where do you get the numbers from? are they stated? as i remember he lost his flight in the early stages when he just got to earth. when the metal men attacked him he already couldnt fly. also he broke time barriers when very depowered but gets beat up by batman 1 million who is simply a maeta? and once again one shotted by ultron. do you see a skayfather or even trans leveler going down like that?
Re: Help me undrstand the next characters power level
1. Mr Sinister-low herald
2. Apocalypse-mid herald
3. Super Boy Prime-high trans
4. Super Boy Prime on Guardian Amp-skyfather
5. Kal Kent-skyfather
6. King Thor-skyfather
7. Black Panther(strength wise - peak human, enhanced, super human)-peak human
8. Wolverine( strength wise - peak human, enhanced, super human)-peak human
9. achilles (DC COMICS)
10. Thanos-high trans
11. WWH-high herald
12.WBH-low trans
can you provide the evidence he is 1/10000th of hiw power? quoting yourself saying that in other thread is not evidence.
where is it stated that he was depowered completely when batman beats him?
i meant ultraman. still one shotted him while he had a good amount of his powers since he could fly. kal kent also seems to always avoid fighting and let even wonder woman do the fighting for him. he is like beast from the x men. doesnt do the fighting
in death of wolverine they stated even without the healing factor he still could resist the poison for a while because of his super human strength and abilities. so by that and feats maybe he is enhanced to very low level of super human. also in his fights vs beats he always overpowers beast physically. and beast is what class 2? i think he is somewhere around beast and blade level of strength. but thats just my opinion
i actually like Scott since the House of M. to me his character was unrelatable until you see him actually struggle with hard decisions and you see his process. He seems less of the boy scout.
Namor to me has and more than likely will always be cool if hits on Sue Storm and the likes.
we can all agree that they took Charles' character and drug it through the mud and then tried to flush the evidence. its like they refused to let him have any role except for leader/mentor or behind the scenes/ string puller but it kinda makes sense. He had a dream, the dream has been carried on/taken over by others he would be pressed to feel relevant or feel responsible for the overall success or failure of that dream which is his legacy and seemingly only reason to exist.
i actually like Scott since the House of M. to me his character was unrelatable until you see him actually struggle with hard decisions and you see his process. He seems less of the boy scout.
Namor to me has and more than likely will always be cool if hits on Sue Storm and the likes.
we can all agree that they took Charles' character and drug it through the mud and then tried to flush the evidence. its like they refused to let him have any role except for leader/mentor or behind the scenes/ string puller but it kinda makes sense. He had a dream, the dream has been carried on/taken over by others he would be pressed to feel relevant or feel responsible for the overall success or failure of that dream which is his legacy and seemingly only reason to exist.