Hey dipshit: nobody said it equates to Jim Crow laws. I asked you flat out what you feel enforced meant. You said you go by the dictionary definition and not feelings. I give you it the definition, and then you go "oh you're stripping it of historical context and it's true meaning!". Then you say it's semantics...semantics to go by the definition you *just said you go by*.
You are an idiot. There is no way around this. Either you are trolling or you have some mental deficiency.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
you're the one trying to assert a false-equivalency, simple guy. your life is a joke.
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Last edited by Bashar Teg on May 10th, 2017 at 02:11 PM
Lol dude, stop posting. You are digging this hole deeper. I flat out went by what *you* provided. You told me it wasn't enforced segregation. I asked you what you feel enforced means, you said you don't "feel" meanings you look them up in the dictionary. I do so, I provide the definition, and suddenly you aren't so fond of dictionaries anymore.
You're pathetic at this point.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
oh look the same semantics games. you're so clever to repeat it. that's a 5x combo pretend win you've racked up so far. keep it up, clownshoes.
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Lmao, don't like your own posts being used against you....do you?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
oh wait, you pretend-won this argument as well? good for you
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
What Surt appears to be saying is that so long as no white people turn up and are then forcibly removed it's not segregation and therefore... not racist.
What a ridiculous position you've worked yourself into.
eventually we'll realize that we've been defending something JUST LIKE jim-crow all along. because technically if a white person was asked to leave an all-black college party, thats racial segregation.
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Lol, yeah...pretty much this is what you fall back on every time now when your BS is called out. Either you act like people are dodging stuff in order to call you out, or you dismiss it as a "pretend victory". It's funny.
But there is no victory for me here. You pretty much defeated yourself.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Nice try, I went by what Bash said. It's enforced segregation, what does enforced mean? I gave the dictionary definition, which he said he uses.
I never said they would for sure physically remove whites if they showed up, but unless they are going to actually allow whites to just stay if they try to crash it(I doubt it) yeah, that is enforcing segregation.
This isn't hard, I'm going by your pals own posts.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
That's a terrible argument.
By that logic you could just ignore any black person who claims to have faced hateful slurs or racism by saying "well that's a shitty false equivalency your trying to draw between that and slavery! You ****ing idiot!"
Just because one immoral thing is not taken to the same magnitude as something else doesn't mean it's not wrong.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
so we're back to the question: what was immoral about black college kids throwing a black's only party that they paid for? why should they be demonized exclusively while other ethnicities are permitted do the same, unchallenged?
my guess: because racists refuse to see that "white" is not an ethnicity in america, but rather a collection of euro-american ethnicities which deliberately and conveniently excludes non-white americans.
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Last edited by Bashar Teg on May 10th, 2017 at 03:10 PM
maybe i'll get another "agree to disagree" non-retort. we shall see.
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Here's the issue though, I never see these gatherings discussed as a matter of ethnicity. I don't see why black specifically implies "those of lost ethnicities because of slavery" because I've never seen anybody before you ever make that distinction or bring that up as a topic of conversation.
In fact, I've looked it up and the articles I can find defending it seem to suggest this movement was borne out of activism specifically related to racial tension rather than ethnicity, and as is shown by the first article no distinction is made between blacks descended from slaves and those descended from voluntary immigrants, which does make it seem based around race rather than ethnicity: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/harvard-ho...ts-only-1620929
Every article in defense of it and the students who put it on identify it as being based around race and racial tensions rather than ethnic ties in slavery, and you're the only person identifying it as ethnic, so this notion that it's justified because its based around ethnicity rather than race is one that I simply don't think is substantiated by any evidence or discussion that went behind or in defense of this ceremony.
Additionally I noticed in one of those articles that Harvard is for the third year in a row having a special graduation ceremony for Latino students, which is a race rather than a single ethnicity, and unlike with descendants of slaves there isn't that same ethnic confusion you've cited in defense of blacks. Do you consider this to be racist?: https://scholar.harvard.edu/nlanter...uation-ceremony
And lastly, though this entire post has been arguing against this ceremony, I did come across something in one of these articles that, to the credit of those hosting this ceremony, makes me look at it in a less negative light, and it's one relevant to your discussion with Surtur:
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
that's your evidence to dismiss my point that afro-american is the defacto ethnicity of the majority of american black people because of slavery? that you never heard it?
the debate is over whether it is wrong/racist for black people to have a blacks-only party, and whether that equates to whites-only. what you are attempting is to shift the debate from this and turn it into a character-trial of this particular group. weak
because fact dictates that the majority of black americans are of untraceable slave decent. but you've never heard this before so somehow that means the fact is wrong.
no i do not consider it racist, given that it's not a majority-collective of americans designed to exclude a small minority of americans. that doesn't mean i like it. (i dislike isolationist cliques of all kinds) same for asian-only or muslim-only. if a latinos-only ceremony was held in a latino-majority country, it most certainly would be racist.
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Last edited by Bashar Teg on May 10th, 2017 at 04:01 PM
TIL: Self funded private party of black students is equivalent to 'Whites Only" schools, bathrooms, drinking fountains, forced sitting at the back of the bus, theater, stadiums etc., cos reasons
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
I am unable to respond today due to a physics final this evening and a calculus final tomorrow morning. I'll get back to you tomorrow or friday.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
they didn't actually say that in those words. just implied the shit out of it.
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
KMC Community Forums
May 10th, 2017 02:02 PM
