KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Religion Forum » How old is the Earth?

How old is the earth?
You do not have permission to vote on this poll.
6,000 years (as stated in the Bible) 5 14.29%
4.5 billion years (as stated in science) 30 85.71%
Total: 35 votes 100%
  [Edit Poll (moderators only)]

How old is the Earth?
Started by: DarthAnt66

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (9): « 1 [2] 3 4 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
Surtur
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Chicago

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by meep-meep
The Earth is so old she took her drivers' test on a dinosaur.


20 seconds later the dinosaur was murdered and eaten by cavemen.


__________________
Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 05:53 PM
Surtur is currently offline Click here to Send Surtur a Private Message Find more posts by Surtur Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Adam Grimes
Devil On Your Shoulder

Gender: Male
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Surtur
20 seconds later the dinosaur was murdered and eaten by cavemen.
His name was 'Starsie'.


__________________


Not today, not tomorrow...

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 05:59 PM
Adam Grimes is currently offline Click here to Send Adam Grimes a Private Message Find more posts by Adam Grimes Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
meep-meep
What are you angry about?

Gender: Male
Location: Kenosha

Starsie so old he got his bible signed by Jesus.


__________________
Listen, boy. Have you ever had your scrotum pulled off by a mountain goat and seen him sell it on eBay a day later?

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 06:12 PM
meep-meep is currently offline Click here to Send meep-meep a Private Message Find more posts by meep-meep Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Star428
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: USA

Account Restricted

100 reasons why evolution is stupid:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ga33t0NI6Fk


The speaker in that video is an extremely smart guy who has studied both science and religion. If you're not interested in hearing him talk about the Bible then just fast forward to about the 2:00 mark in video. He starts giving many scientific common sense reasons why macro-evolution is stupid. He starts by breaking down the six different types of evolution:

1. Cosmic evolution
2. chemical evolution
3. Stellar and planetary evolution
4. organic evolution
5. macro-evolution
6. micro-evolution

...then he destroys one-by-one the arguments for each one and explains why all of them (besides the last one)doesn't make any sense whatsoever. For the most part, he uses SCIENCE to destroy the arguments for each one. As for the last one, micro-evolution, he acknowledges that there's plenty of proof for that (as do I) but then goes on to explain why the name "micro-evolution" is not a good description of what actually takes place. Adaptation is a much better term to use for number 6.


As he points out in the video, Darwinian evolution-that is, the first 5 types above are nothing more than a religion since it is based on assumptions/beliefs and no proof whatsoever. It's a highly educational video and very entertaining as well. Highly recommended.


__________________
Darwin's theory of evolution is the great white elephant of contemporary thought. It is large, completely useless, and the object of superstitious awe.-Dr. David Berlinski, Philosophy
Most people believe Evolution not because they themselves are dumb, but cause they trust the "experts" who are feeding them evolutionary fast food, and so they don't bother questioning whether or not it's true.

Last edited by Star428 on Dec 24th, 2015 at 06:25 PM

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 06:14 PM
Star428 is currently offline Click here to Send Star428 a Private Message Find more posts by Star428 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Star428
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: USA

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by meep-meep
Starsie so old he got his bible signed by Jesus.




What a shame. You called me a childish name so now I have to put you on ignore. How unfortunate. sad


Have a Merry Christmas, you asswipe. smile


__________________
Darwin's theory of evolution is the great white elephant of contemporary thought. It is large, completely useless, and the object of superstitious awe.-Dr. David Berlinski, Philosophy
Most people believe Evolution not because they themselves are dumb, but cause they trust the "experts" who are feeding them evolutionary fast food, and so they don't bother questioning whether or not it's true.

