__________________ "Happiness is a lie. Life is horror. The light is always dying all across the universe. The last star will flicker out someday, when it does, all that remains is shadow. And I will be its king!"'-Amahl Farouk
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Sure, let's BZ it. standard rules. loser can't post in this forum for 6 months.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Then let's lay out the rules for out regular debate. I'll start.
Rule 1. No speculation.
Do you agree with that rule?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Speculation doesn't need to be agreed upon, it is automatically a rule.
If there is firm evidence supporting something then it isn't speculation.
Characters fight at full capacity at all times. That includes speed, reflexes, skill, smarts, etc.
Also we must define proof (since there are multiple definitions differing by multiple degrees).
Is proof (evidentiary standards or burden of proof)
1. Evidence Beyond a reasonable doubt (beyond a 95% chance something is true based off given evidence)
Or
2. Preponderance of the evidence (beyond 50% chance something is true based off given evidence)?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
H1 concession accepted that he can’t move like Bullseye and is nothing but a mere troll. Concepcion accepted that his “debating” is faulty logic meshed together.
You didn't give a valid answer to my question, which to be fair I asked first. yet you expect me to answer your question. that is called a double standard. though to move this forward I'll answer your question, even though you still haven't answered mine.
The answer to your question: I'd say proof would be based on Preponderance of the evidence
Now, are you going to answer my original question. IE, do you agree to the no speculation rule? it's a simple yes or no question.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
KMC Community Forums
Jan 15th, 2020 12:04 AM
2 spellcasters are better than 1
