The older Treks for the. Out part hate the newer, better ones. This one is my favorite movie. NuKhan is my favorite character. You don't have the same opinion. Paramount would rather have a fan like myself who spends money and supports the franchise than someone like you tbh.
Sure, tell me what else I've done with my bank account while you're at it.
I don't live in Canada anymore, so buying a region one walmart edition would be pointless.
Though I suppose my Amazon bought copy doesn't measure up. Or the replica phaser. Or the poster. Or the money I spent renting the game. Or the gold captain's shirt. or the money I spent watching it in the cinema. Or the money I spent on the new hdmi cable just so I could hook it up to the projector in the house.
Sure, I didn't spend anything on it at all.
You keep trying to separate the Treks. You really shouldn't. That just makes you a bad Trekkie.
I saw it four times in the movie theatre. I saw it the night it came out. You did not.
I don't believe you about the rest.
Most Trekkies separate them as they are clearly different. That is the point. That's why I like the new ones. JJ hated did not like the older ones as well. I agree with him 100 percent.
Is NuKhan your favorite or Into Darkness your favorite Trek movie ?
And no, to answer your question, neither NuKhan nor Into Darkness is my favourite character/movie. I'm sure you'll use that as some sort of strange ammunition, though.
The sooner you realise that Star Trek is Star Trek is Star Trek, the better.
Oh so you DO care?
The phrase is: "I couldn't care less".
Your desperate rage posting is heading into comedically sad territory Quan.
( Or, as you in your troll rush would put it: )
Typical display of lack of smarts from someone who would fap so hard to new shiny Trek yet hate the classic older stuff so hard and pointlessly.
"Ysperate rage posting moose hading intocomedly sad territry Quim."
Without real Trek, these tangental arc movies of the present would not be in existence. Apologies for you now weeping into your naked-pictures-of-JJ duvet.
__________________
"Van Zan is the Pinocchio of feces." - Lestov16
Last edited by Sadako of Girth on Sep 29th, 2013 at 09:10 AM
Re: Re: Re: Into Darkness named worst Trek movie EVER
It had some flaws, but it also had some very good parts, and the basic plot is still a good one.
I'd rather watch FF again than, say, Insurrection. At least I can laugh at more of FF, some of the bad TNG movies I have trouble thinking of anything to recommend for them.
I dunno if i'll say that they were very good. good, sure, but I think a lot of the movie is basically filler, and that makes it harder to watch than others.
Insurrection has its faults; it's basically a longer episode of TNG. I'd still rate it at least as good as TMP.
Insurrection was a long TNG episode with major plotholes (one doesn't sympathize with the 'primitives,' there's a dozen solutions to the problem that don't mess with anyone since, y'know, there's under 200 'inhabitants'- themselves colonists really- who are isolated in one small area). Villains were pretty two dimensional as well.
TMP had a sense of wonder and discovering something new. Pacing was bad, but the story had a point, and V'ger was cool.
Calm down, old Trekkie. I am the new blood of this franchise. You wish for the days of the old and hate the new action oriented Trek which blows the older lame Trek out of the water.
KMC Community Forums
Sep 29th, 2013 03:44 AM
