No, you said "Speculation doesn't need to be agreed upon, it is automatically a rule" yet you didn't state what the rule was. which could allow you to plead ignorance later.
But, thank you for now finally answering my question. it only took me asking it 3 times. you're getting better.
Now, who decides if something rises to the level of firm evidence rather than speculation?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Yes, but who decides whether something meets the requirements of "Preponderance of evidence" IE, beyond 50% chance something is true based off given evidence.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
I'm pretty sure we would agree that something has a more than 50% chance of being true or not. Any borderline 50-50 shit then I'll concede or accept it as speculation.
What proof do you have that Ozy can actually fight fast enough that Captain America would be unable to land even one hit like you claimed?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Movement speed, although sufficient for Ozy, isn't enough to prevent being hit by Cap. He needs perception and reflexes to clearly see the attack. He also needs skill to know how to avoid the attack.
Ozy's movement speed is sufficient due to
1. Visual speed from both
2. Movement speed to defend doesn’t need to be as fast as movement speed to attack.
3. Hand speed in catching the bullet.
Ozy's perception speed is sufficient due to
1. Perceiving the bullet
Ozy's skill in knowing how to avoid attacks is sufficient due to
1. His blocking, ducking, and evading punches kicks and grabs.
Sorry, but being able to move your hand once while outside of combat is hardly proof that you can fight at that speed. Otherwise major league pitchers would be some of the fastest fighters on Earth, which they're not.
So I'll ask again, what proof do you have that Ozy can fight fast enough to avoid being hit by Captain America even once?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
There has been times where cap has caught bullets. Cap has done thing ozzy can't do. Cap has precognition he also can predict movements and has a vast array of fighting styles. Plus he's an All American hero where as Ozzy is a sinister specimen built by the coats of wrath.
__________________ 2 spellcasters are better than 1
Your analogy is faulty because
1. It's impossible to catch a bullet at close range by luck.
2. The writer intended on Ozy being fast enough to move his hands in relation to the speed of the bullets and able to perceive the bullet.
The speed in which someone can move their hand and the speed in which they can perceive motion plays a large role in combat.
Even if Ozy chooses to move his hands at the speed he showed while in combat then Cap still wouldn't be able to land a blow. Ozy would view Cap as a slow turtle due to his perception speed and be able to counter anything Cap throws.
Neither one of us said anything about luck. stop with the strawmanning.
BTW, Nothing you said refutes our points.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
KMC Community Forums
Jan 15th, 2020 10:41 PM
2 spellcasters are better than 1