Last edited by Star428 on Dec 24th, 2015 at 06:21 PM

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 06:15 PM
Star428 is currently offline Click here to Send Star428 a Private Message Find more posts by Star428 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Star428
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: USA

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Star428
100 reasons why evolution is stupid:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ga33t0NI6Fk


The speaker in that video is an extremely smart guy who has studied both science and religion. If you're not interested in hearing him talk about the Bible then just fast forward to about the 2:00 mark in video. He starts giving many scientific common sense reasons why macro-evolution is stupid. He starts by breaking down the six different types of evolution:

1. Cosmic evolution
2. chemical evolution
3. Stellar and planetary evolution
4. organic evolution
5. macro-evolution
6. micro-evolution

...then he destroys one-by-one the arguments for each one and explains why all of them (besides the last one)doesn't make any sense whatsoever. For the most part, he uses SCIENCE to destroy the arguments for each one. As for the last one, micro-evolution, he acknowledges that there's plenty of proof for that (as do I) but then goes on to explain why the name "micro-evolution" is not a good description of what actually takes place. Adaptation is a much better term to use for number 6.


As he points out in the video, Darwinian evolution-that is, the first 5 types above are nothing more than a religion since it is based on assumptions/beliefs and no proof whatsoever. It's a highly educational video and very entertaining as well. Highly recommended.




Made a slight mistake above where I said adaptation is a better term for number six. I meant to say that either adaptation or variation is a better term.


__________________
Darwin's theory of evolution is the great white elephant of contemporary thought. It is large, completely useless, and the object of superstitious awe.-Dr. David Berlinski, Philosophy
Most people believe Evolution not because they themselves are dumb, but cause they trust the "experts" who are feeding them evolutionary fast food, and so they don't bother questioning whether or not it's true.

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 06:36 PM
Star428 is currently offline Click here to Send Star428 a Private Message Find more posts by Star428 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Surtur
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Chicago

Account Restricted

Star just gave you the best present ever meep.

I also still indeed hope bluewaterrider is full of wonder over all of Star's recent posts...I sure as shit know I am wondering about them myself.


__________________
Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 06:38 PM
Surtur is currently offline Click here to Send Surtur a Private Message Find more posts by Surtur Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Adam Grimes
Devil On Your Shoulder

Gender: Male
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Star428
100 reasons why evolution is stupid:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ga33t0NI6Fk


The speaker in that video is an extremely smart guy who has studied both science and religion. If you're not interested in hearing him talk about the Bible then just fast forward to about the 2:00 mark in video. He starts giving many scientific common sense reasons why macro-evolution is stupid. He starts by breaking down the six different types of evolution:

1. Cosmic evolution
2. chemical evolution
3. Stellar and planetary evolution
4. organic evolution
5. macro-evolution
6. micro-evolution

...then he destroys one-by-one the arguments for each one and explains why all of them (besides the last one)doesn't make any sense whatsoever. For the most part, he uses SCIENCE to destroy the arguments for each one. As for the last one, micro-evolution, he acknowledges that there's plenty of proof for that (as do I) but then goes on to explain why the name "micro-evolution" is not a good description of what actually takes place. Adaptation is a much better term to use for number 6.


As he points out in the video, Darwinian evolution-that is, the first 5 types above are nothing more than a religion since it is based on assumptions/beliefs and no proof whatsoever. It's a highly educational video and very entertaining as well. Highly recommended.
I wish someone could give me 100 reasons why you are so stupid.


__________________


Not today, not tomorrow...

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 06:52 PM
Adam Grimes is currently offline Click here to Send Adam Grimes a Private Message Find more posts by Adam Grimes Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
meep-meep
What are you angry about?

Gender: Male
Location: Kenosha

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Surtur
Star just gave you the best present ever meep.

I also still indeed hope bluewaterrider is full of wonder over all of Star's recent posts...I sure as shit know I am wondering about them myself.


All it took was a few yo mama jokes. No harm was intended. Just trying to spread some juvenile humor. meh. No foxes.


__________________
Listen, boy. Have you ever had your scrotum pulled off by a mountain goat and seen him sell it on eBay a day later?

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 06:52 PM
meep-meep is currently offline Click here to Send meep-meep a Private Message Find more posts by meep-meep Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Prof. T.C McAbe
Kryptonian Scientist

Gender: Male
Location: BatCave

Let's ask the oldest being on earth, one that has witnessed all the events some billion years ago. BADABING!


