Rebels maul and Rebels Kenobi are both implied to have improved as duelists and both have shown signs of growth as force users. Arguing this isn't these two in their primes is just bs
edit:
if you really want to stretch crap you could argue that ben kenobi is a superior duelist from when he last fought maul(tcw) rather than rots, but thats a stretch
__________________ "Happiness is a lie. Life is horror. The light is always dying all across the universe. The last star will flicker out someday, when it does, all that remains is shadow. And I will be its king!"'-Amahl Farouk
So far, I'm surprised with how overwhelming the votes in favor of ANH Kenobi in his fights, but glad to see there's still a parity between RotS Kenobi and SoD Maul.
EDIT: Or maybe not...
__________________ "There is only Revan. Only he can shape this galaxy as it is meant to be shaped."
Last edited by Jaggarath on Mar 20th, 2017 at 01:18 AM
I did.
Maul is logically superior. The shortness of his fight vs a more skilled and powerful version of kenobi was clearly not due to a massive lack of skill. And given he was actively gaining knowledge, 15 years of power growth is more than suffecient for maul to be more powerful than kenobi.
Mar 20th, 2017 01:00 AM
