Jaggarath
DarthAnt66
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: USA
If DE was the only comic, sure (although the Chosen One prophecy is still destroyed). Then they made Dark Empire II and Empire's End, which ruined it.
__________________
"There is only Revan. Only he can shape this galaxy as it is meant to be shaped."
Apr 15th, 2017 10:12 PM
Azronger
Azronger Reborn
Registered: Jun 2016
Location: The Throne of the Sheevites
quote: (post ) Originally posted by DarthAnt66
If DE was the only comic, sure (although the Chosen One prophecy is still destroyed). Then they made Dark Empire II and Empire's End, which ruined it.
EE was crap, I admit, but I didn't mind DE II. Still better than the ST, though
__________________
Apr 15th, 2017 10:14 PM
Rockydonovang
freedom fighter
Registered: Dec 2016
Location:
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Azronger
Palpatine in DE redeemed his embarassing death in the OT. DE >>>>>>> ST
Because how cool sids looks dying should supersede the significance of anakin's redemption.
Not that its remotely the same as what the st did given that
a. DE was made before the prequel trilogy
b. De didn't destroy luke's order or the new republic
And anyway the eu leadership had changed from that era long before disney came into power.
So ant's just deflecting here
Apr 15th, 2017 10:15 PM
ares834
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: United States
Anakin's redemption was never about killing Sheev but rather saving Luke. And it predates the PT so one can't fault it for undermining the Chosen One prophecy. The bigger problem with DE is Luke turning to the dark side.
Apr 15th, 2017 10:20 PM
Jaggarath
DarthAnt66
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: USA
quote: (post ) Originally posted by ares834
Anakin's redemption was never about killing Sheev but rather saving Luke.
Interesting take.
__________________
"There is only Revan. Only he can shape this galaxy as it is meant to be shaped."
Apr 15th, 2017 10:23 PM
Rockydonovang
freedom fighter
Registered: Dec 2016
Location:
quote: (post ) Originally posted by ares834
Anakin's redemption was never about killing Sheev but rather saving Luke. And it predates the PT so one can't fault it for undermining the Chosen One prophecy. The bigger problem with DE is Luke turning to the dark side.
1. Thats's a pretty great interpretation actually
2. Yup
3. Well Luke does come back. And thats still not close to what tfa did(and tfa does not predate the ot, pt, or the saga)
Apr 15th, 2017 10:38 PM
Darth Thor
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Asgard
I'm with ares in that I'm Kinda afraid what they're going to do with Luke. Which I never thought would be an issue prior to this teaser.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Once again, I find it amusing the biggest critics of Star Wars films are Star Wars fans.
That actually makes sense. It's the same with comic book films.
Last edited by Darth Thor on Apr 15th, 2017 at 10:41 PM
Apr 15th, 2017 10:38 PM
Beniboybling
Worst Member
Registered: Jul 2014
Location: United Kingdom
quote: (post ) Originally posted by ares834
Uh, yeah I am. That's absolute shit and goes completely against what the character was in the OT. I'm hoping that he intends to create a better order of Jedi or something (and not this gray bullshit) but we'll see.
How? Luke tried to create a new Jedi Order and it failed, and this changed his perspective. It's not as if the character is not allowed to have growth.
__________________
Apr 15th, 2017 11:05 PM
UCanShootMyNova
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2016
Location:
Yeah this movie's going to be shit. I honestly don't give a shit about the ST anymore. Just hoping for some good spinoff movies in the Clone Wars and Empire era.
__________________
"I like big sweaty testicles." - DMB, Gchat, 2017.
"I worked Jack in" - DMB, Gchat, 2017.
Apr 15th, 2017 11:14 PM
Beniboybling
Worst Member
Registered: Jul 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Wow people are really triggered.
What's sad is that unlike TFA it's in a position to break the mold. Yet folks whine anyway.
__________________
Apr 15th, 2017 11:18 PM
UCanShootMyNova
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2016
Location:
Really not triggered. I was the first person to call TFA what it was "garbage." This movie seems like it'll be garbage to.
I'll be very happy if it's NOT garbage. But why hold expectations that will probably disappoint you?
Nah. As long as they make a few books with Thrawn level quality I'm happy.
__________________
"I like big sweaty testicles." - DMB, Gchat, 2017.
"I worked Jack in" - DMB, Gchat, 2017.
Apr 15th, 2017 11:28 PM
Beniboybling
Worst Member
Registered: Jul 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Uhuh, only a mad bro would decide the movie is shit having only seen a teaser.
The butthurt flowing through you being guaranteed to ruin your viewing experience and you nitpick for flaws to justify your anger. Pitiable.
__________________
Apr 15th, 2017 11:34 PM
UCanShootMyNova
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2016
Location:
*Shrug* Can't help how I feel.
And I feel this movie will be more garbage PC/OT fanboy pandering.
__________________
"I like big sweaty testicles." - DMB, Gchat, 2017.
"I worked Jack in" - DMB, Gchat, 2017.
Apr 15th, 2017 11:39 PM
ares834
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Beniboybling
How? Luke tried to create a new Jedi Order and it failed, and this changed his perspective. It's not as if the character is not allowed to have growth.
Characters can certainly grow. The problem is when it's all off screen and you turn the hero into a mopey depressive failure.
Apr 15th, 2017 11:42 PM
Beniboybling
Worst Member
Registered: Jul 2014
Location: United Kingdom
The directors aren't in a position to cover 30 years of Luke's growth, as they weren't for Han & Leia. Nor is it necessary to understand the character's motivations. But it would fundamentally make no sense for them to be in the same place now as they where three decades ago.
And the hero as it turns out, doesn't always win, and can indeed experience a crisis of faith. That's called realism.
__________________
Last edited by Beniboybling on Apr 15th, 2017 at 11:47 PM
Apr 15th, 2017 11:45 PM
Rockydonovang
freedom fighter
Registered: Dec 2016
Location:
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Beniboybling
The directors aren't in a position to cover 30 years of Luke's growth, as they weren't for Han & Leia. Nor is it necessary to understand the character's motivations. But it would fundamentally make no sense for them to be in the same place now as they where three decades ago.
And yet the premise of tfa makes it so that the characters were in the exact same place they were 30 years ago
Apr 15th, 2017 11:47 PM
ares834
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: United States
That's fine. But then they shouldn't undermine the characters like they seem to be doing with Luke or completely undo all character growth as they did with Han.
Also these are movies not the real world. Having the hero utterly fail is completely unfulfilling and it hurts the previous films.
Last edited by ares834 on Apr 15th, 2017 at 11:51 PM
Apr 15th, 2017 11:49 PM
ares834
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Rockydonovang
And yet the premise of tfa makes it so that the characters were in the exact same place they were 30 years ago
Nailed it.
Apr 15th, 2017 11:51 PM
Beniboybling
Worst Member
Registered: Jul 2014
Location: United Kingdom
In what respect.
If your referring to OT style setting that's just changing the goal posts kek.
__________________
Apr 16th, 2017 12:02 AM
ares834
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: United States
Agreeing with someone is changing the goal posts now.
Apr 16th, 2017 12:04 AM
All times are UTC. The time now is 03:41 AM.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
Text-only version