__________________


Sig made by my mate, the one and only One_Angry_Scot

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 06:57 PM
Prof. T.C McAbe is currently offline Click here to Send Prof. T.C McAbe a Private Message Find more posts by Prof. T.C McAbe Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Surtur
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Chicago

Account Restricted

Badabing almost sounds like "big bang". Coincidence?


__________________
Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 07:54 PM
Surtur is currently offline Click here to Send Surtur a Private Message Find more posts by Surtur Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Trocity
Undefeated and Undisputed

Gender: Male
Location: Champion's Field

Every species on earth evolved from the raptor.


__________________

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 08:20 PM
Trocity is currently offline Click here to Send Trocity a Private Message Find more posts by Trocity Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
StiltmanFTW
CBvF

Gender: Male
Location: The Wiltshire Estates

quote: (post)
Originally posted by meep-meep
Starsie so old he got his bible signed by Jesus.


laughing out loud


__________________

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 09:48 PM
StiltmanFTW is currently offline Click here to Send StiltmanFTW a Private Message Find more posts by StiltmanFTW Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Tattoos N Scars
Modern Day Drifter

Gender: Male
Location: Deep South

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Star428
Made a slight mistake above where I said adaptation is a better term for number six. I meant to say that either adaptation or variation is a better term.


You don't really need all of that. They can't prove abiogenesis in the origin of life theory. Too many gaps missing for them to successfully reproduce it in a controlled experiment and have it become visble enough to eventually make a life form. We have no clue what the exact conditions were like at that time that made life possible. In that point, there is not much for them to argue against intelligent design.


__________________

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 09:58 PM
Tattoos N Scars is currently offline Click here to Send Tattoos N Scars a Private Message Find more posts by Tattoos N Scars Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Surtur
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Chicago

Account Restricted

I love how Star thinks a "really smart guy" would be talking about how evolution is stupid.


__________________
Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 10:14 PM
Surtur is currently offline Click here to Send Surtur a Private Message Find more posts by Surtur Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Surtur
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Chicago

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
We have no clue what the exact conditions were like at that time that made life possible. In that point, there is not much for them to argue against intelligent design.


There is literally no actual evidence for intelligent design. That is all that needs to be said to "argue against" it. There is not a shred of concrete evidence of this.

The fact we have no clue about what certain conditions were like actually doesn't lend any credibility to intelligent design. This is a mistake I constantly see religious people making. They think the fact we don't have an explanation for something(yet) somehow equates to intelligent design. The other problem is intelligent design in itself doesn't come anywhere close to proving the existence of the biblical God. So it is strange when I see religious people using the phrase when I know deep down they don't believe in intelligent design they believe in the prick from the bible. They just try to science it up a bit because they wrongly assume it lends some kind of credibility to the entire thing.

Intelligent design could mean that whatever created us was a gay pink skinned alien named Bob. I wonder if Star would accept that though? Since he couldn't prove the entity behind intelligent design wasn't such a being.

It's also fascinating how Star can hone in on the people claiming evolution isn't a thing and say they "destroy" the arguments of it, but ALL the people of science who destroy arguments saying evolution isn't a thing? Not a peep about them, those people won't be addressed at all.

I mean I could provide videos of people who believe in evolution utterly dismantling religious people who do not. In an actual debates no less.


__________________
Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.

Last edited by Surtur on Dec 24th, 2015 at 10:31 PM

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 10:17 PM
Surtur is currently offline Click here to Send Surtur a Private Message Find more posts by Surtur Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
quanchi112
Disney

Gender: Male
Location: Best company on the planet

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Surtur
There is literally no actual evidence for intelligent design. That is all that needs to be said to "argue against" it. There is not a shred of concrete evidence of this.

