I'm referring to energy durability, not blunt force. Mjolnir absorption abilities are crazy, yet the Destroyer blast still sliced it.
You are also using ABC logic.
You are saying that since Tyrant can withstand blasts that can damage galaxies then Destroyer can't harm him. This is ABC logic.
Also, as far as blunt force, Mjolnir is more durable than Galactus (peer to Tyrant).
FP Tyrant would have problems with a normal Destroyer before winning.
my god you are so dense. Prove the durability to different attacks is weaker or stronger. PG Thor struggle whilst absorbing a blast from Thanos so don't give me the 1/5th absorbing feat is standard.
Never said Tyrsnt can't be harmed you said, the destroyer one shots him which is BS.
You don't u understand Odins Galaxy feat is a shared one which happened ages ago. He doesn't regularly do stuff like that.
Only we saw Odin wasn't on Galactus' level, yet we know Tyrant was. Just the way the cookie crumbles bud. Besides we already saw Tyrant regenerating stuff on a whim. It's okay Abhi... tyrant can also beat DS relatively easily as well
Neither does Galactus normally operate at those levels. Remember Mjolnir is more durable than Galactus. This is a constant fact.
My logic for the one shot is
A normal Destroyer slicing Mjolnir. Thus means that a normal Destroyer can damage Tyrant since he is less durable than Mjolnir. The visor blast is more powerful and should damage Tyrant even more. Now a 2000ft Destroyer is vastly more powerful and it's blasts should do tremendously more damage. Its visor blasts will do even more (which one shots Tyrant).
My second reason is that the impenetrable barrier the Celestials set up was more durable than Tyrant. Yet 2000ft Destroyer disintegrated it with its visor blast.
This is the 2000ft Destroyer which is far more powerful than Odin.
Also we saw how Galactus feared Odin when he went inside a normal sizedsized Destroyer (not the 2000ft one). The writer portrayed them in this case as peers. Otherwise, Galactus wouldn't have folded. He knew that he could possibly lose.
There is strong evidence to suggest that Odin inside the normal sized Destroyer was a peer to Galactus. This is why Galactus chose to flee. It would been a very hard fight for Galactus if he chose to fight.
Now the 2000ft Destroyer is vastly more powerful as it's empowered by all of Asgard as well as multiple skyfathers.
Galactus chose not to fight as it didn't contribute to his plans/end goal.
It's easy to use one time showings like you do. Galactus fight with Scier/The Other had more of a effect on the multiverse than Odin or Destroyer ever has. It's easy to go down this route.
Galactus reformed from a blast by 5 cosmic containment units, that's far above anything Destroyer can do. Tyrsnt was equal to Galactus.
Galactus was disintegrated by a power that hid itself from the senses of all the higher ups in the Marvel Cosmic Hierarchy, that imprisoned Eternity AND Infinity, that was powerful enough to stop the Ultimate Nullifier from working, all the while merging two universes.
"Solar System level"
__________________
..even the outer hells are indifferent matters for they bow only to potent and archaic Nodens.
And in the end it was the power of Galactus that broke apart the hold the five cosmic containment units had over infinity and eternity through using Gamora as a conduit.
That's not what I was getting at. Collateral damage isn't a correct gauge of the true power of the attack.
According to you Pre Retcon MM and Beyonder are "apartment level" because a billion dimension slagging blast couldn't even destroy Marsha's apartment : (please log in to view the image)
__________________
..even the outer hells are indifferent matters for they bow only to potent and archaic Nodens.
The solar system/galaxy destroying blast totally drained Galactus of all his power. (At the time of publishing of this comic, it was just above three solar system level blast. Thanos Imperative changed it to Galaxy level blast).
While Odin can toss galaxy busting attacks nilly willy. Against both Infinity and Seth.
KMC Community Forums
Nov 19th, 2015 04:53 PM
