No. I'm not disputing or confirming what they know. You are, though. Why do you dispute what they know when you have no measurable basis to validate your refutation? And why do you think your method of refutation is itself indisputable?
__________________ Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
Last edited by KillaKassara on Jun 13th, 2014 at 08:01 AM
In quantum mechanics, mathematically, a certain amount of energy on the planck length can disrupt space time to where anything that goes through ends up in another place and time.
The issue is, why in the world the machines would do this when we consider the solution to grandfather paradox (alternate timelines/dimensions)?
Anything sent into another time is gone from our continuum, what they do to change that past has no effect on the present.
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
Last edited by KillaKassara on Jun 13th, 2014 at 08:20 AM