The fact we have no clue about what certain conditions were like actually doesn't lend any credibility to intelligent design. This is a mistake I constantly see religious people making. They think the fact we don't have an explanation for something(yet) somehow equates to intelligent design. The other problem is intelligent design in itself doesn't come anywhere close to proving the existence of the biblical God. So it is strange when I see religious people using the phrase when I know deep down they don't believe in intelligent design they believe in the prick from the bible. They just try to science it up a bit because they wrongly assume it lends some kind of credibility to the entire thing.

Intelligent design could mean that whatever created us was a gay pink skinned alien named Bob. I wonder if Star would accept that though? Since he couldn't prove the entity behind intelligent design wasn't such a being.

It's also fascinating how Star can hone in on the people claiming evolution isn't a thing and say they "destroy" the arguments of it, but ALL the people of science who destroy arguments saying evolution isn't a thing? Not a peep about them, those people won't be addressed at all.

I mean I could provide videos of people who believe in evolution utterly dismantling religious people who do not. In an actual debates no less.
thumb up


__________________

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 10:34 PM
quanchi112 is currently offline Click here to Send quanchi112 a Private Message Find more posts by quanchi112 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Star428
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: USA

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
You don't really need all of that. They can't prove abiogenesis in the origin of life theory. Too many gaps missing for them to successfully reproduce it in a controlled experiment and have it become visble enough to eventually make a life form. We have no clue what the exact conditions were like at that time that made life possible. In that point, there is not much for them to argue against intelligent design.




Oh, I agree but just wanted to show that there's a lot more than just that one point you're referring to that proves evolution is nothing more than a religion. The speaker in that video exposes at least a hundred holes in evolutionary so-called "theory".


__________________
Darwin's theory of evolution is the great white elephant of contemporary thought. It is large, completely useless, and the object of superstitious awe.-Dr. David Berlinski, Philosophy
Most people believe Evolution not because they themselves are dumb, but cause they trust the "experts" who are feeding them evolutionary fast food, and so they don't bother questioning whether or not it's true.

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 10:47 PM
Star428 is currently offline Click here to Send Star428 a Private Message Find more posts by Star428 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Adam Grimes
Devil On Your Shoulder

Gender: Male
Location:

I like how Starsie keeps saying evolution is stupid and false but he also says it's a religion because of it...?


__________________


Not today, not tomorrow...

Old Post Dec 24th, 2015 11:11 PM
Adam Grimes is currently offline Click here to Send Adam Grimes a Private Message Find more posts by Adam Grimes Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Tattoos N Scars
Modern Day Drifter

Gender: Male
Location: Deep South

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Surtur
There is literally no actual evidence for intelligent design. That is all that needs to be said to "argue against" it. There is not a shred of concrete evidence of this.

The fact we have no clue about what certain conditions were like actually doesn't lend any credibility to intelligent design. This is a mistake I constantly see religious people making. They think the fact we don't have an explanation for something(yet) somehow equates to intelligent design. The other problem is intelligent design in itself doesn't come anywhere close to proving the existence of the biblical God. So it is strange when I see religious people using the phrase when I know deep down they don't believe in intelligent design they believe in the prick from the bible. They just try to science it up a bit because they wrongly assume it lends some kind of credibility to the entire thing.

Intelligent design could mean that whatever created us was a gay pink skinned alien named Bob. I wonder if Star would accept that though? Since he couldn't prove the entity behind intelligent design wasn't such a being.

It's also fascinating how Star can hone in on the people claiming evolution isn't a thing and say they "destroy" the arguments of it, but ALL the people of science who destroy arguments saying evolution isn't a thing? Not a peep about them, those people won't be addressed at all.

I mean I could provide videos of people who believe in evolution utterly dismantling religious people who do not. In an actual debates no less.


Can you please calm down. I know we believe differently, but I don't hold anything against you. Don"t get ip in arms over what is said on here. It is just a discussion board.


__________________

Old Post Dec 25th, 2015 01:38 AM
Tattoos N Scars is currently offline Click here to Send Tattoos N Scars a Private Message Find more posts by Tattoos N Scars Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 04:27 AM.
Pages (9): « 1 [2] 3 4 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Religion Forum » How old is the Earth?

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.