So that must make almost every character to character comparison unsound across the internet. From Silver Surfer vs Morg to Thor vs Durok. You must be very frustrated not being able to enjoy character debates on message boards. I suggest you brush up on storytelling devices and the concept of dramatic conflict before you go sprouting about circular reasoning and other logical fallacies you've memorized the definitions of over the years in a rather pedantic attempt to make your VERY SIMPLE arguments look more impressive than they are.
A true circular argument would look something like this Naija Boy
Hulk is the strongest one there is because it was stated.
The strongest one there is the Hulk because it was stated.
This argument is without EVIDENCE that PROVES that conclusion.
Superman vs Doomsday would NOT be a circular argument.
We know the durability of Superman and have many feats to see how incredible it is. Doomsday's strength overcoming that durability is the EVIDENCE that we need to prove the statement that Doomsday has PHENOMENAL strength.
Doomsday in addition to beating up Superman has slapped around other characters just as easily, but even if we didn't have those examples he know how Superman relates to other top tiers and villains within the DC Universe, and the fact he died trying to overcome Doomsday's durability would be the EVIDENCE we need to make a conclusion that Doomsday has PHENOMENAL durability as well just off him fighting and killing Superman.
It would also be EVIDENCE of Superman's great Strength in killing Doomsday, since we have many feats to judge Superman's strength and in that story he had never had to work that hard before against a being strong enough to kill the greatest hero in the DC Universe. And this would also count towards Superman's durability which has stood up to everything from black holes to supernovas that he endured such a beating long enough to kill said opponent.
I don't know if you're ignoring this, being purposely obtuse, or just trying to provide misdirection from the argument you put forth but I sincerely want you to know that I find it to be a distraction from actual honest debating.
I wish you stuck to the merits of defending the argument you put forth. It's a shame that this is your last words on the topic but since you don't want to even think of reexamining your position or even entertain the stance that Prime can legitimately be stronger I guess I should not be surprised.
Last edited by Sensui on Oct 25th, 2014 at 07:01 PM
Who is actually in the House of El? Because I see many people claiming to be a part of it, but then I see them post insane things regarding the House of El.
WBH destroyed a planet, a shared feat. SBP destroyed multiple planets, Universes and moved the frigging center of the Universe with his bare hands... this is spite, he stomps.
__________________
Sig made by my mate, the one and only One_Angry_Scot
__________________ Darwin's theory of evolution is the great white elephant of contemporary thought. It is large, completely useless, and the object of superstitious awe.-Dr. David Berlinski, Philosophy
Most people believe Evolution not because they themselves are dumb, but cause they trust the "experts" who are feeding them evolutionary fast food, and so they don't bother questioning whether or not it's true.