeating fails is just that.You have yet to prove AV removes the soul, not that it really matters here. You have yet to prove AV is the same as the spell from the book of Amon-Ra. Repeat: Different spells do different things.
A spell designed to take away Imhotep's immortality works, by making him mortal. AV doesn't do that, no matter how hard you cry. AV kills the living. ie "the killing curse". You should know this by now.
Avada Kedavra does not take the soul. The soul leaves the body when you die by any means. And the veil is what took Sirius. Notice his body didn't come out the other side. Hell, in the books it isn't even AK that hits him, it's just a spell that knocks him through the veil.
You have no proof it takes the soul. You also have no proof that Imhotep even has a soul as he is an undead cursed immortal mummy.
And there is no spell in HP to take away a beings immortality and make them mortal, which is exactly what the spells in Mummy 1 and 2 were designed to do. GTFO troll.
I argue in character. He uses the Avada Kedavra more than any other spell. Game over for Imhotep. My arguing is consistent as others tend to jump all over the place unlike myself.
Imhotep is an "Undead" Immortal as he is a mummy, which is classified as an undead being. Just like Inferi are immortal because they're undead. And Dementors. And Vampires.
Gender: Male Location: 4th Street Underpass, Manhattan
But AK might not work here. Remember when AK was used on the Phoenix, and the Phoenix withstood it because it was immortal. It may have the same effect on Tep
You're insisting they're similar. They're two different spells. One kills you. One specically turns a certain immortal to mortal. Apples to oranges. So you fail again.
You have yet to prove AV removes the soul, not that it matters here but it's funny seeing you dance. Could argue that killing Dumbledore with a gun would remove his soul. What do bullets do to Imhotep? Nothing. That's your argument. Nothing.
watch the damn film, dummy. While in his immortal form he was undead. When he gets his arm cut off in the end, we see inside and it's dry, black and mummified still.
Page 7, I had to link you to the dictionary cos you didn't know what immortal means, remember. You fail consistently. "Immortality doesn't mean being immortal to death" - Quanchi112
It's funny I'm the fanboy. When you argue solely for Voldemort, it doesn't matter if he's up against a full on blast from the Death Star or getting shot in the face.
And your last what, 3-5 av's and sigs have been nothing but HP and Voldemort. Yeah, I'm the fanboy here.
The Mummy (1999) - Greatest Films www.filmsite.org/series-mummy.html
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (2008). "The Mummy" Films - Part I. The Mummy (1999) d. ..... No mortal weapon can kill this creature. He's not of this ...
Voldemort is an immortal who uses magic. Clearly you don't comprehend much from your hut.