The people that debate Anime relies more on collateral damage not knowing everything doesn't circle around that. They think that since Cell can kill Goku with a blast that destroyed Earth, that means they can't withstand planetary attacks not knowing that Cell was powerful enough to kill Goku, even if the planet isn't destroyed during the process. They are also saying that the blast that killed Goku is equal to first form Frieza blast that destroyed planet Vegeta. Ya know, the same Frieza that used a fraction of his 0.025% of his first form power level. If that ain't the most backwards debating style.
Why wouldn't he be able too? If he could kill Frieza with a single hit he should he able too. After all Superman endured, if someone punched him so hard he blew up, do you think they could destroy a planet?
Not talking about the non canon movie...I'm talking about in general. Super Saiyan 2 Gohan CAN kill Frieza in a single hit because he did it against beings far more durable. Frieza father even said Frieza is more durable than a planet so why couldn't Gohan do what he did against Frieza against a planet?
You're talking about blasts...I'm talking about physical strength. There's a difference ya know. We have confirmation that Frieza is more durable than a planet. If someone punch a hole clean through him or make him explode from the inside out with a single hit, that speaks volumes.
Has pein tanked a city busting attack before? Don't know why you keep bringing that up. If Pein tanked said attack and someone blew him up with a single hit, I sure as hell would think he could destroy a planet.
Example, I don't need proof that Doomsday can destroy a city block, etc...with his fist, let alone possibly destroy a planet. Even though he doesn't have a single destructive ft like that, him easily damaging beings like Darkseid and Superman is proof enough. Do you not understand this? You keep bringing up this guy...has he destroyed someone that tanked a planetary attack? If so, I would have no doubts in his capabilities of destroying a planet.
nobody in dbz has tanked a pb so whats your point?
because you guys must not have been reading the post i was talking about before dude said gohan could blow a planet with a punch which makes absolutely so sense.
sure with a ki blast he could do it but that doesn't equate to physical strength
__________________ Even if we are fallen is it wrong to fight for what you believe in?
We are True Avengers
Frieza tanked planetary attacks though and he is one of the less durable individuals in Z.
They withstood far greater than planet busting. Any attack that could kill Frieza is >>>> planet busting. Any blast that could kill Superman is greater than planet busting. Any blast that could kill Darkseid is greater than planet busting. That's why I posted the clips above but you failed to answer it. Again, which blast is more powerful in the youtube videos? This will answer your question.
Goku kayoken Kamehameha times 3 is planet busting and Goku threw the same blast at Frieza but time 20 and Frieza tanked the attack and was pissed because it darkened his hand and this came from a much more powerful Goku.
That's one planet busting plus ft. Second...he was near death, chopped in half, then got blasted to more bits by Goku final attack and he still withstood Namek exploding on him.
That's 2.
With that said, the weakest of DBZ characters endured planet busting attacks. Then Frieza father said Frieza is more durable than a planet.
Prove that he didn't allow the ki to hit him in the face because he was ENGULFED in the blast.
He didn't nearly die from the planet explosion, he nearly died from Goku. He was a goner after the last attack but be lived. If you think about it, Namek explosion didn't do anything to him since he was already messed up beforehand.
KMC Community Forums
Nov 18th, 2014 01:24 PM
