Talon Fang
Restricted
Gender: Location:
Account Restricted
So sad that such a good movie is being ignored like this.
Apr 21st, 2019 12:57 AM
Kazenji
Onyx Prime
Gender: Male Location: Australia
I'm interested in seeing in how WB's make Mr Mind work for the sequel.
__________________
Apr 21st, 2019 12:59 AM
Talon Fang
Restricted
Gender: Location:
Account Restricted
Would love to see the Monster Society of Evil.
Apr 21st, 2019 01:25 AM
Inhuman
|||||||||||||||||
Gender: Male Location: ||||||
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Talon Fang
So sad that such a good movie is being ignored like this.
How is it being ignored. It falls in line with the type of movie it is which had a similar feeling to Spy kids.
__________________
Apr 21st, 2019 02:46 AM
Talon Fang
Restricted
Gender: Location:
Account Restricted
I don't see the resemblance to spy kids. Maybe it is the lack of nauseating 3D.
Apr 21st, 2019 02:51 AM
ares834
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: United States
Nor do I other then it having a child protagansist.
It was a fine charming movie I felt, though nothing truly special.
Apr 21st, 2019 03:10 AM
Inhuman
|||||||||||||||||
Gender: Male Location: ||||||
Not just the kids protagonists, but the feel, the effects like the smoke monsters, etc, the jokes, the dialog, all that.
And comparing them to Spy kids, Percy Jackson, and the like wasnt meant to be an insult, because some of those movies were "fun" as well.
__________________
Apr 21st, 2019 03:50 AM
ares834
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: United States
Insult or not, I don’t really see the similarities with what you brought up. I will agree with the comparison to Percy Jackson however.
Apr 21st, 2019 04:26 AM
Darth Thor
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: Asgard
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Inhuman
and the like wasnt meant to be an insult, because some of those movies were "fun" as well.
Even this sounds like an insult.
Give it a rest, it is one of the DCEUs best, if not The Best.
Sure it was no GOTG, which was also “fun”, but a heart warming and very enjoyable flick nonetheless.
Apr 21st, 2019 07:19 AM
Putinbot1
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified Location:
Account Restricted
Good film, nuff said!
__________________
Apr 21st, 2019 02:59 PM
celeyhyga17
Yawning Void
Gender: Unspecified Location: Nidavellir
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Senor Cage
Why you say that? It's having good legs, actually.
It's been out for weeks. $120 domestic is horrible for a high profile movie.
__________________
Apr 21st, 2019 03:24 PM
ares834
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: United States
Not really. It's pretty typical actually, it's just these big franchise movies tend to make far more.
Apr 21st, 2019 04:31 PM
BrolyBlack
Restricted
Gender: Male Location: Among The Stars
Account Restricted
This was a great movie. Anyone that says otherwise is hating. I can’t stand DC movies but they did a good job here.
__________________
Apr 21st, 2019 04:32 PM
Senor Cage
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location:
quote: (post ) Originally posted by celeyhyga17
It's been out for weeks. $120 domestic is horrible for a high profile movie.
No. It's been out 3 weeks, and relative to its budget, itll make a nice profit. Its not a flop, by text book definition. Also, read the Forbes article I posted. SHAZAM already broke even. Everything after that is gravy. It's basically DCEU Ant-Man.
Apr 21st, 2019 10:15 PM
Darth Thor
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: Asgard
^ Its probably broken even now, but thats not guaranteed. Either way it hardly has a few days left to make profit.
Apr 22nd, 2019 07:22 AM
Senor Cage
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location:
Nobody really knows what the break even point is. But, I'd take the Forbes article as the only source, so...
Apr 22nd, 2019 07:46 AM
Senor Cage
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location:
An updated article, if anyone is interested.
'Captain Marvel' And 'Shazam' Both Just Hit Big Box Office Milestones
quote: First off, Shazam! earned $17.34 million in its third weekend of domestic release, bringing its 17-day cume to $121.342 million. That's a stunning 29% drop, which is lower than the 29.5% third-weekend drop for Wonder Woman back in 2017. Yes, that's partially because of Good Friday and Easter Sunday, but that's still a hell of a hold for the DC Films flick. Heck, it's the seventh-smallest third-weekend-drop for any big comic book and/or superhero movie over the last 32 years.
For reference (and I'm being generous with the "superhero" designation), it's behind Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (+15% in 2018), The Matrix (-20% in 1999), Blade (whose third weekend was Labor Day in 1998), The Crow (whose third weekend was Memorial Day in 1994), Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves (-28% in 1991), Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (-25% in 1990) and Robocop (-26% in 1987). That may not mean anything in the long run, but it took me too long to look that up (even Batman dipped 36% in weekend three and Wonder Woman dipped 29.5% in weekend three) for me not to share it.
Anyway, with $121 million in 17 days, the film is now positioned to soar past the $150 million mark in North America, which is a perfectly strong figure for a $90 million comic book flick. If Rampage was able to earn 30% of its domestic total ($30 million out of $101 million) after Avengers: Infinity War opened, then Shazam! should be able to survive the second "Avengers v. Thanos" smackdown. If anything, WB's own Detective Pikachu is probably a bigger threat to Shazam! than Avengers: Endgame. While a $400 million-plus finish will be a close call (mostly thanks to relative disinterest in China), it still crossed $300 million worldwide this weekend for a $322 million cume.
Barring flukes in either direction, it should end up with around $395 million global, about on par with (the far more expensive) Alita: Battle Angel ($405 million), Mad Max: Fury Road ($370 million), Edge of Tomorrow ($371 million). Is that a super-huge number? No, but it's about on par with Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse ($375 million on a $90 million budget) and The Nun ($366 million global on a $22 million budget). There's a reason WB and New Line didn't spend Aquaman money on a Shazam movie. When you spend less money, you can celebrate a smaller overall global gross. Maybe the sequel will breakout due to the quality/goodwill from this one. But as long as the budget is kept in check, it doesn't have to.
So, yeah, SHAZAM will have a nice profit, which bodes well for a sequel.
Apr 22nd, 2019 07:51 AM
Darth Thor
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: Asgard
It will have A profit. But nothing to justify a larger scale sequel. They may have to bring in The Rock earlier than planned.
Really hope this continues to have the legs to carry it to $400mill WW.
Apr 22nd, 2019 09:28 AM
Senor Cage
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location:
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Darth Thor
It will have A profit. But nothing to justify a larger scale sequel. They may have to bring in The Rock earlier than planned.
Really hope this continues to have the legs to carry it to $400mill WW.
Maybe, but you don't really know that. I'd guarantee that BA will have a higher budget. The Rock will justify that.
Apr 22nd, 2019 04:48 PM
Darth Thor
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: Asgard
^ I know that $300mill to break even would be an optimistic estimate.
It needs $400mill for them to consider risking a higher budget sequel. Either that, or just go straight in with Black Adam for the sequel. And screw his solo movie, which has been and continues to be in Development Hell.
Apr 22nd, 2019 07:39 PM
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
Text-only version