Amazo, Kid Amazo and Batman both had no idea about the full limit of his powers? If they don't, then who does, you? Superman level strength was what it was described as, and it was in-line with what we saw.
I would, frankly I enjoy doing shit like that. You think I like to dissect all of your feats? I don't have any fun with it, but I can't ignore someone pissing on me and then calling it rain.
Her magical bracers which are enchanted and can deflect energy had no bearing on a pure strength showing? Lol.
If you could, post a bigger scan because the dialogue directly refers to the torch being lit.
It may not be a drastic difference in weight, but it was that weight differential that threw the Earth out of its orbit. So that's what they were struggling with. It's a Kyle feat basically.
So according to you just attempting to move earth is being in control? LOLWUT?
So you concede that they had it in orbit but they were losing it? What are you not understanding here?
Superman was weakened there as well as diana and J'onn. So not really. Go ahead and debunk it.
Thor never won though. Its just thorbags presenting feats and dismissing feats and declaring thor winner.
Striking feat bro. I never said Thor doesn't hits harder than diana with mjolnir. Also its a feat for mjolnir's energy not pure strength of Dargo and Masterson.
No. He wouldn't.
__________________
Last edited by abhilegend on Jun 26th, 2013 at 03:51 AM
Amazo didn't say he had just superman's strength though. He was cut off before he detailed just how strong he was. "Superman's strength, Flash's speed.......". What do you think he would've said about wonder woman and j'onn? Kid Amazo and Batman didn't know about the full powers of Kid Amazo. I don't see why this is so important when Thor stalemating Kurse is a lie too.
As the scan described "buttressed by amazon muscles", no her bracers didn't have anything to do with the strength showing. Her bracers aren't cap's shield which absorbs impacts.
I would. Just gimme a minute. I don't see how that is relevant in the discussion though.
Feat dismissal? You can't be serious here? You've basically thrown out all of Thor's feats, calling most "hyperbolic" or otherwise declaring, quite arbitrarily how or why they don't count. Conversely, people who are critiquing the Diana feat aren't throwing out the whole thing but rather explaining how or why (in their own opinion) how that feat isn't the be-all/end-all considering it was a shared feat, they were ultimately unsuccessful, and we have no idea what of force Diana was contributing.
And again with this "thorbags" shit? It just comes off like you write off anything any one who is arguing in favor of Thor off as garbage and in the same light act like you're the lone bastion of sanity and objectivity here which is...well, not true to be nice. You have two mods who agree Thor is the stronger here, neither of which have an "agenda" or anything so nefarious.
He would overpower Diana, Abhi. Not because I'm a "thorbag" or because I say so, but because feats and evidence suggest it. He wouldn't walk all over her easily, but the gap is noticeable enough for people to see that Thor's the superior physical specimen here.
Am I wrong in assuming that Spectre falling feat was brought up here (noticed "eternity" earlier)?
Which amounts to saying Spectre is infinite time (which I don't think has ever been backed up, nor has Spectre really been "heavy" before or after). Which I'm like 94 percent sure that time is weightless.
KMC Community Forums
Jun 25th, 2013 08:14 PM
