Meh. Making Climate Change a Left Vs Right thing does no good. We all live on Earth regardless of our politics, so it shouldn't be a Us Vs Them mindset, ideally.
IMO, focus squarely on the those in current power and who are scared of using the words "climate change", trying to relabeled it with something that sounds more benign. Trump and his followers.
Keep in mind this is 100% not debatable by Rob standards lol. He has labeled me as whining for saying "this is legit funny" and posting a link(literally nothing else).
I feel it stands, given his history. But for him it won't, just watch lol. There will be a spectacular reason given.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Lol, so is this the new strategy? You pretend like you don't remember your past behavior and you toss out a "wow" ?
Feels like it'd only work on the gullible, to be honest. Good luck with it though.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
As noted in the previous page, I did not attack you in here, but you seem hell bent on picking a fight as a means to derail away from the topic of Climate Change/America. Weird.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
I generally speak out against a lot of the left-wing people here, because I think intersectional social justice is cancer.
But just to provide my two cents here, I don't agree with the right wing position on climate change, and while I agree with Trump America wasn't exactly getting the good deal on the Paris climate accord, I could see myself being more in agreement with Trump if he actually displayed any modicum of concern for the issue.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
No one [sensible] is saying we need to stop driving internal combustion cars tomorrow and that factories need to switch over to being powered on farts. But the "it's not happening, it's all a complete hoax" narrative is impossibly idiotic and crazy dangerous. Cos what if the models are wrong, but it's actually worse? We take preemptive action on "even if there's a 1% chance" in regards to massive possible threats, why not climate change?
It's like you create these weird fantasies in your head. I never said you attacked me. I said you were not interested in legitimate discussion.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Um, I'm having "legitimate" and non-confrontational discussions on the topic with others in here. See above, guy. So do you have anything else, besides attacking and derailing?
Lol we both know this was based off your original posts, not what you're saying now.
But you go on and pretend otherwise, what else is new?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
I'm actually skeptical about the implications and severity of the threat because the hard core pushers of the idea keep getting the effects wrong. The world didn't start towards an ice age in the late 80s like they suggested in the 70s. The world didn't become unbearably hotter with new deserts forming by 2000 like they suggested in the late 80s once they realized they were wrong about global cooling. Despite all the talk about the ice caps disappearing for decades, in 2013 the southern ice cap was bigger than had ever been recorded according to NASA satellite reports. In 2009 Al Gore that the north ice cap would be completely melted within 7 years... and it's not.
I'm not saying that there's nothing happening, but the fact of the matter is that people obviously don't know enough about how the whole system works together to scare me in regards to their predicted consequences. At this point they seem a lot like those preachers who keep predicting the rapture on a specific day so everyone in his churge gears up and waits for it... and then when it doesn't happen the preacher makes another prediction and everyone does it again and the cycle just goes on and on. I believe in God but there's no way I'm going to sell all my stuff and go out in field and wait for him.
__________________
Last edited by darthgoober on Aug 15th, 2017 at 09:25 PM
Except of course we can see affects of mass pollution for one, in our poisoned food/water and deaths of animal species directly connected with pollution, while absolutely nothing has happened to suggest a rapture is near. So that's a pretty faulty comparison and a potentially dangerous one.
Yes we see SOME effects, but the scientist keep getting the outcome and timeframe wrong. If they can't get that right, then something within the science they're using is off and I'm not going to panic until there's some evidence that they've figured out what it is/was and accounted for it. I mean Hell, the preachers were probably right at least once or twice about one of the church members getting over cancer or something like that...
Once your prediction about the outcome of something has been PROVEN wrong, you've got to start over from square one and reevaluate the subject not just push back the deadline. And if you've been proven wrong multiple times, you need to start your evaluation from a slightly different direction rather than beginning with the exact same mindset and opening steps.
__________________
Last edited by darthgoober on Aug 15th, 2017 at 09:41 PM
KMC Community Forums
Aug 15th, 2017 07:56 PM
