Antifa ISN'T always the violent attackers. But in recent times they are the ones showing up at major concervitive events with the intent to get the event shut down. Nazis don't actually assemble en masse all that often. The left seems to have protested events of the right far more often than vice versa in recent times and Antifa always seems to show up at a large portion of these protest with the express intent of using far more than words to support their cause. As far as I know the Nazis haven't showed up at a left wing event and picked fights/started riots just to get the event shut down so far this year.
__________________
Last edited by darthgoober on Aug 21st, 2017 at 08:54 PM
It makes sense that the largest racial demographic would also have the most poor people, but what study shows that conservatives receive more social benefits than liberals?
No, correct on the Nazis/KKK/Alt-Right assembling, not until recently a least. Wonder what happened.
That doesn't do away with the historic violent nature of White Supremacist though. You don't get to spread an imagine of hatred and violence and then go "just look the other way, okay." Don't care how you try rebranding yourselves with a "White Nationalism" moniker.
Both sides were responsible for the violence. The violence.
There were violent clashes on both sides. It is not wrong to say both sides are culpable in the violence.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
and one side was responsible for the terrorism and murder. so you and your bros just keep trying to wave your hand and causally dismiss that. try very very hard.
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
What is your definition of terrorism? Since it doesn't just involve murder. I'd argue both sides did shit that could be defined as that. One side committed murder.
This does not magically erase the violence and destruction.
New Jersey has labeled them terrorists, but you just shrug it off and say it's to appease the alt right.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
One side was responsible for a murder this is true.
Both were responsible for violence and terrorism
Terrorism: the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims. This sounds like both groups yes?
Well eventually they ARE going to assemble from time to time... especially to defend monuments that they're in favor of. If no one had been trying to tear the monuments down, I seriously doubt they would have assembled to protest the monuments being taken down.
Very true but people have been wary of white supremacists for a long time, most of the country already rightly hates them and tries to keep a close eye on their actions. Antifa is something fairly new and currently more active than white supremacists which is why people are so quick to bring them up and point them out. White supremacist are already under intense scrutiny by pretty much the whole country. What people are actually wanting in regards to Antifa is more scrutiny because nowadays they the bigger problem in regards to frequency of violent occurrence even though they haven't yet matched the white supremacist in regards to the magnitude of individual violence. People who are concerned with Antifa don't want to wait for them to show willingness to kill in the streets because they assemble more often in greater numbers, work hard to conceal their identities(which means they'll be harder to bring to justice), and their professed cause is popular even though their words and actions fail to match up.
__________________
Last edited by darthgoober on Aug 21st, 2017 at 09:17 PM
I said both sides were culpable for the violence. The car thing was not the only violence.
Again: these people, in Boston, admitted they were communists and not patriots. They are so anti nazi they burn the flag of the country that helped beat the nazis.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Query: who erected most of these statues people are so upset over?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Nope, blaze hasn't told me anything. Just wondering which party, overall, pushed for these kind of statues.
Like the Jefferson Memorial, who wanted it?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Unless that guy is just a another "lying liberal cuck", seems these statues mainly went up duing two periods of American history. Jim Crow and the Civil Rights movement. Clearly it was Liberals.
Here's a handy screen-cap for you, my Liberal Derangement Syndrome suffering friend: https://ibb.co/hfe5U5
I watched the video, they went up during certain periods of history. Yes, the point?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.